THE BIG-BANG AND THE BIG-BANGING: ALL ORGANIC SYSTEMS FEED IN ENERGY AND REPRODUCE.
We consider that the birth of a galaxy and probably a Universe is fruit of the explosion into energy of a black hole, a dense package of gravitational information. And we distinguish 2 phases, the big-bang or death into energy of the form of the Black hole Universe. And the big-banging or reproductive radiation of new particle forms that fed in the energy of the big bang.
The Big-banging reproduced and evolved a nucleon at the same time the Big-bang killed it, in a ‘cycle of time-space’ called the Universe that can be seen as a positive-negative flow that virtually disappears into itself (metaphysical point of view), or in one of both arrows separated, as an arrow of entropy (AE-Universe) that disorder a mass, and the positive arrow of creation from the nothingness of space-time strings of energy and spins of information a new scale of atomic particles fed on the gravitational energy of the Big-bang, that went on, evolving and differentiating their constant proportions of energy and time through E<=>T inversions, dimensional growth and social evolution, giving birth to the forces, particles and social structures of the Universe in 3 Horizons of growing complexity: the age of particles, atoms and celestial bodies. Whatever of the 3 perspectives, the dual, metaphysical, organic one that ads up the big-banging and the big-bang to create the immortal virtual, non-existent and existent death and life of the Universe; or the spatial, energetic one chosen by AE-science or even the informative, entropic, teleological one, chosen by religions and those ascribed to the Intelligent Design, we are describing the same event with different detail.
After the Gravitational big-bang expanded space-time at super-luminal speeds, it followed a series of reproductive radiations or ‘big-bangings’ (slang for copula) of quantic particles recreated over that energy of that big-bang. That big-banging created the fundamental particles of the Universe its nucleons, photons and electrons:
The Universe, just after the big-bang, was a hot, dense superfluid soup of quarks and gluons, of ‘nucleons’ in a distended state. So if the central singularity was a hyper-black hole made of superfluid ‘bosonic’ nucleons (quark-boson organisms) the big-bang and big-banging were almost simultaneous: as bidimensional nucleons absorbed and transformed the energy of the big-bang, into a reproductive wave , that expanded till saturating the initial vacuum-energy left by the explosion. The reproductive, quantic wave of nucleons, which are dynamic, bidimensional vortices, explain why the singularity had such a small volume and yet could give birth to a huge Universe. The alternative creation of the Universe, out of a ‘solid’ hyper mass of the size of an atom that weighted as much as the present Universe, is just an absurd theory that shows the limits of AE-science and its epistemological errors . It is like thinking that the first cell of your body had all the cells within it, instead of reproducing, as it absorbs energy from the placenta, in the case of the big-banging, from the expanding Non-AE membrane or even an outer hyper-Universe. In the abstract vision, nevertheless, all the mass was already in the first singularity. Let’s play with the numbers:
- Astronomers can't fit the mass of the Universe in that singularity which had a volume similar to a Planck area (10-65cm2). Even it that "singularity" had the max. theoretical density of the Universe, the Planck density and we move back to the hyper-Universe and its ultra-small hyper-black hole, it only could produce from 1 to 10 nucleons. Further on, the singularity could not have the huge temperature AE-science considered it had, because temperature is a measure of spatial vibration, so it occupies space, and the singularity occupied no space. Thus the initial black hole made of bosonic nucleons that started the big-bang was a cyclical mass vortex that merely switched from cyclical to lineal movement in a quantum of time, (10-35) expanding in at super luminal speeds (according to the space-time inversion: Max S =Min T) and reproducing billions of those nucleons.
To understand that process, we redefine temperature in terms of cyclical speed. Temperature is an action -reaction , vibration process, which according to space-time duality has 2 readings: as energy it means the speed of that vibration. Yet in cyclical terms it means the speed of a cyclical vortex of information which increases as the radius diminishes according to the vortex paradox: VoxRo=K. Hence it is in cyclical terms a parameter of the ‘informative speed’, or ‘intelligence’ of that hyper-black hole. In the big-bang that cyclical temperature became lineal movement, as time became space and cyclical speed lineal energy, in a process that happened in a 10-35 s. almost simultaneous, present time. Then, as a lineal, reproductive wave the black hole vortex of bosonic nucleons uncoiled, creating according to the duality of temporal energy both, a spatial distance and the informative blue print of particles that filled potentially the Universe:
Max.Temperature(cyclical movement)=>Max.E(Lineal Movement)=>Max.Space=>Nucleon wave
Since in a quantic universe a wave that speeds up is a reproductive wave , in the same way a wave of light imprints an electromagnetic wave, the wave of ultra-dense energy coming out of the singularity, imprinted an ultra wave of nucleon quanta. A Big-bang based only in lineal temperature is absurd, since it says that the singularity was very hot but very small. Yet, hot lineal temperature expands space is space, so it can’t be a singularity. For example, a hot gas occupies a lot of space. Thus in the nanoseconds calculated for the initial explosion of the big bang, the amazing temporal speed of cyclical vibration of the singularity, became a lineal wave that imprinted, reproduced ±1043 nucleon’s wave-lengths of potential seminal nucleon particles, till the limits of the Universal diameter. Which is also the diameter obtained by Dirac in his Theory of Great Numbers .
