THE 3 SCALES OF THE UNIVERSE.
The illogic structure in time of a Fractal Organism can be considered from 2 different perspectives. The simplest one is the analysis of its ages between birth and extinction that complete the generational cycle of the being. Yet there is a 2nd level of complexity in the study of time; the analysis of the hierarchical structures between relative forms of future with higher TxE existential force, and forms of past, that latter structure themselves into organic systems across ternary planes of existence. In the Universe we can recognize many of those structures, starting by the most obvious division into particles of 3 physical scales: quantic particles, atomic forms and celestial bodies.
Systems organize in 3 hierarchical according to its quantity of temporal information. So if we consider those 3 scales of physical reality, a quantic world or micro-universe appears in the scale of quantic strings of the Planck size of 10-35 m.; the atomic world is our scale, and the celestial bodies are the cosmological scale. And in those 3 scales the S-T duality shows the existence of 3 dominant temporal temporal cycles: cyclical strings, nucleons (made with 3 quark networks) and black holes; and its 3 lineal, spatial forces are opened, lineal strings, light waves and gravitational forces.
Each bigger scale seems to be made of very dense condensates of quantic, smaller forms called ‘bosonic states’ ; which are the equivalent in the physical world to the ‘organic state’ of a group of cells that acquire maximum order and simultaneity with minimal friction.
So black holes are probably made up of a super fluid bosonic mass of nucleons, which seem to be a bosonic superfluid of cyclical strings. So there are 3 scales of biophysical complexity, 3 vortices of relative mass, going from the hyper-dense cosmological macro-black holes to the nucleon realm to the Planck size of strings. And those 3 growing particles are huge aggregates of the inferior scale, as any complex system is an aggregate of smaller quantic space-time cells. For example, in the biological realm, there are also 3 levels, the cellular level, the organism and the social level. And men are an aggregate of 1012 cells; while the bigger scale, Humanity, is an aggregate of ±1010 human beings. Though most of those numerical relationships are difficult to prove, the constant repetition in the 3 biophysical scales of the basic quantic number 10 n x 10-11, where 1010 cellular units spread across n-dimensions or i-scales to create a bigger organic system, show clearly that those biophysical scales follow also the laws of organic systems ruled by the magic numbers of Quantic Spaces-Times fields. For example, in the biophysical realm most mathematical models describe black holes with a Planck’s mass, √hc/G, of 10±20 protons. In other words those hyper-black holes seem to be in ‘organic terms’, a bidimensional condensate of 1010 nucleons, made of ternary quark networks... And since, recently physicists have recognized as we affirmed in our booksthat quarks and bosons form a bidimensional network of space-time spread on a Non-AE informative singularity of negative curvature, and the same bidimensional model has been proved for black holes the conclusion is that the 3 scales of ‘perfect’ top predator species in the quantic, atomic and cosmological realm are the informative part of a Non-AE point:
‘Cyclical strings, nucleons and black holes are imploding, temporal, bidimensional vortices with negative curvature that create informative height as they absorb, condensate and attract spatial forces, lineal strings, electromagnetic forces and gravitational flows in their E>T, life arrow, creating ‘warped points of time’ of enormous informative density. And inversely, when they die, T<E, through the arrow of entropy, they destroy its mass emitting spatial forces’.
Worm holes are the most perfect Fractal Organisms of the cosmological scale of the Universe, similar to nucleons, the perfect singularity of our existential plane that also absorb ‘radiant electronic temporal energy’ coming from its electronic membranes and emit it as ‘magnetic’ information. The equations of black holes show also their horizon as a bidimensional field that has the maximum informative entropy of the Universe, since it reduces matter to its ultimate units on the Planck’s scale. So to understand both, the Black hole as an organic system and its dual big-bang death either in the Universe or in a galaxy, from an organic perspective, we have to consider their structure through those 3 hierarchical scales of matter that ‘die’ in all big-bang processes and are reconstructed in the inverse big-banging, reproductive events. In the biological homology, a human being is composed of cells themselves composed of amino acids that act as the minimal unit of life. So when an organism dies it suffers 2 deaths: first its cellular tissue is broken into pieces that feed the stomach of an organism, which will destroy it till its minimal amino acid units, used to recompose its own cells. When we study black holes empirical facts suggest also a dual, inner, quantic structure that becomes destroyed in the big-bang:
- Si: The closest species to a black hole is a neutron star, composed of superfluid neutrons in a bosonic state, occupying its minimal space. Yet the difference of density between a neutron star and a black hole is small. So a black hole could be the next evolution of a neutron star with a ‘lighter’ cover of neutrons packed in a bosonic, superfluid state, with a hard nucleus of bosonic quarks.
