CHEMICAL LANGUAGES: PLANTS AND HORMONES.
 
The chemical language of multicellular organisms have a reduced vocabulary of ‘yes’ and ‘no’ symbols called hormoneages that inhibit or foster the natural cycles of existence of living beings.
In the graph, the 5 main plants’ hormones are 5 simple vowels: 3 are cyclical, creative, informative, ‘yes’ hormones that reproduce the plant; and 2 are destructive, energetic ‘no’ hormones, with opened rings and strong lineal carbon chains like ethylene, CH2=CH2, that inhibit growth. If we further divide ‘yes’ hormones according to the ternary principle and the 3rd postulate of affinity, we find that each one of them reproduces the plant’s e-te-t element with similar structure:
- Max. E: The longest ternary form, rich in oxygens, Gibberine, develops the lineal trunk.
- T= E: The structural, cyclical form, Auxin, made of carbon rings, develops the leaves.
- Max. i:  The informative nitrogenated, Zeatine, reproduces the brain roots.
Thus, hormones form a simple, ternary language that follows the rules of Quantic Spaces-Times fields, controlling the living cycles of organisms by acting as messengers of the RNA-DNA brains of their social cells.

0. The interaction of the 3 hierarchical levels of life.
According to the Quantic Spaces-Times laws of creation of presents all organic systems require the co-existence and interaction of their 3 planes of social existence or relative past, present and future hierarchical forms.
So the creation of multi-cellular organisms happens also simultaneously in 3 ‘hierarchical planes’: the i-1, atomic-molecular interval; the i-DNA-cellular scale and the i+1 network-organism interval.
While the flows of temporal energy that travel through those different planes of existence follow the hierarchical law of illogic geometry: “A quantic jump in geometric time or a movement in space extends only to the next discontinuous space-time scale.”
So in any organism, the i-1 hormones (the molecular language that regulates i-cells), the i-genes (the information that transcends from the i-cellular DNA to the i+1 organism as a whole) and the seminal, palingenetic cells that give birth to the new being , program only their higher plane.
Hence cellular genes determine the biologic elements of the organism (the next scale of social evolution), but not the i+2 sociological scale of existence of a human being: chemical, racial genes do not determine history. At best we might consider that nervous networks determine the emotional character and intelligence of historic individuals, who might change the course of societies. Let us study the structure of those 3 levels of hierarchical information that codify the creation of organisms.

