THE ORGANIC NATURE OF PARTICLES AND QUANTUM THEORY.THE ELECTRON

An electron is a herd of photons that gathers into a particle or expands as a wave depending on which strategy maximizes its survival and movement, as a school of fishes does in front of a predator. The herd even splits its S-T fields (P1, P2) when it finds an obstacle and latter merges back those space and time fields into a compact form. Yet Physics ignores biological strategies and uses a statistical, incomplete explanation to maintain its ‘mechanic’ ideology, so it multiplies back those fields as ‘probabilities’ .

 

Physicists try to unify mathematically all forces and particles, when it is more important to understand them in terms of the structural duality of the Universe, both in their 3 ages of temporal evolution and as spatial, organic, stable structures, with harmonic E/T parameters. Physical particles behave in an organic form; and so we always require an e, te, t, ternary perspective to fully understand their processes, though AE-Physics explain them only in mathematical, spatial terms with the result that many quantic events such as the wave-particle duality remain unresolved. In the graph we show one of those events: an electron explodes into its quanta as it reaches a thin barrier in order to cross it. Light also divides itself into a herd of photonic quanta when it passes a slit. In fact, quantic particles split their spatial and temporal fields, ExT when passing those apertures. Then they sometimes mix them back together successfully recreating the electron and sometimes fail to do that. So we might say that particles ‘die’ and ‘resurrect’ constantly. Hence there are 2 possible solutions to the previous event, which quantic physics express as a quadratic probability when the electron reconstructs itself (ext) or a null probability (e¹t) when it doesn’t; and we explain as a biological process. The biological nature of those events are even more clear in the inverse process, when a spatial force comes closer to an informative, complex particle, evolving/feeding (informative or energetic p.o.v.) into the complex particle. Then light comes together as a hard particle when hitting the bigger electron, as a school of fish clumps together in front of a bigger fish. Physicists say that the wave solutions of a Quantic Spaces-Times field collapse. It is the abstract, statistical way of saying that a wave of light, a herd of h-quanta implodes temporally when it is absorbed by an informative electron and vice versa. The how is the same but the why changes. The explanation of many properties of particles requires the perspective of vitalism: For example, Quantum Numbers describe cycles that mimic the 3±1 cycles of organic beings, the ‘why’ of its existence. In that sense, when we leave aside the complex jargon of XX century quantic physics and interpret those particles within the ternary, organic perspectives of Quantic Spaces-Times theory, the world of forces and particles become much easier to understand and far more harmonic. Yet since a new paradigm has to explain the previous paradigm, in this book we alternate perspectives. Thus after considering a few of the new discoveries of quantic space-time we will try not to translate briefly classic quantic theory to cyclical quantic space/time.

9. Explaining the standard model in Quantic Spaces-Times terms.
Let us then classify the fundamental properties found by quantic theory in Quantic Spaces-Times terms, considering them either spatial, organic (et) or temporal events that happen in the quantum world:

ET: The quantum world is made of waves=herds of populations susceptible to be treated statistically
Einstein already warned about those mathematical abstraction s that hinder our understanding of quantic processes: “I have very little receptive talent to follow the developments of quantic theory because I do not approve their purely statistical way of thinking”. On my opinion there is nothing wrong with the mathematical description, as long as we realize it is only a way to perceive a more complex reality that we have to define both in biological and geometrical terms to understand particles as quantic organisms.
In fact, the very same equations and probabilities used in Quantum Mechanics represent in Biology a world of “populations”; a herd that disaggregates and gathers in organisms. Hence both constantly use the dual e±t factor of reproductive growth and dying collapse in their equations. Anthropomorphism prevents us from thinking something so small as an electron is an organism as we are. Yet the why of the Wave/Particle duality can only be explained bio-logically, as a herd of ET quanta that merges and separates according to the survival needs of the herd.

