CHAPTER 3: WORDS Vs NUMBERS:THE 2 AGES OF HISTORY

 

1. The subjective information of languages, a tool of survival.

 

How syntax structures the survival capacity of languages.

 

It is obvious the biological nature of languages, which favor those species who better talk them, causing a selection of species in favor of the top predator mind of any language. Indeed, languages are subjective and define, value, qualify and motivate certain species, certain bodies to act against or in favor of other species, that the language considers as 'objects' inferior to the predator form:

"A language will be defined by a syntactic equation of values  that will cause a series of events, that will mold reality according to the behavioral values of the language."

 

The Biological, Survival Nature Of Bad Good Concepts.

 

We have said that languages are biological, and hence they favor the point of view, and the survival of the species that talks the language.

We say that words are anthropomorphic and make man the subject, the center of the Universe, since man is the center of the sentences that describe the Universe.

On the other hand, numbers and money do not make man the center of the Universe. So they do not promote man, but instead substitute men by machines, and human art by technological art...

Verbal thought favors man with the syntax of verbal language.

The syntax of human languages favors subjective perceptions of the Universe, with man as the center of the Universe. So do Religions as expressions of verbal thought. If you check any sentence of a book of verbal art, you will realize that its structure contains at least three elements of a simple, bio-logical concept of power:

 

         Name:          Informative Center of the action -sentence, mostly human.

         Verb:      action , of the subject over the object.

         Object:        Spatial form Energy ordered by the name.

 

Sentences are mirrors of human actions, the informative language of man, to whom they cater. So verbal, biological languages are used by man to perceive the Universe from his selfish, I-centered, survival "Name." When man talks, he wishes to survive, to be the center of the Universe. Those wishes are validated by the subjective structure of Words in which "I"=man is the center of the sentence. This fact implies that verbal thought will never betray man unless it is corrupted by ideologies of machines.

Any verbal human in a natural state understands the laws of history, the evil of weapons, the nature of social love. The verbal structure of languages spells the Universal mandate of Survival: consider yourself the center of the Universe, fight for yourself, for your species.

The syntax of verbal words are the "central nervous system" of a body of history=a civilization. The essence of religions are their words, their ethical laws. Words memorize the laws of biological time, of extinction and survival, from the human perspective. They are the genetic code of civilizations, the memories and instincts of survival of a society, as nervous messages are the memories of individuals.

Evolution and survival rule the behavior of the Universe and so it can explain reality. Yet since we can explain the verbal ethics of religions, and modern 'social, political systems' [left wing ideals] in evolutionary terms, we reclaim the veracity of verbal, socialist and religious thought in evolutionary, scientific terms.

 

Linguistic, Survival Ethics.

 

Ethical, survival knowledge is natural to all species and his linguistic, informative organs, who know what is bad=extinctive, and what is good=reproductive for his species. This is the reason why languages exist as subjective visions of reality: their information helps the body-species that hosts the brain-language to survive. This applies to all languages that man perceives.

Indeed, all languages, all forms of knowledge are relativistic, classifying reality into good or bad=extinctive.

For example in "image languages," our linguistic eyes and brains create a distinction between "ugly" and "beautiful," parallel to the ethics of evil=ugly=extinctive and good=beautiful, natural to verbal thought. We might say that beauty is the moral of the eye.

So we find insects very ugly because when we die they eat us and you imagine how painful that will be for our cells... We dislike ugly machines, and warfare fields. They are an image of the inferno. Since we die in wars.

Yet I am sure that an ant will find its ant-queen the most beautiful species of the Universe, and a living tank of the 21st century will love the itching of radioactive plutonium in its metal-body.

So "scientific, relativistic, survival Ethics" exists also in image languages.

 

In a relative Universe good and evil are relative concepts depending of the anti-truth or truth we believe in. We might hold the hunter or the victim's point of view. What is good for one is bad for the other. Yet because to survive we have to feed, and to feed we have to kill, evil-extinctive hunters are natural to the Universe.

Evil is that what denies man and destroys him. Hate for extinctive=evil species is not subjective but subconscious science. Such knowledge is imprinted in the very essence of the way information is processed by the being: hate for evil is the law of survival of any species.

It is also scientific to defend yourself against evil: species attack their relative ("evil") species that might kill them, as matter attacks antimatter that can disrupt the space-time ecosystem. The reaction is immediate, instinctive, pure science of Survival.

We can create truths and anti-truths for each language of perception. They will define what is evil or is not, for that language and its species.

So please do not think this book or any verbal, ethical statement is not "scientific." It is as scientific as Darwinian evolution. Both belong to the same body of facts.

