QUARKS AND NEUTRINOS
Informative particles, neutrinos and quarks, related by temporal forces, weak forces and gluons, exist in 3 time ages that E-science considers 3 different species in space. Yet, they are the same particle that changes their “colour” or temporal age, moving from past to future and from future to past. In the graph, neutrinos fluctuate in 3 ages, as they travel from the sun to the Earth: the electronic, muonic and Tau neutrino.

 

11. Quarks as networks that mutate through temporal events.
If we consider the Universal arrow of order, the 3rd horizon of evolution of particles created the informative species of min. space-distance and max. informative mass, the nucleon made with a triad of quarks. Till now we have mainly considered the nucleon as a single form, escaping the complex uncertainties of those quarks, which from the perspective of the entropic arrow were the bosonic element of the big-bang. In Quantic Spaces-Times theory the 3 fundamental quarks that make up all the particles of our present light world are treated as the 3 physiological networks/dimensions of information (up quark), energy (down quark) and its combined form (sideways quark), that can mutate accordingly between them when they change their arrows through E<=>T inversions.
Yet to understand in terms of ‘dimensional networks’ instead of ‘particles’ the standard model based on quarks, we would have to write an entire book and what is more difficult, to ‘change the chip’ of AE-physics which considers always the ‘energy’ arrow and spatial perspective of forces and particles, when many of those forces and particles are ‘temporal arrows’ and ‘events in time’ without spatial form. For example, nucleons come in n-p pairs that are the same particle mutating in time, but can be also considered a pair in an spatial analysis, when we ‘dilate’ the dharma of present through which we observe it. Both facts are truly indistinguishable because ‘space-time is quantic’, so when a neutron becomes a proton it ‘jumps’ between those contiguous phases both in space (appearing at the side of the previous particle) and in time (mutating into its closest complementary n or p form). In general AE-science chooses the spatial description, yet we provide here the informative and sometimes organic description to complete the understanding of the particle.
For example, when physicists write, n + P+ = p+, they see a spatial reaction : a neutron made of 3 quarks, udd, ads a pion, (du) and creates a proton. Yet to fully grasp conceptually that process we have to understand it also as a time event: a neutron inverts the ‘temporal arrow’ of its informative network (d-quark), which becomes first an antiquark (d) and then an energetic quark, u, transforming itself into a proton: N(udd)->N(udd) ->N(udu)=P. Hence the pion (du) becomes in fact an event that transforms a d-quark into an u quark through a reversal of function (d (t) < d(e) > u(e)).
The fundamental characteristic of those ‘mesons’ is to be made of a particle and an antiparticle of ‘different’ species. So those exchanges of ‘mesons’ are in fact cycles that change the state of particles through temporal inversions. They only become spatial forms when a bubble camera destroys a nucleon and takes spatial pictures of its debris.
Since we cannot see those 3 quarks and part of their mass exist as gluons, similar to strings, all seems to point out that those 3 quarks form the 3 network spatial structure of nucleons. Yet, according to space-time duality those 3 quarks can be considered also as 3 different phases of a temporal cycle since they can mutate in time into each other. Specially when, given the Relativity of perception, a very fast moving event in time (and quarks are the fastest, temporal particles of our atomic scale), a cycle or a wave, can be confused with a fixed structure of space, in any i scale.
For example, the nebulae we see as an electronic cloud is both a spatial herd of photonic points and an electron that moves in time so fast that imprints our ‘slow’ camera in all those points in the same picture. This second interpretation of an electron wave as a moving particle is at the core of quantic Physics. So physicists ascribe to each of those points ‘a probability’ of finding the electron there as if the electron would go through all those points.
The same happens with light: are the 3 colors of light 3 phases in the existence of light, a sequence in time, or an organic system seen in present space as white light? Both interpretations are correct. They are the essence of duality: A time or space perception is relative: depends on how ‘long’ we make our ‘quantic present’, our ‘dharma’ of perception of reality, we will see colors stretched in time or white light. Yet precisely the same concept applies to the 3 quarks in a nucleon that are considered to have a property called ‘colour’. So the 3 quarks have, as the white light does, 3 colors: are the 3 colors of quarks 3 phases of the same ‘white quark’? In true form we have to consider, as in the case of white light, the 3 quarks a bosonic state in which the different colors ‘converge’ in a single point of space, increasing the temporal density of that point, where the Nucleon is shaped. So, quarks and nucleons can exist in a bosonic state as they seem to be in the black hole singularity of the big-bang, as ‘white quarks’ or in a distended spatial state, in 3 colors. Recently physicists have found that the 3 types of neutrinos are in fact the 3 temporal phases of the same neutrino that fluctuates back and forwards in time, when it comes from the Sun to the Earth. And inversely in the slower cosmological scale, they have also found that spiral galaxies are just elliptical galaxies in their slow process of feeding . Yet they have not extended the temporal/spatial analysis to other physical structures. For example, in a cell, the 3 RNAs are 3 evolutionary phases that also act as the 3 organic elements of energy, information and reproduction that control and create the structures and products of the cell. While a DNA is a boson made of 2 RNAs in a still, informative state.
So happens to the 3 quarks of a nucleus that sometimes ‘fusion’ into a bosonic white quark, and sometimes act as parted elements of that white quark and sometimes mutate into each other. The easiness by which those different particles mutate into each other and become indistinguishable as bosonic particles seems to prove that they indeed imprint themselves on the lower scale of energy, creating constantly copycats of a ‘metaphysical logic form’ on the Planck’s scale. We humans also change all our molecules every 3 months, which proves that the game is a logic game of intelligent, biological morphologies where matter ‘doesn’t matter’ at all.
In any case the dual space-time analysis cast new perspectives on many mysterious properties of particles. For example, quarks draw their gravitational, mass cycles faster than electrons, as the central element of an atomic vortex. So they are heavier. But inversely in the next place of existence, they seem to be the ‘slow’ electromagnetic element submissive to the electric activity of electrons. So they have 1/3rd or 2/3rds of an electronic charge, because when they interact with electrons, we use our faster ‘electronic time clock’ which could be 3 times faster than the d-quark electromagnetic cycle. So 3 quarks in space create the same cyclical, electromagnetic Quantic Spaces-Times field than a fast electron. It’s like a film, decomposed in several photographs that put together create the movement.

12. The organic cycles of quarks and the 3 temporal ages of particles.
  Thus, according to the principles of space-time duality and the laws of ternary differentiations, we interpret the abstract properties of quarks as reflections of its S-T cycles and dimensions:
- E and T: Quarks inform and energize absorbing smaller particles: gravitational quanta of the size of a Planck’s area, photons and electrons in its denser form as pions. To that aim they occupy the central vortex of the atom, which attracts those flows of gravitational and light space-time. So the duality of the up and down quark shows the same quark in its informative and energetic phase, as it feeds on pions, transforming the neutron into a proton and vice versa.
- Re: Quarks bombed with energy absorb it and create seminal gluons that reproduce new quarks.
- S: Their social evolution follows the ternary principle. So 3 quarks create a nucleon.
- S: The triad of quarks show the organic, social evolution of quarks into a tighter more efficient structure, a nucleon, completing in this manner its 5 organic cycles.
- ±1: The 3 colors of quarks are their 3 energy-information ‘ages’ and their 3 flavours, 3 generations of increasing mass .