THE INNER AND OUTER DIMENSIONS OF THE UNIVERSE

Quantic Spaces-Times implies the co-existence of discontinuous worlds with multiple dimensions, which are relative ‘organic networks’ of energy and information. Thus more complex particles have more dimensions. Further on, since organisms are dual, made with temporal particles and spatial fields, there is a constant creation of spatial dimensions uncoiled from the inner form of particles that ‘unpack’ information into energy fields and vice versa: fields of forces ‘bend’ into inner particle dimensions. In the graph, we consider that process from the dual perspective of ‘informative dimensionality’ and ‘energetic strength’, as particles that pack more dimensions into less space have more ExT force. And so we describe the big-bang in terms of dimensions, as the dimensional unpacking of the initial singularity and its dense vortex of high ‘temperature’ - of huge rotational and vibration speed - into particles and forces of diminishing temporal dimensionality and growing spatial reach and vice versa: we can unify all those forces and particles into a single force-form when we reach back to the original high speeds of vibration of an ultra-dense, multi-dimensional hyper-black hole.

1. Singularities, its dimensions, ternary structure and paradoxes.  
Duality of space and time states implies that all fixed spatial perception of reality can be substituted by a dynamic one. So when I see a fixed form I imagine its dynamic cycles and vice versa, when I see a flow I imagine its static form. But most people consider only one perspective as ‘real’. So they might be surprised that after considering a mass ‘a cyclical, accelerating vortex in perpetual movement’ and the big-bang the explosion of that vortex into a flat surface of lineal energy, we can study the same process in terms of ‘fixed dimensions’, as we will do now. However a dimension is also a flowing network, a distance is also a speed. And both concepts are parallel, depending on how we perceive it as a fixed or dynamic process. For example, a vortex of mass that creates a 3rd dimension of height as it speeds inwards can be considered in dimensional terms a bidimensional surface that ‘warps’ those 2 dimensions of energy into 2 dimensions of information: a height dimension and a quantic, cyclical dimension of rhythmic movement. In the case of a black hole, this is known to happen in its abstract equations and the visual images we have of them. So if we can explain in dynamic terms, the events of physical space as transformations of cyclical movements and flows of information into lineal movements and flows of energy, we can explain all those events in static space as transformations of energy dimensions warped into informative ones. Since energetic and informative dimensions are also created and destroyed. In those terms, the big-bang cycle is a dimensional transformation of the inner, informative dimensions of a hyper-black hole into external dimensions of spatial energy. In the previous graph, if we extend a force on a space with more dimensions it looses informative density since it has to occupy a wider surface. In general, we can consider that a force extended over a surface with one more dimension is 1040 times lighter; which is approximately the ratio between electromagnetic and gravitational forces. Since ‘light’ probably packs that number of gravitational quanta into its inner form. The same concept applies to the next scales of form: electrons and nucleons pack light and gravitation into denser, heavier, stronger fields. And black holes pack nucleons into inner dimensions . So mass increases, as a particle packs in fewer dimensions a certain spatial field. Hence light is lighter than electrons that are lighter than nucleons. Yet paradoxically those dimensions are still there, inside the particle that has a more complex inner world. So those ‘inner dimensions’ can explode at any time, creating again a new external spatial field of enormous force.
The graph shows in the left side the dimensional, fixed perspective of the creation of the Universe, in the right side the dynamic explanation using the ‘energetic parameters’ of the main forces of the Universe that ‘pack magically’ together inside the singularity when the parameters of the Universe coincide with the ‘energy/mass density’ of that singularity.

2. Particles, fields or dimensions? The dimensional law.
We already defined 3 horizons of growing information that created 3 scales of physical ecosystems : the micro-world of strings and sub-particles, the atomic world to which we belong and the macro-world of astronomical bodies. It is very likely that those 3 worlds are only a part of the total informative scales of reality as they are just the upper and down worlds that surround mankind and so we, humans, can perceive. Yet in as much as space and time are symmetric and space extends in so vast regions we could imagine that informative time also extends in vast hierarchical systems, beyond our perceptive reach. Yet within our perception the limits of reality are the gravitational world and the hyper-Universe already studied. In those 3 scales, space-time is always quantic, a surface of points with parts that extends in hierarchical systems in those 3 i-scales as it happens in any organic system. Indeed, when we analyse physical space-time even at the smaller possible scale or Planck scale, we realize it is a ‘foam of space-time quanta’. In each new scale of size, we observe beings made of points organized by networks of energy and information that create topographic 4-dimensional planes: particles, atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, societies, stars, galaxies, etc. The Non-AE structure of all space-times is the strongest prove of Quantic Spaces-Times, which merely ‘re-orders’ according to the Principle of Correspondence the jungle of information and competing theories on space-time AE-physics have developed, making them all partial cases of the wider Non-AE reality. Let us then trace a conceptual blue print for the Unification of the main AE-Theories that Quantic Spaces-Times considers the most correct description of each of those partial Quantic Spaces-Times fields, before we describe them in more detail.
