Physical Palingenesis. Movement and wave-particle fluctuations: Reproduction in space.
In the graph, a particle moves, reproducing a quantic wave or ‘field of matter’, since in fact all physical movements reproduce a form in a field of energy . Thus the reproductive speed of a wave that imprints a surface of spatial energy is also a quantic jump in space-time. The spatial energy will vary but the process is always the same.
For example, a wave of light reproduces a photon one wave after another over the gravitational energy of vacuum . In that sense the particle-wave duality implies that each wave of light ‘dies’ and it is reborn in the discontinuous, next region of space-time as a palingenetic, new wave. And indeed, the waveform of an electromagnetic disturbance is exactly the same wave form that the standard waveform of the 3 ages of space-time . Thus, though a spatial wave is mainly a quantic jump of spatial energy, it also requires a degree of informative transference and so it can also be considered a palingenetic dual process of reproduction, defined in illogic symbols as a wave-particle fluctuations: E>T<E>T. Those particle-wave fluctuations are a common phenomenon in the physical Universe: electronic orbitals fluctuate between its particle and wave state; particles die and explode into the past reproducing spatial fields, while spatial fields implode into particles as they evolve into the future; singularities explode into big-bangs that latter evolve towards the future in big-banging, reproductive processes . However, when a wave-particle fluctuation ends in the travel towards the past and doesn’t evolve further it becomes a death phenomenon if the spatial wave does not evolve back into a particle or a palingenetic reproduction.
The linguistic method and the constants of light.
The linguistic method is a fundamental principle of ‘Non-AE epistemology’ that deals with the verification of truths at theoretical level, which requires the existence of 3 homologous truths: the spatial, external truth; the temporal, internal truth and the combined organic perspective. Thus a truth is verifiable theoretically when the 3 descriptions of an event in the 3 main languages of man, the temporal, verbal language, the mathematical, spatial language and the visual, organic, ET-perspective coincide. For example, in quantic theory the spatial perspective is given by Heisenberg’s Matrix, the temporal perspective by Schrödinger’s equation and the organic one by Dirac’s equations and the 3 are equivalent. So quantic Theory is right.
If we apply the same principle to C, the reproductive constant of light-speed, the fundamental cycle of any existential being, that combines its energy and information cycles, Re=TxE, we can also obtain the equation of reproductive speed from 3 different perspectives:
- i-1: We can calculate C from the i-1 perspective of the ‘energy and information quanta’ on which light feeds through Maxwell’s equation that relates the 3 inner dimensions of light existence:
c (Reproduction, f(ext)) = (µo x eo)-1/2 =(e x t)i-1
Where the min. cellular unit of light energy is the magnetic constant, called permeability of free space, µo. And its min. cellular, informative unit is the electric constant, called permittivity of free space, eo. Which proves that light speed is really the function of reproduction of a light wave that feeds on the S and T quanta of the lower gravitational/magnetic world: µo x eo.
i: We can measure light speed in our ‘light world’ through empirical observations and the complex wave equations of quantum theory, as it will remain constant between its ‘death and birth limits’, given by the Lorentz transformations.
i+1: Einstein’s mass equation, E=Mc2, explains how a mass dies or inversely transforms bidimensional photons into quanta of a bigger i-organic, atomic particle, giving us the i+1 perspective of a charge or mass made of light quanta.
The 3 perspectives together describe the TxE function of existence of light and its organic dimensions of energy, information and reproduction. While Plank’s constant, h=ExT, defines the social cycles of light evolution. Hence it is also the fundamental constant that defines the social and communicative cycles of light as a quanta of more complex organic particles.
The postulate of light speed: Special Relativity.
Since we have studied the death of light in depth , we can consider of the multiple events that relate light and its i-1 gravitational plane the phenomenon of synchronicity, which happens between particles and photons that communicate through gravitation. According to Quantic Spaces-Times theory light devolves into gravitational space or emits a ‘cellular quantun’ of its inner form, a gravitational wave to communicate with other photon. Since any entity communicates, emitting quantic actions of its inner form. So a photon makes a jump into the past, which creates a spatial quantum of gravitation, ruled by the space-time inversion, max.E=min.T. Since a gravitational wave can have a spatial size of 1011 years light, the approximate radius of the Universe, the spatial simultaneity created between 2 particles communicated by a quantic emission of a gravitational wave can reach the entire Universe, creating what physicists call an interlaced, synchronic couple. Einstein called the phenomenon of ‘synchronicity’, which proves the instantaneous speed of gravitation ‘spooky’:
Scientists found that 2 particles communicated by gravitational forces, which had contact in the past, act in synchronicity regardless of the distance between them that can be as big as the Universe . Yet, their distance is only a minimal quantic jump in time to their lower level of gravitational non-local forces. Which proves illogically that the Universe is an interconnected, relative present organism .