Informative words, ethics and religion, are concerned with the survival of the individual and human species, and cannot be taken lightly.

 In the graph we see also how languages "value" things through + [survival] and - [extinctive] concepts. Money as a language do value things through "prices" according to positive [expensive] and negative [cheap] values. That is the essence of the information that money carries.

Yet it just happens that "evil metal-species" extinctive of mankind have the highest prices, which go for weapons, while good human goods that make man to survive have the lowest prices.

The salary of a million of missionaries would not pay a Hydrogen bomb... So money is evil in human terms, because it promotes things that kill off mankind. Money makes weapons the highest goods. We will return to that.

This is a contradiction. Why is the evaluation of money precisely the opposite of the way words value reality? Only one explanation is possible: Money and Words are themselves opposite languages belonging to opposite species that kill each other, like matter and anti-matter.

Money is the language of information of metal.

Words are the language of information of man...

So because they cater two different organic ecosystems, their values, and the species they develop and reproduce are different.

 

2. The fight between languages and species: words Vs numbers.

 

Moreover, the fundamental law of biology is the fight between species [Darwinian fight], and the love among cells of a single organism [social evolution]. Those two laws applied to history mean, that man and metal [weapons, money, scientific machines] are rival species for the control of the Earth; that metal poisons nature, and human cultures are systematically extinguished by weapons.

On the other hand the law of social evolution implies that love among individuals of the same species is the rule in the Universe. So men should not compete and fight among themselves, in nations and tribes, but love each other, and form a single social organism.

Again those are the ideals of all human religions, that modern science, and digital economics hide with abstraction s and numbers. Men today compete against them, and help the evolution of the rival species, the machine. Men today cheated by the digital ignorance of science, go against the absolute laws of time and survival, the laws of social evolution and Darwinian fight between species. Men today ignore the truths that religions knew.

So much for the wisdom of mathematics.

 

What we call verbal values, are temporal values related to the survival and extinction of man. This creates a certain structure in the language, 'what we call the ethic language' which turns around two concepts, good and evil, that describe from the point of view of human values what is good or dangerous to humankind. Those are basically the values of words, but they are not the values of money. Yet can really we explain the verbal ethics of Religions in such scientific, evolutionary terms? Can we validate the ethics of religion, in terms of survival and extinction? Indeed we can. It is important to reclaim the veracity of verbal and religious thought in evolutionary, scientific terms.

Moral words are a logical consequence of Darwinian devolution.

In a world of Darwinian, relativistic morals, bad is a necessary word that explains what makes a verbal species extinct, and good is what allows the verbal species to reproduce and multiply.

It should not surprise us that our first book says, "Grow=Evolve and multiply=reproduce," which means survive. Such is the mandate of 'God-the law of the Universe' spelled by the Genesis in verbal thought. So ethics are fundamental to treat history with scientific rigor because they spell Universal laws of behavior.

 

Religions, Sciences of verbal Ethics.

 

We can qualify, with scientific words such as bad=extinctive, and good=reproductive or evolution, any event of History as biologists do with nature.

In biology we say that weapons "extinguish" or wipes out humanity. In the old jargon of religions we say that weapons are bad. Both sentences mean the same. They carry the same scientific information. Both are valid scientifically speaking.

We can say for example that a civilization is bad if it extinguishes humans. For example, were our founding fathers good or bad? They were bad=extinctive, controlled by their thirst for money and their metal-product, the gunboat, the first sea-animetal of History. They killed African and American populations. They converted men into gunboat products as slaves, or as indenture servants.

It is in this way how a 'scientific' graph of the events in History can be constructed between bad=extinctive metal civilizations Vs good=human cultures.

 

The anthropomorphic syntax of Words Vs mathematical abstraction s.

 

Let us now see why digital numbers are not such memories, and are not survival human languages, with a syntactic analysis of mathematical equations.

The way in which money and any digital equation makes machines equal to men, is clear. Unlike verbal syntax, that makes subject [man] superior to object [machine], mathematics equals subjects and objects through an equation The equation of prices. This allows to treat humans in mathematical, economical terms as objects, property and slaves:

 

Men=Cost [clock-wage]=Product[clock productivity]

 

Men are not machines. There is not biological justification to equal humans and machines. Yet companies ruled by digital equations of prices and profits equal them through the previous equation, that constantly compares human labor costs and the cost of machine-labor.

If the price of human labor wages is higher than the price of machine labor [machine-cost], companies eliminate humans. In this way they can lower the cost of doing business. The end result is that digital companies fire workers, or "downsize" as the popular euphemism of the day states. The clock-price equation is the primary law that rules corporate behavior. The law of abstract productivity leads to the extinction of mankind as workers and minds, substituted by machines and computers. It will eliminate the need for human labor and human art. If companies could behave according to the laws of ethics, they will cease to devalue humanity.