In that sense, the big bang is another prove of the cyclical, moving nature of masses, which are vortices ruled by its Space-time inverse equation: max. Vo x min. Ro=K.
Quantic Spaces-Times theory unlike AE science that gives excellent explanations of ‘how things occurred’ provides the ‘whys’. And the big-bang ‘why’ is reproduction. Since the speed of reproduction of a nucleon wave could fill the Universe with nucleons, as fast as an abstract explosion. In Biology we talk of an 'organic radiation' when a reproductive wave of particles saturates an ecosystem of relative energy, since it ‘expands so fast as an atomic bomb. A bacterium reproduces on agar into millions a day. Only when agar is filled with bacteria and there is no more energy, reproduction slows down.
17. The unpacking of the singularity.
According to the linguistic method we can apply multiple perspectives to the study of a black hole brain that range from a geometrical, abstract analysis to a biophysical study of its force, to metaphysical arguments over how its informative mind is constructed:
- In temporal, biological terms, the geometric, spatial big-bang has an homologous reading: The hyper-black hole singularity feeds on matter till it exhausts it and then it dies in a generational cycle that reverses the arrows of life and death of the Universe as in all organisms. Since times have 2 directions or in abstract terms, ‘the physical world is invariant respect to its time coordinates’, we might in a deeper analysis consider 2 possible big-bangs according to those directions: one coming from past, simple energy particles and the other coming from future evolved Hyper-black holes. So we might wonder which was first the ‘egg=singularity’ or the ‘chicken=Universe’. In Non-AE logic there is no an answer as it depends on which temporal orientation we consider. The E>T arrow of ‘life’ means that the Universe was created by the evolution of quantic gravitational, spatial energy, below the size of light forms. Pure vacuum space should have created first photons that absorbed gravitational energy, then electrons with a balanced space-time form and finally nucleons, in an evolutionary, informative ternary ladder of sub-particles. But if we consider the inverse arrow, a ‘palingenetic’ cyclical Universe is also possible, as the one cosmologists contemplate: it is the inverse process of death and renewal departing from a black hole of super-fluid, bosonic nucleons that devolved its form into space and reproduced those nucleons till filling the entire Universe.
There is an old legend about the speed of reproduction. The king of Leon wanted a falcon from a noble, the Count of Castile. The Count of Castile who loved his falcon asked him to put a seed of wheat in a chessboard square, then 'reproduce' that seed and put 2 in the 2nd square. And so on. That was the price. The king agreed, but could not fill the chessboard even with the wheat production of the entire kingdom. So he had to pay the Count with the legal title of King of Castile, which latter became King of Spain. 64 squares are 64 quanta of minimal time that created an infinite number of nucleon reproductions: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024. Every '10' quantic times, there are 1000 times more particles. So if nucleons reproduced as fast as they do in a high-energy accelerator, due to the enormous relative ‘speed of times’ of its minimal vortex, its organic radiation could saturate the gravitational Universe as fast as an abstract big-bang. But perhaps the most revealing prove of the reproductive nature of the big-bang are its magic numbers:
Cosmologists said that the Universe tripled 60 times during the inflationary age and use a factor, e60 to express that growth, where e is the ‘generational number’ that in most biological curves of population show the growth of a species through one generation. In other words, the original nucleon and its 3 quarks, reproduced 60 generations to create the Universal kingdom; like the king of Leon, the Universal reproduction didn’t even arrive to the 64th squares; it only lasted a relative minute of time, 60 reproductions. Similarly, if bacteria in a solution multiply at a rate proportional to the number present, a number N at time zero becomes a number Nekt at time t. Yet since reproduction in space is the inverse function of d=evolution in time, the same inverse number, Ne-kt, shows the quantity of radioactive atoms that have not died after a t time of an atomic ‘big-bang. So if we multiply both functions, E>T(reproductive big-banging: ekt) x T<E (dying process:e-kt)=1, reality remains the same. From where we deduce that the big-bang and big-banging process balance each other and at the end of its total generational cycle the Universe will return to its unity, in an immortal, eternal cycle as any other life-death, big-bang, big-crunch cycle of reality.