Synchronicity will help us to explain Special Relativity from the perspective of Quantic Spaces-Times Theory. Since Relativity is the previous paradigm of Space-time we have also to explain in Quantic Spaces-Times terms its postulates about light. Those postulates affirm that the speed of light is constant, that space is homogenous and isotropic, continuous and without direction, in others words that space doesn’t move and fluctuates but it is fixed. Yet empirical proves accumulate against those postulates, which were never proved. The background radiation in fact is an absolute frame of reference; galaxies show that the space is discontinuous and it is not homogenous. And finally light speed is independent of the speed of the macroscopic observer because when an instrument observes light it does it with electrons that previously got connected in gravitational space, the i-1 lower plane of ET in which light will latter feed and reproduce as a wave that communicates those electrons. Let us see that effect in detail.
The communication of electronic and mass particles through light causes a paradox, which Einstein explained mathematically with its Special Relativity but whose ‘why’ requires Non AE logic: light speed is constant regardless of the speed of the observer. Why that speed of light is independent of the movement of the observer? The answer is that the particles that emit light, the electrons of the observer, are not really moving when they communicate a light ray…
Time-space moves jumping discontinuously like a film does in a camera. Since all informative processes require according to the Vortex Paradox a still position. You see a moving continuity between frames but actually the image locks for a second in stillness; next light comes across the negative, and an image is shown in the screen; then the camera moves very fast to the next frame; it stops and locks the film again and you see again an image on the screen. While you think the entire movie moves continuously, actually it is jumping, locking, forming the image, becoming still, moving again, locking, becoming still...
So happens between 2 particles that communicate light: Since light needs gravitational, temporal energy to draw its form, particles first communicate a flow of gravitational space-time that ties them up into a quantic, fixed S-T present, through which ‘light’ will feed with reproductive speed, c, as it is transferred between both still atoms. Thus, because both atoms are still, there is no movement between both in the quantic fraction of time in which they emit light, and therefore the light we measure always moves at a constant speed between both atoms. Yet, before light communicated both electronic particles, instantaneous gravitation has created an ‘interlaced’ couple, locking the space/time between them into a relative present. And so regardless of the speed and distance between those 2 particles, light communicates them as if they were ‘fixed’ in static gravitational space. That is why your electronic mind also sees the gravitational, moving field of the Earth as a mental, fixed light-space. Thus the Einsteinian postulate of a maximal c-speed only applies within the limits of our EA light-space. While his Special Relativity is a useful tool of measure of relative speeds and distances, which misses however the deeper quantic reason of a constant light speed.
The upper informative species contract and expand their relative energies.
But perception is relative to the scale in which we perceive. At our scale bodies are fixed, at cellular scale they move. So the electronic fixed world of human measures is not the real light and gravitational space. Since light is a wave of energy that constantly interacts with gravitational space, modifying its parameters and densities as it feeds on energy. While the mind or the electronic instrument, which do not see how gravitational space is expanded and contracted by light only perceive a fixed wave of light, transforming the energy fluctuations of gravitational space caused by light into colors, which reflect the changes in the frequency and length of light-waves. Hence the cosmological Doppler effect that expands and contracts gravitational space doesn’t seem to occur around us because our mind only sees the light space formed over it. Yet the magnetic fields that appear constantly when a charge moves, forming a vortex similar to the one that appears in a river when a fish moves, show clearly that ‘under the fixed world of electrons’ and ‘light colors’, there is a ‘gravitational and magnetic world’ in perpetual movement, which provides spatial energy to the light and seems lineal to us, (hence there are not magnetic monopoles): The flat, magnetic field of an electromagnetic wave is energy transferred from that gravitational world over which light creates its informative, electric height. In that regard, the transfer of energy between both scales, the gravitational world and the electric world is possible through the intermediate magnetic field, the ‘energetic body’ of a wave of light. Of course, because movement is relative and we do not see the fluctuations of gravitational space that light bends and expands, but how electrons interpret it, Relativity works perfectly as a tool of measure of the upper ‘electronic world’, its distances and relationships. But if we were gravitational beings we would see a fluctuating river of space/time. What vision is certain? Both are. It depends on the perspective. Yet since the product of space and time in any relative world is an organic constant, (Lorentz Invariance in the light world), and electronic humans do not account for that movement of gravitational space, Einstein had to make time fluctuate to make correct his equations. The result are the famous Lorentz and Einstein’s transformations that, by accepting the illusion of a fixed space, made variable time, the other ‘speed factor’, Vc=E/T, so the product of both parameters, according to the space/time inversion that defines a quantic action -reaction cycle, TxE=K, remains constant, invariant. Thus, although Einstein’s Relativity facilitates correct calculations of distances in the light world, it doesn’t explain objectively reality, where time dominates energetic space. So it is better to accept the temporal perspective from a conceptual point of view to understand the moving, gravitational world.