- SS(i-1): When we analyse the thermodynamic equations of black holes they show that their feeding process destroys matter till it absorbs Planck’s areas, the minimal units of temporal energy of the physical space-time Universe, the equivalent to the amino acids that the stomach absorbs.
What are those Planck’s units? Most physicists consider them cyclical strings or gravitons, the minimal units of the world of masses.
Thus the homology between the 3 scales and sub-species of black holes explain the 3 possible scales of big-bangs, according to the space-time paradoxical inversion: Min. E=Max. T:
- Micro-black holes on the size range of the smallest cyclical strings and with the Planck’s density, would give birth to hyper-Universe.
- Universal black holes of the size of a nucleon would cause the big-bang.
- While galactic black holes on the size of stars would cause quasars, (galactic big-bangs).
It was the death of one of those black holes what triggered the Universal big-bang, as the death of a human organism happens when the neuron where all the flows of information converge to create the mind, the hierarchical summit of your organism, collapses; and the death of a kingdom happens when the king’s dynasty ends.
13. The 3 big-bangs and the different speeds of its forces.
The existence of homologous black holes, forces and structures in the 3 physical scales of the Universe with different constants of space and time, leaves unanswered 2 questions: at which scale it happened the big-bang; and at which speed move the different forces of those scales? At first glance it is very probable that the big-bang happened at the cosmological scale, but there are 2 alternative probable theories, which consider the big-bang at a higher scale, the so-called inflationary theory of a hyper-universe, latter studied in more detail , and theories that consider a big-bang at the lower galactic scale. Indeed, since what seemed to have exploded is a hyper-black hole, we might wonder if that hyper-black hole was a local black hole belonging to a galaxy. Then we have a steady state theory of the big-bang, as it has been reformulated by Sir Hoyle, in which the multiple, constant big-bangs of galaxies are responsible for the background radiation. Or we jump aHead further into a new scale, and then we have the theories of the hyper-inflationary Universe.
In that regard, we don’t even know at which scale the big-bang that caused the background radiation happened. Since some empirical data collected by WMAP favours a possible local origin to that radiation. Though most data favours a Universal big-bang based in cold, dark matter with an expansive λ, (which implies a young Universe), 2 observations favour a local background radiation: the first multipole of that radiation aligns either with the equinoxes or the movement of the solar system or the galactic plane in which Andromeda and our galaxy are placed. Thus the background radiation might be the ‘local temperature’ of the dual galactic system in which we exist.
Since the age of galaxies is close to that of the Universe, it could be possible as Fred Hoyle affirms, that big-bangs could be quantic big-bangs and the Universe would not be expanding as a whole but will exist in a steady state. Then we should study big-bang processes only at quasar scale, caused by the explosion of galaxies. This theory seems all the more attractive as it merely scraps out the hyper-Universe and its quantic, string scale that we cannot perceive and so it avoids all the problems of a hyper-Universal big-bang . It merely requires to explain in quantic terms 2 phenomena: the acceleration of light-space, which Quantic Spaces-Times theory explains locally and can be balanced by a similar number of imploding processes that create matter out of quasars. And the background radiation, which would be the isothermal temperature of the galaxy polarized by the Halo of dark matter that surrounds as a discontinuous membrane all galaxies. Future measures of that background radiation might solve the question.
Again a new problem arouses when considering the quantic scale of those Doppler effects. We cannot measure the degree of warping of the Universe as well as its expansive forces. So we do not know if the Universe is truly expanding or imploding or as I believe, near a steady state position.
The fact is that we cannot even know with total certainty if the background radiation is local or Universal or even if it comes from the hyper-Universe. Though it is most likely a cosmological phenomenon, on one side it seems to show ‘local variations’. And so it could be the background temperature of the galaxy reflected by the Halo of dark matter, the external membrane of that galaxy. Since we are observers that exist inside a closed, galactic Fractal Organism we would sense that radiation coming apparently from all the regions of the Universe even if it was coming from our galaxy. Inversely, it could be coming from outside the Universe and hence show those enormous Doppler effects as it was originally a force from a Universe with more TxE force.
Might be even possible according to the Ternary Principle that the 3 types of big-bangs happen in galaxies, universes and Hyper-Universes whose structures are homologous in many ways, but then again the 3 scales will show different ‘rates of expansion’ and ‘speeds of emission of dark matter’. For example, when we observe the big-bangs of quasars, matter seems to be expelled at 10 times the speed of light. When we observe the background radiation coming from the external Universe it shows red shifts up to 50 times the speed of light. So we might consider a decametric scale of increasingly faster, thinner forces of dark energy that go 10 times faster than light at intergalactic scale and 100 times faster than light between universal cells.