What all those theories have in common in the existence in all of them of inner dimensions within those particles that we cannot see but cause the external spatial fields of forces we perceive, either gravitational or electromagnetic forces that might implode or expand space-time between punctual particles, provoking its movement and growth or the contraction of its ‘space-distances’.
Thus if we want to resume further all those theories within the conceptual frame of Quantic Spaces-Times theory, we should consider that all of them follow the dimensional law, which applies beyond Physics, since it considers a dimension the inner network or cycle of any space-time field:

‘A higher plane of space-time, particle or informative Head, has 1=n3 inner dimensional cycles/networks more than its lower plane/body.’

That is, 1-dimensional points/particles from a higher i+1 plane of space-time are built with lower i-1 forms that become its inner quanta, distributed in 3 inner dimensional networks, that direct those quanta as they perform their own 3 energy, information and reproduction cyclical actions within the organic particle: 3i-1=1i. Yet the bigger point will also develop in the external world 3 new moving dimensional cycles as it performs its search for energy, information and reproduction with similar points. And we can see those cycles as dynamic movements in time that create a territorial ecosystem or as 3 new fixed spatial, dimensional cycles. And so we write again for the outer dimensions of the macro-point that create its outer territory: 3i=1i+1.
Obviously we can repeat those equations through multiple planes of existence and so theorists find different dimensions according to the detail of their analysis. For example, String theory studies 3 scales chained together, 3±1+3±1+3, for a total of 11 dimensions. While super-symmetry has different versions called N=1,2,3 etc. which go on adding N x (3±1) dimensions to their analysis.
So how many dimensions have the forces and particles of the 2 worlds of light and gravitation?
An important tool to define the dimensions and geometry of those particles and bosonic waves is their Quantic Spaces-Times equation, the boson/fermion inversion that defines all external forces to the atom called bosons (gravitons and photons) as particles or dimensions exchanged by more complex particles called fermions that emit them from their inner dimensions.
For example, ‘one-dimensional black holes’ have in fact 4 more inner dimensions, as physicists have found, that mimic the galactic Universe in which we live, as the brain’s neurons mimic the body in which they exist. So when black holes extend those inner dimensions they indeed create big-bangs that give birth to galaxies and Universes.
Also quarks seem pointsto us, ; but they can develop an external 3 dimensional space-time field, its electronic body, which we, electronic minds, perceive as our ‘Euclidean space-time’.
On the other hand, those 3 dimensional electronic spaces have 2 dimensional inner worlds that they can develop into their body, as they create bidimensional, perpendicular electromagnetic fields. Those dimensions are the memorial information of the external world accumulated in the inner, bosonic minds of those particles. Since those masses or charges are relative ‘informative brains’ that have inner space-time fields they extend or absorb as their relative bodies. However to create an external multi-dimensional world you need to have an equal number of dimensions inside. So 2 dimensional photons which exist in a 3 dimensional external World and 1-dimensional gravitons, which exist in a 4 dimensional gravitational Universe cannot create those external worlds in which they exist, far more complex in form than they are. Gravitons cannot emit dimensions; they are pure external space-time in itself. While bidimensional photons can only become electrons when they gather in huge social groups with maximum energy. So there is a natural ‘division’ between temporal particles with more inner dimensions than external dimensions and spatial particles with less inner dimensions than the external world that roughly we equal with the physicist’s division of particles between ‘fermions’ or ‘temporal masses and charges’ Vs bosons’ or ‘spatial forces’. Light and gravitation are bosons are spatial particles that ‘accumulate’ in dense packs that originate those fermions. While quarks and electrons are packed informative fermions, mass vortices that cannot accommodate new fermions easily as they are already, very dense in the dimension of information.
In that regard, quarks and gluons, the inner components of nucleons cannot be described with precision, as they have never been seen. On my opinion the existence of 3 quarks, joined by gluon flows, which are a kind of very dense strings of energy that combine to form the basic particles of our light-world show an underlying ternary structure within nucleons as in any other Fractal Organism, composed of quarks knots (the hearts and brains of the system) and bosonic flows of temporal energy (the veins and nerves of the system). Thus we can’t see quarks as different entities as we can’t see your brain or heart separated from your blood and nervous systems.