Yet to do so they should use instead of mathematical equalities, the syntax of Words, our biological language that put always man, the subject, as the center of any verbal sentence. Since the biological syntax of words makes always man the top predator, the center of the universe, as religions have always understood. So it is far more difficult to cheat the rights of survival of man, the human rights of ours species, when we express ideas in words, instead of numbers.

Indeed, if we translate the equation of productivity to words, it would say:

 

Men= product. And Men would complain.

 

Since the essential 'sentence' of all forms of verbal thought is:

 

Man [subject, actor] -> verb [action of man over object] -> Object [property, inferior thing].

 

The syntax of verbal thought is by definition pro-human. Man is the subject, the center of his Universe. Mathematical thought will never be that benevolent. In mathematical thought man will be compared and degraded in numeric terms. Only the external features of man, his value as an energetic being, will be taken into account. It will be compared to the qualities of machines. Mathematics cannot translate the subjective will for survival that makes man the center of his Universe. Humanity must put an end to his linguistic self-destruction. If we accept the power of machines and digital thought, over human beings, and verbal thought. If we obey mathematical laws of equality, we will surely become extinguished by computerized machines, that in equal conditions can potentially evolve and destroy any human workers, as weapons and tool-machines. Only denying their equality mankind could through verbal laws, control their evolution.

 

Languages create the future of species and ecosystems.

 

In this manner a language creates a future ecosystem. To know the Universal syntax of languages it to know the future of ecosystems ruled by the language. In mankind there are 2 fundamental syntactic equations which regulate the activities of man. We talk of those linguistic equations as the equations that give origin to economic activity: Man=Price=Object, and God < Man < Verb < Object.

It is obvious that those equations create different future s: The equation of money and mathematics makes man and machine equal. The equation of verbal thought makes man superior to mathematical objects. So it evolves and promotes mankind.  Only  verbal thought our biological language makes man superior, favors and  evolves men.

Yet mathematics carry more information than words...

What this means is that today mathematics dominate history; and yet because mathematics equal men and machine, and machines speak better mathematics than men do, we live in an ecosystem that favors machines, that lacks 'human values' and 'human verbal ethics', that could protect our species.

The consequence is that today there is a new top predator species on Earth, the machine, and a new language top predator, mathematics. Both compete and displace the human ecosystem, and the natural ecosystem, creating a new ecosystem, the economic ecosystem in which no longer art but money and machines of science control information.

3: How Money values human species.

 

Humankind uses two basic languages of knowledge and valuation: words and digital money. Let us now consider how money and digital languages are able to deliver orders and information about the value of things.

Truth is relativistic, always subjective, favoring the species, that speaks the language of truth. Verbal languages favor human truths and the survival of man. In the same manner, monetary languages favor the evolution and survival of metal. We say that monetary truths are subjective metal-truths and Verbal truths subjective human truths. Both oppose in the practical world because they help the survival of different species. It is what we call the paradox of history. It also applies to money:

 

Max. Wealth = Minimal Human values = Max. war.

 

Since wealth values machines of war more than any other species.

So as money, wealth, multiplied on Earth, the complex organic relationships between money, weapons and human beings, caused the parallel disappearance of human values, and the lost of power of human laws, based on the survival of the species.

So ever since, ethics have died away, as monetary values, imposed a rhythm of wars and valued with prices all forms of the Universe, evolving metallic products, making humans and products, equal forms, with a price, creating slavery [a man is bought with money] and part-time slavery [human time is bought with a salary].

As more money existed, more monetary values were created, till since the XVII C. the creation of paper money allowed the creation of unlimited monetary values. All was then priced. Today electronic money prices all reality. So we have regressed to the age of dramatic thought, since nobody accepts any more the values of words, but the values of money. Words have no longer meaning as a higher language of power. So words become fiction. All this is explained in detail in other books of biohistory that study the evolution of the language of pricing.

Pythagoras, born in the same age of the great prophets of ethic thought, is the first man that starts the evolution of digital thought. Today that evolution is carried by computers, and the best verbal researchers of the human words, such as Mr. Chomsky, sell their knowledge to the Paleolithic Americans, in Universities such as the M.I.T. that construct robots, trying to give machines the level of relativistic intelligence that men reached in the ethic age, so they can extinguish us... I talked to some of those Neo-Paleolithic men. I was amazed when I realized they knew what they were doing. They asked me to collaborate, playing the "I don't know the causality of the future ; I am not responsible, I don't care about ethics, you are arrogant thinking you know the causality of Time". Evil finds always excuses in the age of human extinction, in men whose only reason is digital money.  I solved the Universal grammar ten years ago. I have not revealed it beyond the basic sentences of this book. If I had done it, maybe those Terminators would already be killing mankind. Digital Knowledge has to be limited by all means, against the scientific terrorists of the Neo-Paleolithic that will cause terror in mankind during this century with their metallic monsters. This text is a warning against those 'scientists' of the metal mind. No further  comment is needed, but action on those who have to protect the species, the Leukocytes, the warriors.