Why 60 times? Again the probable reason is a complex space-time symmetry of Non-AE Algebra that we will only enunciate: E=60 elements creates the most perfect spatial form in most systems. For example, 60 atoms form the smallest ‘top predator’ super fluid Helium nanoball, which is made with 240 nucleons, a magic number also present in the top predator species of the 2 next scales: the biggest atom, Uranium-238, which emits 4-helium particles in its radioactive processes is probably an incomplete 60x4 structure; while the malleable, most perfect fuller ball top predator molecules have 60 atoms. Thus in the same manner, since Et is the ‘transcendental number’ of hierarchical structures (for example, 32 (+1) creates a perfect bidimensional tetrarkys), we deduce that 360 creates a perfect hierarchical organism, based in quark triads (nucleons): the Universe.
Then, those nucleons evolved and differentiated through ‘quantic mini-big bangs’ into up quarks and electrons . In that regard we have to talk of at least 2 ‘different big-bangs’, the black hole/nucleon gravitational big-bang, the so called inflationary age and the Beta decay/electronic big-bang, which further increased the size of the Universe. Finally the 4 fundamental elements of those big-bangings, gravitation and nucleons, electromagnetism and electrons, started together its social evolution into complex atomic forms. And finally reorganized its quantic parts in space, creating a Fractal Organism with the 3 zones of all space-time fields.
1. The horizons of the big-banging: the evolution of the ecosystem defines its species.
The relative proportions of energy and information of any given ecosystem, the Earth or the Non-AE Universe, define the type of species that might live on it. For example, when the water of the oceans froze, only organisms that gathered in hot, under water volcanoes survived . In the big-bang Universe, there was also a selection of species, as the cyclical singularity with its fast temporal rhythms and informative density was transformed according to the Space-Time Inversion, (Max.E= Min.T), into an ecosystem with a wider range of energetic spaces at colder temperatures and slower time rhythms. Cosmologists establish an equation to explain that transformation which is the equivalent at cosmological scale of ‘h’, the constant of action at quantic scale:
Spatial size of the Universe x Temporal Vibrational Temperature =K
Thus, though K, the constant of action of the Universe, remained the same, the whole Universe became bigger and slower at time passed by, allowing the creation of bigger and slower particles.
The previous equation shows the general S-T inversion of any big-bang: as an informative seed translates its dimensions of temporal information into spatial energy it ‘slows down’ its time rhythms and increases its spatial surface. So a series of forms of decreasing information and increasing energy become created and reproduced in that changing environment. Since the change of the Universe’s E-T parameters affects its quantic parts, which are born and evolve only when those parameters ‘permit their existence’. The same principle applied to the existence of humans is called in AE-science the anthropic principle: the Universe has today the parameters it requires to sustain life not because God has created the Universe with those parameters to fit humanity but because it just happens to be ‘passing’ through those parameters and so humanity can be here observing it. But in the future the Universe won’t be fit to sustain human life. Thus, the fundamental particles of the Universe are ‘stable proportions of spatial energy and temporal information’ that ‘freeze’ during the different states of the big-banging, when the cooling down of the energy and information of the Universe ‘passes through their S-T proportions’, according to the space-time inversion (min.E x max.T=K). Or in other words, since the Universe is both a quantic and continuous form, we could consider that in its continuous form those parameters represent the ‘total Universe’ and in its discontinuous form the quantic sum of particles that had those proportions and have flourish in each age of the Universe. So as the energy of the Universe diminished, new informative structures were created in 3 Horizons of ‘reproductive radiations’ or ‘big-bangings’: The age of particles and forces (I horizon); the age of atoms (II Horizon) and the age of cosmological bodies (III Horizon).
Each age created species with more mass, less ‘temporal speed’ and wider size. Cosmology studies the creation of those horizons of matter at global scale. While Physics makes it at quantic scale.
2. The 2 arrows of the Universe: the simultaneous big-bang, big-banging process.
In AE-Cosmology we would merely develop the previous 3 ages as a single arrow of Universal evolution; however the Non-AE logic of the Universe implies to understand the Universe as the sum of 3 cyclical arrows that complete a cycle and in a way cancel each other making reality virtual:
- Max. E: The entropic arrow or big-bang arrow, which is studied by AE-science and defines the Universe as the ‘destruction of an informative black hole’ into a surface of energy.