Quarks and gluons ultimately structure a nucleon in a way we have not observed. It is in that sense, safer to start our description of the big-bang in the nucleon clearly perceived by AE-science. In that regard a black hole is probably made of a gluon-quark soup at cellular level and at its ‘amino acid’ level of even smaller forms, Planck’s areas, gravitational S-T units called by most scientists, gravitons. In any case, what we know is that there was an organic soup either of superfluid quarks or nucleons in the primordial Universe, similar to the carbohydrate soup created in the Earth in its earlier stages of life but much more active as it seems that energy and information, cyclical and lineal movements, transform each other much faster and reproduce infinite varieties on that micro-world. Somehow in that variety of potential life the nucleon became the dominant form, as it indeed combines an informative network, that abstract scientists call an ‘up quark’, an energetic network that scientists call a ‘down quark’ that constantly transform into each other . In that regard the 3 fundamental quarks (and its antiquarks) that suffice to explain the Universe can be considered as the ‘3 dimensions’ of the inner space-time of those particles. And so they were appropriately defined with ‘dimensional names’ as ‘up quark’, ‘down quark’ and ‘sideways’ quark (now called strange) with 1 ½ of the mass of the other 2. While other particles are ‘odd’ forms, made with quarks and antiquarks that annihilate each other or non balanced E/T proportions. So the n-p pair, the nucleon became dominant and reproduced over those quarks and gluons creating the future nuclei of atoms, bidimensional forms of a hyperbolic space-time, homologous to the informative center of a Non-EA point.
Those worlds are studied by 2 fundamental theories, Gauge theory that studies electromagnetism and its charges and Einstein’s General Relativity that studies gravitation and its masses.
Since most of the elements of those theories are perfectly explained in its classic formulations and we already treated their AE-errors in their interpretation of quantic uncertainty and Quantic Relativity, we will consider here the main theme that puzzles physicists: the nature of the inner dimensions of strings, nucleons and black holes, the dominant particles of the 3 scales of the Universe. Since all of them emit from within the fields of spatial forces that allow those beings to interact and create bigger network structures. Yet physicists can’t see those dimensions, since any Fractal Organism of any space-time is discontinuous, and so we cannot see their internal world. So they have devised many competing Space-time theories to explain theoretically the inner parts of those points. What quantic space-time theory does is to reduce that mass of theories to those which do not contradict Quantic Spaces-Times laws, and then relate them as specific descriptions of the 3x4 fundamental types of particles and forces of the Non-AE Universe, split from the initial singularity as it expanded in space and slowed down in time.
In that regard, Quantic Spaces-Times theory simplifies enormously and explains the why of the inner physical dimensions that AE-physics finds in all the main particles of the Universe. Let us then consider those theories from the Quantic Spaces-Times perspective before we conclude our analysis of the Hyper-black hole that unpacked 4 ST dimensions, creating our Universe.

3. Conception: Quantic theories of space-time.

All knots of temporal energy process only a part of the total volume of information of the Universe. The rest is dark space. In the graph, a point with parts has an inner, 3-dimensional space protected by an external membrane, which Physicists describe with different dimensional theories, particles and forms. We will consider briefly those dimensional theories in the understanding that the reader knows its mathematical and conceptual apparatus, correcting and adapting them to Quantic Spaces-Times. Since those theories, which are essentially correct, require however some basic conceptual corrections.

Let us summarize them from the smallest to the biggest Quantic Spaces-Times they define:
- String Theory describes the inner dimensions of Fractal Organisms, considering that each point of the Universe is either a space line or a time cycle. And each of those time cycles, as shown in the previous graph, have an inner space-time with 9 to 11 dimensions, in accordance with the quantic, ternary principle . Those points form a discontinuous network of space-time or brane joined by energy forces or lineal strings. Thus String Theory explains with the basic forms of Non-AE geometry, the line and the cycle, the smallest, Planck’s scale of reality. Yet it makes 3 AE-errors:
- It regards all mathematical solutions as certain when only the most efficient forms are real . 
- It doesn’t locate properly those extra-dimensions, which are the inner, organic regions of those strings. In that regard, String Theory acknowledges that in a Universe with a higher degree of curvature those dimensions are not necessary. In other words, in the discontinuous Universe where the degree of curvature is far higher than the continuous Universe as each ‘plane of existence’ increases the total curvature of space-time, the solutions of String theory are stable within a Universe of lesser dimensions in which each string holds those extra-dimensions as gravitational quanta within its interior form.