Yet even if we cannot be sure of the abstract measures of the Universe, the organic, dual death would have happen in the 3 big-bang scales, which are not mutually exclusive in Quantic Spaces-Times theory.
Let us then consider briefly, after analysing the 3 scales of matter and black holes that might have exploded in those 3 big-bangs, those 2 other possible big-bangs, which would be homologous to the Universal big-bang but at different scales of time and space.
The age of the Universe, the size of its brain and the Theory of the great Numbers.
The symmetries between those 3 scales are also backed by what physicists call the Theory of the Great Numbers – the relationships between the different ratios of age, size and strength between forces, particles and Universes, which introduces a series of metaphysical, speculative questions that fascinate the astronomer and resolve some fundamental whys on the structure of the Universe.
- One fundamental question is the age of our Universe. We don’t really know, since any organic system has a fast youth, a long mature age of balance or steady state, and a fast aging finale. Yet cosmologists calculate the age of the Universe in 13 billion years, extending its lineal big-bang equations proper of the fast youth of the Universe, which make the age of galaxies and the Universe much younger than it probably is.
For example, we know that the intermediate, mature age of spiral galaxies last much longer than we use to believe, thanks to their feeding cycle that absorbs gas and sends it to the worm hole with a mean period of 10 billion years. Yet since we have found many galaxies that seem to be in its second feeding cycle, reconstructing its spiral they should be older than the very same Universe! On the other hand the oldest spherical galaxies, which have no interstellar dust, keep on feeding by cannibalising other galaxies and so they might have exhausted several of those 1010 feeding cycles. Yet according to the inverse relationship between space and time a bigger form in space displays slower, longer cycles in time. For example, organic galaxies feed during eons and electrons feed on nanoseconds. Thus those galactic ages mean the Universe is much older.
Further on, the quantic nature of space implies that the expansion of Universal space used to calculate its life-span is local . Hence it is not a valid parameter to measure the total age of the Universe, since that expansion is balanced by the local contraction of dark energy into matter in galactic regions. So on the whole those expansions and contractions might balance and the Universe might be already in a mature, steady state.
- A 2nd question that responds to Haldane’s concept of a strange Universe is the duality between microcosms and macrocosms found both in String Theory and Quantic Spaces-Times theory, which seems to indicate an infinite scale of time, in which atoms can be Micro-Universes and Universes micro-atoms.
Take for example the Great Number’s ratio discovered by Dirac between the electromagnetic force that acts in the atomic microcosms and the gravitational force that acts in the macrocosmos, which is 1040; the same relationship found between the light-radius of the Universe in space and the light-radius of the atom. Which seems to indicate that the big-bang was indeed the explosion of a Nucleon whose spatial radius increased in the same measure that the inner electromagnetic force diluted. Or in other words, if we were hyper-giant beings, able to see the Universe from the external hyper-universe’s point of view, and measure it, it would seem to us an atom with a dense, inner force, 1040 times more intense. Thus the structure of the Universe seems to jump from micro-perfect black holes that ‘mirror’ as ‘perfect minds’ the shapes and properties of macro-perfect black holes; as String Theory also explains. Those 3 perfect i±1 scales, the micro-spins, the nucleons and the black holes, seem to be the ultimate Aristotle’s unmoved Gods, brains of the higher plane, foci of information that make fluctuate their relative galactic and Universal energy.
The Universe is hierarchical as it has always a final ‘singularity’ that takes the decisions on top. The mind-brain or singularity of those physical particles is the inner radius of its temporal vortices, called the ‘Schwarzschild singularity’ . And again, the empirical prove of a ‘Planck’s size singularity’ as the ultimate informative brain quanta of the hyper-universe and a nucleon as the singularity of the Universe is given by the Theory of Great Numbers:
The ratio between the Schwarzschild singularity of a nucleon and its outer membrane is also 1039, the same mentioned relationship we found, between the radio of the nucleon and the Universe as a whole, whose radio is about 1039 times the radio of that nucleon. So all seems to indicate that the ‘Schwarzschild singularity’ or ‘brain’ of the Universe is a bosonic nucleon, the ultimate ‘neuron’ of the central hyper-black hole that died in the big-bang. And the ultimate singularity of a nucleon is a Planck’s area, which in an ultra dense bosonic black hole could be the origin of the hyper-universe. While the ‘soul’ of a galaxy is the Black hole. Obviously according to the Black hole paradox, as a smaller chip is faster and more intelligent (Max.T=Min.S), the maximal speed of perception happens in the smaller ‘soul’. That is why the small galaxy has a big-black hole in the center, the Universe a smaller, ultra-dense nucleon and the hyper-Universe, a microcosmic Planck’s spin, whose inner space-time dimensions exploded and expanded in those big-bangs.