- E=T: The simultaneous big-banging arrow or reproductive arrow that creates the particles and structures of the Universe in reproductive, quantic waves that expand the ‘relative present’ of those forms (creating multiple nucleons, multiple atoms, multiple Universes, etc.)
- Max. T: The arrow of order, social evolution and information, the intelligent but impersonal arrow that designs reality, aggregating into ‘bosonic points’ and complex organisms that curve energy into information, or creating with those waves of parallel particles, fractal images and minds.
Though AE-science only feels at ease with the big-bang arrow, the big-banging arrow and the arrow of social evolution are quite obvious and needed to complete the description of the Universe. Further on, the arrow of future order and past disorder ad up to create a virtual, immortal Universe, in which nothing happens as the fluctuation of Universes of life and order and perception is balanced by antiuniverses of disorder and death and destruction. A quantic example can explain those choices: we see particles and antiparticles with the 2 inverse arrows of form being formed from the present vacuum. We can order them as ‘particles’ that are born from the present (in an evolutionary E>T process) and then die as antiparticles (in a big-bang, T>E process) and then we will have order them as humans order their life; or we can consider they are born simultaneously as particles and antiparticles that die latter together creating a virtual ‘Universe’. Or we can even consider that the antiparticle is ‘imaginary’ and so there is only an arrow of future, the particle. Again we can consider the 3 perspectives for the Universe.
We, human beings, exist as organisms through the arrow of order that we call life and so we see the future as information. While we see the Universe through the arrow of disorder and entropy. Yet those are partial perceptions, caused by the human peculiar ‘arrow of time’. In the total Universe, the logic of simultaneity doesn’t differentiate those 3 arrows sequentially. So the Universe could be born out of a big-bang explosion that degenerated a black hole into space and then evolved it back through different reproductive radiations of particles: T<E=R>T; or inversely, the real arrow of time could be the big-banging evolution of energy into radiations of forms and then the explosion of the big-bang, E>T=R<E…Thus Non-AE logic fusions the 3 arrows both for the Universe as a whole and for the different species of each science. In that sense AE-Biology tends to use the informative arrow as the single arrow that creates life, hardly understanding the inverse arrow of death that completes the cycle of a biological quantum. Quantic Physics accepts both arrows as equal. While astrophysics prefers to study only the entropy, energy arrow with its big-bang models.
3. The I Horizon of the big-banging: particles and its 3 sub-particles ages.
The particles of the Universe can be explained as trophic pyramids in biological terms, from the perspective of the Darwinian relationships they establish between the different i±1 scales of matter, or they can be considered in a communicative, present perspective as exchanges of temporal energy between similar particles or they can be observed in abstract as AE-science through mathematical equations, which explain those biological and geometrical relations. Since all physicists know the mathematical description we will stress the other 2 ways of perceiving the physical world. In geometrical terms, light contracts and expands gravitational space; and inversely electrons contract and expand light; and finally nucleons contract and expand electrons into pions and muons.
Those 3 events that define the relationships of the 3 ‘scales’ of matter can be seen in biological terms as light feeding on gravitational points, as electrons absorbing photons and as nucleons feeding on electrons. Those biological ‘whys’ define then the ‘expanding and imploding geometry’ of photons, electrons and nucleons that gather together or explode as they live and die, feed the superior level of existence or destroy it.
We thus can see each previous particle as ‘the feeding energy’ of the next particle, from the Darwinian perspective, or alternatively as the ‘evolving micro-quanta’ that ‘transcends’ to the next level, or combine both and see each transformation of energy into form and vice versa (each boson that becomes a fermion), as an organic dual, big-bang, big-banging process of a form that dies and a form that feeds on the temporal energy, exploded. Scientists should learn to change their logic, temporal perspective as they change their spatial angle when they photograph particles and forces.
The trophic pyramids among particles.