- Finally String Theory erroneously describes the ‘substance’ of which those strings are made, in words of its discoverer as a "continuous, elastic, solid material, sort of a kind of rubber string". In Quantic Spaces-Times theory however solid, continuous forms do not exist. Thus strings are quantic, "liquid" herds and flows of the smallest known microscopic piece of space, the Planck’s length. Since the equations of liquid flows defined by their viscosity are very similar to those of elastic strings. Further on, the quantic nature of space-time and the reproductive nature of liquids define the most efficient physical systems as liquids, where energy and information are in balance (E=T), despite their appearance as solids, due to the external hard membrane that isolates them. For example, a human being is a liquid mass of water with diluted solid particles yet we see a solid because we see the skin’s membrane. In fact, we are now describing solid particles like electrons, nucleons and gluons as liquids with very low viscosity; we are exploring the amazing properties of super fluids and we are considering big-bang models based on gluon-quark liquids.
- When we enter into our scale of atomic particles, the oldest extra-dimensional theory was created, departing from Einstein’s Relativity by Kaluza and Klein, which unified the gravitational and electromagnetic field, considering electromagnetism a force that comes out of each point of the Einsteinian 4-dimensional space-time, with an internal cyclical volume of temporal energy or 5th dimension, whose fluctuation, angular rotation and absorption and emission of temporal energy through its ‘mouth’, creates the electromagnetic field. Those points act as cyclical spheres with an aperture that rotates and absorbs temporal energy, enlarging or diminishing their radius, creating in the process the potential energy of the electromagnetic field. So K&K described the inner content of temporal energy of a non-AE charge that becomes transformed into spatial energy, a field of force, when the points emits it to make its external cycles.
- Yet those inner parts of a Fractal Organism are ±1=n3 networks that can be considered in detail as 4 different inner dimensions. It is what the N=1 super symmetry theory does. Since it gives a closer view to microscopic ‘fermion particles’ (quarks and electrons that appear as pointless objects to scientists). And it considers that all have inner spaces called ‘spinors’, with 4 inner dimensions, which are symmetric to the 4 dimensions of the external ‘bosonic’ light-space in which we exist. So super-symmetry describes the duality and equivalence between the external spatial field-bodies of a particle and its internal time dimensions, invisible to us, as we exist in the external, discontinuous electromagnetic world of the Universe...
- The theory with the smallest number of dimensions is the holographic principle that rightly describes information as bidimensional . Physicists apply the holographic principle to study pure informative particles, either the quark, the central, informative singularity of atoms or the black hole, the central singularity of galaxies. Which they define as a bidimensional, hyperbolic field with a mass point, either a quark or a black hole, which has no gravitation within its interior.It is what physicists call an anti-De Sitter space with negative curvature. Yet the geometrical error in Holographic Theories arises from an incomplete understanding of the 2 ‘invisible’ limits of a Fractal Organism, its membrane and central singularity. Since they have wrongly exchanged their geometrical places. For example, when the holographic principle describes gluons and quarks as a bidimensional field with negative spatial curvature, it places them in the wrong region of a Fractal Organism: in the external membrane. Yet quarks and black holes are physical objects that we find in the negative, curved temporal, central region of Non AE atoms and galaxies. They are the particles that fill the inner, informative hyperbolic ‘Belgrami’ cone of those Non-AE space-times, a zone in which, as the Holographic Principle has found, they do not suffer the gravitational force. Since in all vortices, once we cross their inner radius beyond the vortex radius, in the ‘eye of the hurricane’, all is quiet. Yet when we ad a perpendicular outwards dimension of height to a bidimensional quark-black hole, it appears a gravity force, similar to a bathtub dragging water which creates its height dimension. Thus both, atoms and galaxies become dual systems with an external membrane of positive curvature, a ‘De-Sitter space-time’ that drags towards the central tube, its inverse ‘Anti De Sitter space-time’, all particles coming from the external world, creating in the middle and intermediate space-time in which gravitation is felt. The same structure explains both the atom and the galaxy, a vortex of electromagnetic stars, which have in its center a black hole, the cause of the vortex, a singularity with height. Thus, once the geometrical error is corrected, the Holographic principle becomes a good description of the central, informative singularity of a physical Fractal Organism and the way in which it emits information: the informative, height fluctuations of those central singularities occupied by a mass or a charge, a bidimensional field existing in a hyperbolic space, create a bosonic wave, extracted from its ‘h’- cellular elements (Heisenberg Principle ). In this manner charges emit a photon with an electric high field that extracts energy out of a bidimensional perpendicular, wide, magnetic field, related to the gravitational inner or outer space of the fermion. While the cyclical rotation of a charge, mass or spin creates an electromagnetic or gravitational vortex that rises a dimension of height. So black holes drag masses through its height dimensions; and charges create vortices that physicists call a ‘Maxwell screw’, which drag a magnetic field that implodes (Min. T) as the charge accelerates (Max.E) balancing the total space and time of the event.