1. Hormones: the social language of cells creates its networks.
Thus, according to the quantic law, the fundamental language of regulation of social groups of i-cells are i-1 molecular hormones, which act as phonemes of a language spoken by the RNA-DNA macromolecules, the informative singularity of the cells, which can easily manufacture them.
Of course, languages themselves are ‘Quantic Spaces-Times programs’ that participate of the qualities of energy and information, facilitating the Universal understanding of its codes . Take the case of the key hormone of a human male, testosterone. It is a simple protein with 4 carbon, strong structural rings in a lineal shape that regulates, despite its simplicity, the reproductive development of males, provoking actions of a complexity far superior to its molecular simplicity. How it can be possible? The answer is that the hormonal language is a relatively simple, positive Vs negative, ‘yes Vs no’ language that provokes or inhibits the 1±n3 cycles of existence natural to the will of the cells, proteins and nucleic acids it communicates.
But how hormones provoke so many different reactions in a cell, being so simple? The process of course becomes much more complex in their details as any language with a few phonemes can create very complex memorial, sequential sentences through the repetition of a few basic patterns. So for example some hormones are substances that inhibit the inhibitors of those existential cycles. On the other hand many hormones are transported by proteins, ‘lineal killers’ , which modify them or ‘motivate’ other messengers of the cell or network system that carry further the message. Thus the second translation of the hormonal message into a singular product of a certain cell modifies the message that becomes specific for that cell or organ. This is specially certain among animals that, unlike democratic, ‘spatial’, reproductive plants and fungi with a few basic tissues and a lot of generic orders, are hierarchical, temporal, complex systems with 2 informative languages: submissive, slower chemical hormones and faster, nervous orders. So hormones are created by neuro-secretory cells, part of the higher plane of existence of neuronal networks, which pour them into the blood. And often they are accompanies by nervous messages, which they reinforce. Thus, animal cells might recognize hormones because they know ‘behind’ their orders there is a very complex and powerful system, the nervous or blood system that has to be obeyed or else. Since the blood system sends leukocytes to kill rebel cells and the nervous system sends flows of electronic information to control them. It is the same reason that makes people obey simple codes like those of traffic. We obey because we know that behind those codes there is a complex organic system, the state that will send its police, its ‘social leukocytes’ and punish us. So the question is how a cell knows? Because its DNA has a degree of memorial, instinctive perception; it is not a mechanism.
Despite all those elements of complexity, it is still possible to classify all hormones according to their spatial or informative ‘universal’ morphology as ‘inhibitors or agents’ of the 3 basic cyclical actions of any organic system; since their morphology imitates or it is based in informative nucleotides, structural carbons and lineal, energetic shapes, whose functions are instinctively understood by all living forms as all animals understand black and white colors as relative information or energy, or ‘aaarg’, open vowels and bass sounds as ‘energetic anger’ and ‘u’ closed vowels and highly quantized informative frequencies as informative curiosity. So according to duality, when hormones act as inhibitors, they have an energetic, lineal form; when they act as agents to foster those existential cycles they have a cyclical, informative shape. Finally, according to the 3rd postulate of parallelism their atomic components tend to be parallel to forms of the organ in which they accomplish their function. So when they act in the energetic zones of the cell or the macro-organism they are hyper abundant in oxygen, when they act in the informative brain they tend to be similar to nucleotide acids and when they act in the reproductive zones, they have carbon rings and vice versa. In the graph, those simple rules explain the 3+2 main types of hormones in plants:
-Max. E: Cyclical Auxin, rich in carbons increases the growth of shoots, the energy zone.
-Max.T: Cyclical, nitrogenate Cytokinines are in charge of the growth of roots, the brains of plants.
-E=T: Oxygenated, Gibberellic acid provokes amazing growth in trunks and reproductive flowers.
Ultimately in as much as most hormones and enzymes act as inhibitors they prove that the 3 energetic, informative and reproductive inner individual actions of organisms are the natural arrows of all organic systems, the will of any species, that have to be constantly inhibited by the neuronal-endocrine dual logic system of multicellular control. Since when that control disappears, naturally species try to reproduce. That is why cancers and any other form of cellular reproduction are so natural; because reproduction is the natural will of the quantic Universe.
Finally, the duality of the S-T systems and anti-systems with diffeomorphic, opposite coordinates creates inverse hormones neutralize each other. So ‘energetic hormones’ inhibit ‘informative regions’ of the organism. For example, we can consider that form Vs anti-form duality analyzing the inverse growth effect in the root brains and energetic leaves of the 2 previous hormones, auxins and purines. What we observe is a diffeomorphic, inverse dual S-T process: the auxin that increases the growth of shoots, inhibits the growth of inverse roots. And so auxins and quinines together work as a perfect dual system of growth control in the  brain zone of the plant:
The root is a nitrogen based informative system, which as all brains from neurons to worm holes, requires a lot of time and complex steps to reproduce its form. So quinines, its growth hormone, acts by parallelism, since it has 2 purine rings with nitrogens that positively induce the complex growth of roots made with nitrogens.
On the other hand, auxins have a structure that closely resembles the main nucleotide species, the purines. Yet, auxins ad to the hexagonal-pentagonal structure of purines a simple protein tail to move faster, and instead of nitrogens, auxins have 2 strong carbon rings. So it is basically a false purine with a far stronger body and a mobile tail that substitutes the quinine’s nitrogens and inhibits the root’s growth, because it cannot deliver the proper instructions.
On the other hand, the ever-growing shoots are the plant’s reproductive systems; whose natural will to grow is so strong that any hormone increases its reproductive rate unless it is inhibited.
If we study the energetic cycle of plants, again we observe that dual inverse control system: Abscisic acid (a lineal molecule with a lot of oxygen elements) provokes the fall of leaves, while the lineal gas ethane, CH2=CH2, increases by parallelism with the lineal CO2 molecule their respiration and metabolic rate. Both are very simple, energetic hormones, which resemble the 2 ‘energetic’ inverse products of breathing, oxygen and CO2, ‘reminding’ the plant that it has to accelerate or halt to its ‘death’ its production of those 2 products.

2. Genetics. The language of cells and pluricellular organisms.
In an efficient Universe, genes have multiple hierarchical levels that codify the organism besides the basic ternary code that constructs amino acids. So according to the ternary principle there should be genetic languages with 3, 9, 27, 81 amino acid letters, which codify not only the proteins and cycles of the cell but those of the body. In the same manner ‘introns’, the so-called redundant DNA should have genetic meaning and codify the higher scales of organisms - its functional morphology. Yet scientists believe in naïve realism. Only what they see with their instruments seems real; and so the obvious perceived genetic level is the quantic level of nucleotide triads that codify proteins. But those triads are united in groups of nine bases and so on, creating new, 3ⁿ, memorial planes that act as complex genetic forms of higher scales - a Quantic Spaces-Times concept which today genetists finally accept under the name of epigenetics. The enormous quantity of ‘redundant’ DNA and RNA which grows exponentially with the complexity of a multicellular organism is in fact a clear prove of the quantic equation of existential planes, which in terms of Theory of Information states that the number of informative instructions needed to create a system grows exponentially, according to its number of dimensions or planes of existence: ±Eⁱ. For example, to make a car we need E material parts, defined easily in a bidimensional plane with E quantic units of information, the drawings of each part. But we need around E² instructions to put those pieces together in a 3-dimensional form. Thus Eⁱ determines the total number of informative quanta needed to build a hierarchical structure extended through T planes of existence. To put a trivial example: Popular knowledge expresses that law in sentences like ‘an image is worth one thousand words’. Since to describe with lineal, unidimensional words a 3 dimensional image, we need indeed, E³, 10³=1000 words. Thus E² is the number of redundant genes we find in the DNA-RNA systems of a complex organism, because redundant, intronic DNA codifies the creation of the new level of cellular complexity, i=2, the multicellular organism. Indeed, the old belief that a mere ternary amino acid code that creates proteins regulates the entire multi-cellular organism is just another simplifying conclusion of mechanism. A multicellular organism is regulated by intron DNA and the collective language of hormones that communicate those cells...