According to that logic duality, in a Universe with a positive arrow of order, we can trace 3 horizons of evolution of those particles that created from gravitational energy light, from high energy photons, electrons and from massive Tau electrons, quarks, which evolve socially in a triad to form nucleons. Those 3 horizons of particles’ evolution form a growing stair of folded dimensions that finally started the social evolution of all those particles into a more complex form, the atom, (+1), concluding according to the law of 3 d=evolutions, the I Horizon of matter creation. And inversely, in a Universe dominated by the arrow of devolution and entropy, the big-bang of bosonic nucleons creates electrons and pions (electrons of great mass, with a shorter vortex radius that live within the nucleus) that ‘degenerate’ into spatial photons, giving birth to an energetic Universe. In both cases the different particles are related organically as complex particles feed (energetic p.o.v.) or evolve (informative p.o.v.) from simple ones. Hence in biological terms all those possible ‘big-bangs’, ‘big bangings’ and ‘big-crunches’ of particles fit within the trophic proportions between a population of top predator forms, which represent between 10 and a 25% of their energetic victims on any ecosystem that has reached a balance or “steady state”, similar to the one of the present Universe, where new masses are only created in “stellar and black hole placentas”. So there is a balance between the density of matter (24%) that feeds on dark Energy (76%). And there is a balance between photons and charges (1 to 10), and between the primary atom, Hydrogen (76%) and Helium (24%), which ‘feeds’ on Hydrogen through atomic fusion processes; as it happens in the trophic pyramids of Earth’s ecosystems. Thus we consider a trophic, evolutionary chain, which in the big-bang and big-crunching processes will read inversely from left to right and right to left:
Big crunch→nnn Gravitational Energy<=>nnPhotons<=>nElectrons<=>Nucleons<=>Atoms←Big-bang
I Horizon: Max. Energy particles x Min. Time form: The age of light.
Light is a pure wave of electromagnetic space, the Euclidean space we see, a structure of lineal energy, without hardly any mass, since it doesn’t close its form into a vortex cycle . When it does so as a photon, its spin is the minimal quantic h-action of temporal energy of our World. Those photons "feed" on gravitational temporal energy, as they "deform" and warp it, reproducing a wave of new photons, and vice versa, when they ‘die’ they return its energy to the gravitational space, provoking the quantic expansion and implosion of the Universe. But we will never know if the total Universe expands or contracts, as we cannot measure all the quantic parts of the Universe.
II Horizon. E=T: balance between energy and form: the electronic age.
Electrons are dense clouds of photons, evolved as informative particles. They are balanced forms in which neither energy nor information dominates. The electron is the first cyclical form that closes into itself, anchored in a relative resting frame of reference, unlike light in constant movement. And so it is the first particle with a significant temporal mass, which proves that a mass is not a material but a formal concept: a rotating vortex in dynamic terms, a dimensional folding of gravitational energy with a stable central knot of temporal information in its static description.
The electron fluctuates between a spatial and a temporal state: it adopts its maximum mass-form when captured as the body of a quark in a cyclical atomic orbital; but it acquires a linear speed, closer to the behaviour of light when it is free as an electrical flow in organic herds. Their quantic numbers describe their organic, energetic and informative cycles. The main number describes its energetic-spatial volume, as it feeds on light and enlarges its spatial orbit. The other numbers describe its informative and reproductive cycles, as it vibrates and spins, absorbing or emitting electro-magnetic information. The Pauli Principle describes its social laws, which are ruled by the ‘3rd postulate of relative equality’.
Max. T: III horizon: Max. in-form-ation. Nucleons and quarks: bidimensional fields of mass.
From an organic perspective the nucleon has 3 “internal, organic networks/dimensions”, as any Fractal Organism does, one for each quark and flow of gluons that connect its interrelated parts. Hence it is impossible to break a nucleon in 3 quarks as we can’t break a human being in its 3 physiological networks. The quark becomes in this manner a ‘physiological knot’ within the nucleon organism, pegged through ‘gluon networks’ and hence indivisible, as we can’t split the brain and nervous networks from an organism. So what happens when we bomb that system is that the gluon system, ‘the blood and nervous system’, absorbs the extra energy we feed with and reproduces more quarks. That is why probably if we destroy those bosons we will observe quarks separated because we will have destroyed the physiological networks of the nucleon and perhaps made a ‘quark bomb’, in which the enormous mass of those gluons becomes destroyed as pure energy as we liberate the lesser electromagnetic energy of an atom when we break it.
From an informative perspective, the quark is a dimension/particle that evolved socially in a triad to create a nucleon, which also has 2 dual states. Extended in space the nucleon is a proton+electron. As a time particle it is a neutron. Both are the organic units that more often appear in ‘our world’. So we will depart in our analyses from the nucleon scale, the forms with maximal cyclical mass and minimal linear movement and speed of our light world, compared with electrons and photons (max.T=min.E). And hence the last evolutionary phase of matter. Let us study those 3 horizons.