Finally the most important theories are those that describe the spaces, forces and temporal particles that interact in our human atomic scale, Relativityand Gauge Theory .. that we analyse in other sections of this book.
So those 6 theories explain fully the structure of the physical Universe, describing its non-EA points with different mathematical tools and degrees of detail, once the proper corrections are established through the understanding of the cyclical, quantic Non AE nature of its inner space-times. Since in a relative, quantic world each non-AE one-dimensional point can be seen in detail as a point with 1=3 inner dimensions, one extra-dimension arises when we see the point in broad strokes, and n(3±1) dimensions when we see the inner point in detail (as in string and super symmetric theories). Finally when we study a very big point  of a macro-Universe we obtain space-times with more than 4 dimensions, as in the penta-dimensional description of black holes.
Since physicists understand height in Euclidean terms as a spatial dimension and use continuous concepts of space-time, the nature and location of the extra-dimensions of all those particles confuses them. Yet once those dimensions are properly reordered and located, we can relate all those theories in a single sentence that defines physical space-times:

“The 2 dimensions of temporal information (described by the holographic principle) curve a bidimensional sheet of space into a 4 dimensional space-time (described by General Relativity), breaking it in quantic herds composed of 2 ‘fermion particles’, the temporal quark and the spatial electron (whose secondary organic combinations are described by the so-called SU3 model Gauge theory, according to the main Quantic Spaces-Times inversions and symmetries) that hold inside 4 inner dimensions (described by the simplest N=1 super-symmetry and aggregated as a single dimension by Kaluza and Klein), whichoriginate the external electromagnetic field that feeds on the gravitational space-time Universe (explained by the equations of General Relativity), establishing herds of liquid, lineal forces, organized in topographic, bidimensional networks, from atoms to stars (called strings and branes by String Theories).”

4. The unfolding of the Universe. Metaphysics. The constants of God.
But where those bosons are placed? In simple, geometrical tiny 4 dimensional forms in which we see the 2 dimensions of time, height and cyclical rhythm it is obvious that they occupy the geometric dimensions of time. So when we move into more complex 5-dimensional objects like black holes, we should consider that those bosons also pack in the 5th dimension of time from future to past.  Both the conceptual and mathematical description of that 5th dimension goes beyond the limits of this book as it opens many questions difficult to resolve even for an experienced Quantic Spaces-Times theorists. Yet they seem to indicate that black holes might be forms that extend from future to past; hence they could process future light radiation into past dark energy, emitted simultaneously through quantic jumps in time, in far away regions of space maintaining in this manner the entire Universe into an eternal present. Then we can deal with the quantic limits of the big-bang both in time and space. That is, not only the Universe collapses when its spatial energy is absorbed by the hyper-black hole, but also collapses when the temporal age of the black holes collapses its form. And since time and space are symmetric both processes are parallel, hence the enormous numbers of numerical symmetries we find between the values of the spatial parameters of the Universe and its temporal values (for example, in the measures of its radius in light-space and its ages in light-time).
It is then obvious that bosons pack themselves in a point of space, as they create a new dimension of time and vice versa; since dimensions of time hardly occupy any space they often become translated into ‘density parameters’. Then, the hyper-black hole singularity should be an organism of 10nx10 bosonic quarks packed in its 5th dimension of informative time that unpacked in a reproductive wave of quarks during its big-bang death, origin of the initial gluon-quark soup. And today the new ‘soul’ of the Universe will be a bosonic worm hole, perhaps a remain of that old Universe and central knot of a new body created with those 10¹⁰ xn nucleons, which can fill potentially the Universal cell from its center to its membrane. To understand those bosonic quarks beyond its mathematical description, it is necessary to return to Aristotle’s Metaphysics with his differentiation between essence and potency. Planck made his translation to quantum physics defining the potential density of gravitational information or mass that can exist in a region of the Universe, the Planck’s density of 10(up to 96) kg/m3, that he called the ‘constant of God’ or maximum space-time density of logic in-form-ation the vacuum energy can hold, curve and form. In abstract Relativity we would talk of a maximum degree of ‘warping’ of energy into information; in  bio-physics we could explain that warping as the limit of existential force for any being of the Universe. It should be the mass-density of the strongest Universal singularity. And it is enormous, far superior to the density of a galactic black hole, the top predator informative form we know. Compared to the immense existential capacity of that hypothetical being, we men are empty bubbles, ghosts of space-time.