Max. i: Gauge Theory proves the informative, communicative, perceptive nature of particles.
Gauge Theory, the standard theory of particles, departs from a simple principle which is clearly an organic, perceptive principle: all particles exist checking constantly their charge and distances through the emission of intermediate ‘virtual’ particles, that create a field which somehow is measured by their inner space-time. In other words, particles act as Fractal Organisms that communicate constantly energy and information creating relative, simultaneous presents. Communication is even more evident in other fundamental quantic effect, synchronicity: when 2 equal particles have ‘communicated’, gauged and measured their space-time distance and form, they will act thereafter in synchronicity regardless of their distance; as 2 ballet dancers do. Which implies that they perceive each other through instant=present gravitational forces regardless of their distance and also that they have an inner organic system that has equalled their space-time parameters upon contact. Thus, those particles have created a present, simultaneous social, quantic network. Dancers also behave in this way when they interiorise and learn a choreography and then they check each other’s distances when they perform to adjust their movements to the group. Particles do the same when they travel in groups checking their distances to maintain parallel behaviour without friction.

ET: ‘h’ is the minimal action of the light-world shared by all the species of its ecosystem
Gauge theory is also an organic theory since it considers those particles as temporal points or ‘informative brains’ whose flows of inner temporal energy with the external world cause the spatial fields of forces, or ‘bodies of those particles’ we observe ..17-19). So it summons up all quantic events as ‘fermion/boson inversions’ defined by an Quantic Spaces-Times equation:

T(fermion) <Spatial boson> T(fermion).

Yet, because all those particles are part of the same ‘light world’, all are related by the Heisenberg's ‘inversion law’, that defines any action of the quantic world in terms of energy and time as: f(E) x g(T)=h. That is, the product of the energy and time delivered by a stable particle or used in the creation of a ‘virtual particle’ of communication equals ‘h’, the ‘cellular’ quantum of the light world, the space-time through which those particles communicate. So a particle with minimal temporal information, such as a photon, communicates particles at enormous spatial distances. While a particle of maximum temporal mass, such as the W-weak particle, can’t travel but a fraction of space-distance. What this means is that virtual particles that communicate bigger particles are born from a quantic action of temporal energy, the minimal ‘cell’ of the light world that becomes the ‘minimal phoneme’ of that communication.
So as the life Universe works through the exchange of quantic pieces of ‘water space’ (normally broken into informative H+ and energetic e- quanta) the quantic ‘light-space’ ecosystem works through exchange of spatial forces made of h constants split in energetic and informative parameters. So the h constant means the unity of all forms of temporal energy of the light-world ecosystem, whose particles belong to the same light family, as all living beings are composed of water cells.

E: The particles and forces of the light-world show in space have symmetric, inverse S/T fields
On one hand, spatial forces are related by the inverse Law of spatial range and form .
While Gauge Theory studies temporal, informative particles through a symmetric SU3 mathematical group, which follows the inverse properties of space-time, max. S x min. T=K.
Again the amazing mathematical feat of the Standard model with its ‘8-folded’ symmetric structures in space that classify all particles according to some basic dual (charge) and ternary differentiations (of spin, strangeness, colour), forming hexagonal structures with inner cores of 2 or 3 particles are geometrical designs, explained by the laws of differentiation of Quantic Spaces-Times theory that miss however the ‘whys’ of those particles and processes. Since all the particles of the SU3 group are symmetrical space-time forms. Where each different S/T proportion defines a kind of particle. However, since those S/T proportions are considered ‘abstract particles’ called quarks, instead of ‘energy/information states’ or ‘dimensional networks’, Gauge theory doesn’t explain why certain particles are unstable and others last eternally as they ‘reproduce’ once and again its existential cycles, since their ST parameters are more efficient. Thus though there might be many exotic particles, the SU3 group shows the most efficient ST combinations needed to create the organic Light-world Universe, as there are only 20 amino acids needed in the life world.