- In Religious, philosophical terms, we could even interpret the Bible as a description of the big-bang, which probably was the reason why its discoverer, Lemaitre, was a catholic priest: ‘And God said there is light, and he split light from dark energy’ we might say, paraphrasing the Bible. Yet it is far more revealing its philosophical analysis in terms of Aristotelian Metaphysics: the singularity was God because it was the unmoved one, since indeed, it weighted so much that all turned around him, all was his energy, dust of space-time . But in bio-physical terms, in a dynamic Universe that never rests the energetic voracity of that unmoved God is the cause of its cyclical death, as once it has absorbed all energy and transformed into form, it can’t evolve further, dying back in an explosion of energy that reverses time-information back into vacuum space. The Hindi said that after the Universal Kali Yuga, the age of death, Vishnu, the organic system of the Universe, rests potentially in the nothingness of vacuum, the phase of pure energy.
The Universe is a place with a huge potential density of temporal energy in each of its points, but very few points reach that potentiality in dimensions and density. We are mostly ghosts hardly printed on the vacuum energy. This confuses AE-physicists, since they have found that enormous energy in the vacuum and can’t see it. And yet in the same way we don’t see quarks and gravitation and yet we know it exists, we have to accept that gravitational singularity perceives that information, absorbs it and constructs with it the logic shape of its mind. But how far reaches that perception?  Does the absolute God or universal center perceive with an ultra thin gravitational force all what exists in time and space, in a simultaneous present of enormous density? Further on, we could consider metaphysical questions on the difference between the enormous potential energy of the vacuum and its real energy, which is the one we ghosts of space-time perceive. It is for God, the brain of the Universe and its most evolved gravitational beings also real the potential energy of the vacuum? This would mean that the dark space is filled with invisible ‘real forms’, all the other possible worlds and games of existence that co-exist in the same point of space, in different regions of time. Since we are in a theoretical, invisible world the possibilities are endless. For example, since gravitational forces are informative forces and past and future co-exist together it could be possible to consider that the past and the future would weight and the 5th dimension we know exist in black holes, would be a dimension of time with gravitational weight that such God perceives. Then Everett and Dirac and Saint Augustine could be right: all the parallel Universes that might exist do exist (Everett’s solution); all nucleons moving to the future will have its invisible anti-nucleons moving to the past (the dual particles of Dirac); and the black hole God would perceive all those worlds from past to future and future to past, potential and invisible to us, real to him, who perceives with the qualities of Saint Augustine’s God: eternity, ubiquity, instantaneity, knowledge of past, present and future. So the Universe is the ‘body’ (biological jargon) or ‘field of forces’ (physical jargon) of the hyper-black hole singularity (Physical jargon), brain (biological jargon) or soul-mind (metaphysical jargon) that perceives it. But a brain not only perceives its body but acts in an external ecosystem… 
Indeed, the existence of multiple hierarchical scales in all organic systems opens the door to consider reality beyond the Universal membrane that limits the Universal body at macro-scale and within the bosonic quarks of its soul that limits our perception at micro-scale; and postulate a hyper-Universe of which our Universe is a mere ‘cell’ which extends according to the ternary principle in 2 new i±1 scales beyond our ‘i-Universe’: the hyper-Universe and the micro-world within quarks. Those 2 fields of analysis are today the hottest frontiers of Cosmology and Physics that talk in abstract of the ‘inflationary Universe’ and the extra-dimensions of particles; and Quantic Spaces-Times explain in organic terms. Since in the 3 i±1 scales appears in fact the magic number of a perfect organic system, Et=1010-11. In the Universe, 10¹¹ is in years light the limit of life of light, our space-time; the limit of spatial reach of a gravitational wave that creates the simultaneous present, organic Universe; hence the radius of the universal body membrane. In the i+1 scale is the number of Universal cells that create the Hyper-Universe. And in the i-1 scale 10¹⁰ n is the number of n-dimensional quanta of its inner spaces. Yet to understand those inner spaces we have to consider briefly, how ‘reality’ prints itself in the minimal scale of spatial energy and temporal masses in which the explosion of the hyper-universe occurred, the level of lineal strings and spin vortices.

23. The model of String and Spin Theory: its errors and virtues.
 The Min. scale of quantic temporal information and spatial energy in the Universe is beyond human direct, empirical perception, at quantum level, in the border between the invisible gravitational world of dark energy and the light Universe that feeds on gravitation. Physicists describe that quantic world of space-time in the Planck scale of 10^-35 m. with 2 theories that we unify conceptually in this chapter as part of the same organic system of non-EA space-time:
- String Theory that explains those minimal S/T forms as a series of time points that form "membranes", united by energy strings, moving between them and…
- Quantum gravity that puts the accent not so much on the energy Strings that tie those membranes but in the knots of gravitational information, which structure the membranes, called "mass spins". They are obviously, the 2 elements of an organic system of space/time according to our duality, where the spins are the time knots of a quantic network and the Strings the lines of energy. Only Aristotelian unicausality has differentiated both theories, which are needed to explain the S/T quantic network that underlies reality. So we merge both theories through the parameters and jargons of Quantic Spaces-Times. That fusion of both theories is possible when we correct the 4 most common errors of abstract sciences, which concern the ±1=S3 elements of the Universal ternary grammar:
- E: The energy error: String Theory puts its emphasis in the energy strings instead of the fixed time points that structure those membranes (an error corrected in the last years, that it has allowed "to restart" a theory that was stagnating).
- i: The informative, inflationary error: Abstract science considers the mathematical language, 'the language of God' (Galileo); and so it considers all mathematical theoretical structures real, which allows infinite different non-observed String forms and up to 10500 possible types of Universes, made with those different Strings. Yet all languages, including mathematics, are inflationary, as information can provide multiply perspectives on any physical energy it observes. Yet String Theory is an A-scientific, ‘platonic theory’ that accepts all mathematical equations, ‘written in the language of God’ as certain. So it predicts an almost infinite number of adjacent Universal-bubbles, with different densities, forms, sizes and additional dimensions, one for each ‘inflationary equation’. Yet, in the same way we can create infinite verbal sentences which are syntactically correct to describe a single event with inflationary, verbal information, many of them false; we can create infinite correct mathematical equations that won’t reflect the single empirical reality. That is why the biological model and the geometrical laws of Non-AE geometry are relevant: they limit the possible solutions to only those that fit within an organic model. In other words, since most organisms are made up with similar cells, most Universes will have similar physical constants and particles. As most human beings have a limited number of different cells.
-<=>: The error of space/time continuity: The error of continuity, in the case of Theory of Strings explains why physicists do not know the substance of those Strings, they describe as made of a "continuous, elastic, solid material, sort of a kind of rubber string". In fact is not the Min. unit of space is not a string, but very likely a quantic "liquid" made of herds and flows of the smallest known microscopic piece of space, the Planck length. Since the equations of liquid flows defined by their viscosity are very similar to those of elastic Strings.
-+1: The unicausal error. All studies of any organic system requires the analysis of the system from the perspective of its temporal knots of information, in this case the spins of mass, studied by Quantic Gravity, and its energy networks, in this case the Strings that communicate the spins, studied by String Theory. Thus when we use the dual analysis, we obtain the whole picture of quantic s/t, unifying both theories.
So when we consider Strings as flows of quantic space when they adopt a lineal form and consider them minimum vortices of time/mass when they adopt a cyclical form we can merge String Theory and Theory of the Quantum Gravitation through the properties of space-time quantic systems into a single network that underlies all reality. Since, once we have clarified those 3 epistemological errors, Theory of Strings and Quantum Gravity becomes the geometric description, the 'how' of a quantic S/T microcosmic network extended over a macrocosmic surface that encompasses the entire Universe. No wonder then that Theory of Strings has prevailed in modern Physics over other exotic theories of reality. Since the adaptation of String Theory to Theory of quantic space/time, given the complexity of its mathematical description, goes well beyond this book, we will not solve in detail those 3 errors. Instead we have already considered how the organic perspective simplified the 'forest' of geometric, abstract mathematical species, not only in String Theory but also in Quantic Theory, where we find also an enormous quantity of theoretical particles of which we cannot have empirical evidence given its microcosmic size. Let us consider, once we have clarified those 3 errors, the "5 pillars of the String Theorist faith" according to his discoverer, and their homologies with the pillars of organic systems of space/time to show that homology:
- The lightest Strings are cut in smaller pieces of about 10^-35 m. This irreducible length is a new constant of nature introduced by String Theory, similar to the speed of light, C, or the Planck Constant, h. It plays a crucial role in all aspects of String Theory and establishes a finite limit to magnitudes that in other way could become zero or infinite. That size is, in fact, the minimum size of gravitational space/time in quantum gravity. All this is in accordance with quantic, organic S/T, showing the existence of a 'border' or discontinuity between both worlds, the Universe of light and gravitation in the infinite scale of I-forms. We conclude that a String is the minimum piece of light space/time in the border with "the gravitational" world that probably establishes even smaller limits of form since gravitons seem to have at that size still a compound inner forms.