T. The wave equations of particles describe those harmonies and inversions of space-time.
The S-T duality of quantum mechanics implies that in space the structural properties of particles can be described as invariances and symmetries based in the Quantic Spaces-Times inverse law: max. E = min. T. While their creation in time can be explained as different ‘decouplings’ of the original space-time field, (±1), in 3 horizons that shape a ‘wave’ with 3 forms. So we find 3 ‘colour’ properties in quarks, 3 ‘horizons of mass’ in electrons , etc. Those decouplings and equations are specific cases of the Quantic Spaces-Times equation, SE<=>ST, and its decouplings , which adopt a matrix-form in space and a wave form when we study them in time.
Let us translate some laws of those quantic, temporal waves to Quantic Spaces-Times theory:
-  According to Bohr when we combine the electron’s charge, mass and h constant we obtain a length dimension equal to the atom. Thus, the quantic space of an atom is homologous to the spatial energy of its electrons, which are a herd of light h-constants, evolved into ‘charges’. Since the space of any ‘scale’ is its quantic energy. So the space of light is its gravitational energy, the space of an electron its photonic energy and the space of an atom its orbital energy.
- Further on Planck’s constant appears as the minimal ‘organic space-time unit’ of the light world. Since Bohr found it can be expressed, according to the ternary principle, in energy units multiplied by time, ext, (organic point of view), in units of momentum multiplied by length (lineal state) or as units of angular momentum (cyclical state),
-The main quantum equation, the Schrödinger wave, is a harmonic function of the type:  ∫g(e)=f(t). Since it writes as: (V (x) – E )Y= h2 / 8p2m Ñ2 Y. Where the first member is an energy function (E) and the second function a differential equation related to a temporal mass (m). Thus, it also describes the harmonic quantities of energy and information that give birth to different electronic states.
- Physicists compare the energy levels of electrons in the Schrödinger’s wave with a drumHead, a Fractal Organism in which a central singularity vibrates (the nucleus or instrument), producing waves (the electronic waves or energy levels) that bounce back in the border/limit of the drum’s membrane. In other words: an atom is a Non-AE organism that has a central singularity, which exercises a force on the quantic waves of the intermediate space and it has an external Non-AE membrane-limit.
- According to the ternary principle, Schrödinger’s equation is the temporal, dynamic expression, which Heisenberg’s Matrix expressed as a fixed, spatial structure. Latter Dirac put both together as the 2 S-T sides of the same reality, and generalized it for different particles, where the time and space proportions changed inversely, as ‘different solutions’ to a set of E/T dimensional equations that follow the laws of quantic space-time.
- There are in fact, 4 levels of complexity in the description of electronic space-time, which are expressions of the fundamental dualities and cycles of an S-T field:
Newtonian physics and his lineal, energetic principles describe its simplest lineal motions.
The 2nd level of complexity uses De Broglie wavelength equations that express the wave-particle, S-T duality of the electron.
The 3rd level of complexity uses Schrödinger’s equation that shows the different e/t parameters and ages of a Non-Euclidean spherical light space around the central atom.
Finally, for complex electronic clouds scientists use the Hartree approximation in which each electron is considered an individual ‘cell’, to which the influence of the ‘whole’, entire orbital potential field is added, showing the social complex structure of the atomic Non AE system.
Dirac found 4 equations or ‘dimensional states for each particle’, which included the relativistic effects when electrons come towards the ‘unreachable Non-AE limits’ of light-space, the C speed they can’t cross. Since they became ‘antiparticle’ solutions, that is, dying particles ). Dirac also studied the ‘social properties’ of electrons, which can create couples of electronic clouds, when their spins are complementary, but cannot fusion into bosonic singularities, since they are already ultra dense informative particles.
- That social limit was generalized in the so-called Pauli exclusion principle, which applies the 3rd Equality postulate of non-EA geometry to particles. Since it allows only 2 identical particles with the same information to occupy the same point of space as bosons, creating a ‘singularity’ with a height dimension. So 2 excited electrons or nucleons cannot occupy the same space and are called fermions. However, at very low temperatures, when their information is highly ordered, electrons become bosons, the so called Cooper couples. On the other hand, the simplest, light-space particles, photons, are identical, given its minimal in-form-ation, and so they act always as bosons, as Bose discovered. Or in terms of Riemann’s geometry, they form a space with null distance, given their identical properties.
- Those spatial bosons enact a series of events of communication between bigger fermions that follow the 2nd postulate of Non-AE geometry: 2 cyclical, informative particles of the light world, the electron and nucleon, which cannot fusion in a point of space, however can communicate flows of temporal energy, through waves of smaller, lineal forces made of identical ‘bosons’, that attract or separate them, acting as the points of a non-EA communicative wave-line.
Finally, Dirac also showed the negative time coordinates of some particles, reversed from future to past, he called antiparticles. They were in terms of the Quantic Spaces-Times equation, T<=>E ‘dying’ particles...