- Quantic Strings might have angular moment although they lack mass. In classic physics, angular moment is a property of an object that turns with respect to an axis. The formula of angular moment multiplies speed, mass and distance to the axis; therefore, an object without mass cannot have angular moment. But in Quantic Spaces-Times, a mass is a vortex of energy that anchors reality around it. So a cyclical string that 'spins' around, becomes the min. mass vortex that in the next growing scale will turn, already with mass in a wider vortex (as a whip top does), in which the 3 elements of angular moment are already in place. Those smallish spins cause the quantum fluctuations that make the continuous space-time of Einstein a foam of quantic, organic bits and bites of energy and temporal information. Further on in String Theory those cyclical spins can acquire up to 2 units of angular momentum, h, without gaining mass, which happens to be the spin of the graviton, the particle that 'compresses' space-time with its gravitational vortex closing the gap between big masses. Thus the cyclical string is the first "mass", the minimum time cycle created with a dual spinning vortex, composed of 2 ‘h’ lengths of temporal energy, just in the border between the light and gravitational world. That spin, when turning again will create wider rotations that will add dimensions and angular moment, increasing its Quantic Spaces-Times mass - a vortex that transforms and implodes spatial extension into cyclical time, compressing space and attracting masses separated by that space-distance.
- What takes us to the 3rd pillar of String Theory: Strings seem to demand the existence of extra dimensions, in addition to the three usual ones… never found. Why? Because those extra dimensions are not infinite in quantic space/time but rather the internal, organic dimensions/networks of any Non-AE space/time. Thus as you have internal dimensions/networks within your inner microcosms that should be added to the abstract, external dimensions of your macrocosmic ecosystem, string as a point with parts will have similar inner networks/dimensions. In particular, the equations that describe the vibration of those Strings become incoherent unless space/time is either very curved or it contains six extra space dimensions. This second solution is the one accepted traditionally by string theorists because, without understanding quantic space/time they think that space is EA, lineal, without curvature. But quantic space differentiates from continuous space, because is enormously is curved. As each quantic non-EA space divides in 3 sub-spaces, membrane, inner space and singularity, each one with 3 sub-zones. Hence it has 3x3 times more curvature than an EA abstract space. Exactly the extra-dimensions of String Theory. Or in other words, if we consider the Ternary Principle that describes the 3 relative organic scales of any being in the Universe, each one with 3 inner, organic networks/dimensions, we find those 9 dimensions of String Theory, solving its greatest mystery.
- In 4th place, the S/T constants that appear in the equations of physics and determine the properties of Nature , no longer have arbitrary and fixed values. They appear in String Theory as fields, similar to an electromagnetic field that fits its values dynamically. Thus they can have different values at different cosmological times or in remote regions of space/time. It is exactly the same variability that suffer the physical constants of any Quantic Spaces-Times field in 3 ages, as the proportion of energy and information of any species vary. Thus, the observation of any variation on those constants would provide an enormous impulse both to the String Theory and quantic space/time; but unfortunately a proportional variation of those Universal constants, given the immense age of the Universe is difficult to perceive.
- Finally, quantic Strings display some surprising symmetries called dualities, which are the same dualities we have found in Quantic Spaces-Times Theory, validating each other’s conclusions:
        - The duality of lineal and cyclical strings that suffice to explain all particles is equivalent to the duality of cyclical time and lineal energy.
       -The T-duality between microcosms and macrocosms that String theory considers homologous is due to the repetition of Quantic Spaces-Times laws in each scale of existence made of space-time ..26-28).
        - The time-space duality of String theory is at the core of Quantic Spaces-Times theory. Since both have found that for each spatial explanation of reality there is an anti-symmetric, ‘perpendicular’ Time perspective. Thus besides the evolutionary Universe, exists that same Universe as a fixed form, perceived from the spatial perspective of super luminal gravitation, which ‘transforms’ the 3 horizons of the big-bang in the 3 zones of its Non-AE Structure.
In that regard both the inflationary Universe, proposed in 1994 independently from my organic model, proposed the same year and the recent versions proposed by String Theory speak all of them of the same structural form that Quantic Spaces-Times fields. Thus since the 3 theories have reached the same conclusions coming from different perspectives, they prove by the linguistic method the homologous truth of  the 3 models that describe with different jargons the same Universe.