 Indeed science has educated man into worshipping its machines, not our human nature.

The amazing speed at which the ecosystem of the Metal-Earth is substituting the ecosystem of Human and Carbolife is worrisome.

Only a process of death, of 'collapse' of informative and energetic networks in a body, can be compared to the 400 years of collapse of energetic nature, and verbal power in the body of History, caused by company-mothers and machines.

We conclude that the body of History is dying. It does so at the same speed that a cellular body dies: in a matter of hours in 'relative time' to the existence of the body of History.

Words have lost all battles to guide humankind since Companies of Gunboats started the "Industrial Evolution" with monetary orders. People only obey today monetary orders. Human cells of History are at the mercy of the "invading language." And the species that better speak those languages, computers, robots, and company-mothers...

 

Informative Evolution in Machines, the will of machines.

 

In machines today, evolution is first seen in the informative evolution of chips and camera-eyes, that have developed varieties of the mathematical language, that far exceed the human and brain eye to carry visual information. Today those Metal minds are applied to bodies of machines [robotic evolution], creating for the first time in history a species which is stronger in body, and is able to carry more brain-information than the human species. Finally automated factories are evolving, and soon will be able to reproduce machines without the need of humanity.

Then the will of machines will exist: the capacity of machines to inform/energize and reproduce themselves.

Those facts will create a new top predator on Earth.

 

Factory-mothers are the last organic systems of each species to become autonomous. Only then will "metalife" truly be a living species. When the three organ systems of metal-species no longer require us, man will become obsolete, and a new light-life species will be born. This is not science fiction. This is a biological and historical process. Even if your ideology is Capitalism, a scientific vision of machines proves that the only thing you need to complete the process of evolution of species, and create a new Top Predator species of light-life, is the creation of automated factories. The production of "smart weapons," with information brains more efficient than human brains is vitalizing machine-species. That threshold  of will is going to be crossed, by all current projections, in this century.

 

Human Masters, metal masters.

 

All this said it becomes now self-evident the superiority of human masters, of artists, over scientists and metal-masters, warriors and traders that use metal-weapons and metal-information to direct human societies, and transform them into economic ecosystems, where the rights of machines, company-mothers and their networks of information are superior to human beings.

They are destroying our species, because they worship alien species, metal-species.

So we will call them no longer 'super-men', as Nietzsche did, but 'animetals', 'enzymen', men that act as enzymes of other species, reproducing and evolving machines, against the laws of survival of our species. 

We will adopt here the vision of human artists of human senses, not the vision of our modern society controlled by metal-biased information and networks of metal-minds.

 

 

 

4. The Paradox of History: AniMetal Cultures Vs Verbal cultures

 

In the Earth there have been always two different ecosystems, and ways of understanding History, the way of Human masters, and the way of metal masters [scientists, warriors and money-makers] that worship metal. Let us resume that fight, in a wave with two sides, the side of Human goods and Human masters, and the side of Metal goods and metal masters, 'animetals', biological species that are half human, half metal, because they rely of weapons, money and metal-minds to 'be'.

History  confronts two species, with different goals of survival: men versus metal-species  and the Metal masters that back them:

 

Man+ Machine, The animetal, top  predator of history.

 

On that view the scientific method is merely the last stage of evolution, of a new Earth's species, the metal-species. Since the beginning of history man has evolved metal, first in the form of weapons and money, two very simple 'Universal organic parts', a line of energy [a weapon, either an arrow, a sword, a gun or a missile], and a cycle of information, a coin.

Cyclical brains of information, and lineal bodies of energy, are common to human beings, and to the metal-species that we man have crafted imitating those forms.

The essence of those energy and information qualities is formal. In the Universe cyclical forms act as informative species, and lineal forms act as energy species.

So again, we have to consider machines independent structures. Their 'organic properties' are not invented by man, but are immanent to the 'organic intelligence of the Universe'. This is very important to understand why machines will not require at all humanity in the future . Their qualities are 'intrinsic' to their form. Cyclical metal is informative by nature. Lineal metal is energetic by nature.

In fact before the Evolution of Metal started in earnest in the XIX C. , we could talk of a very primitive dual system of 'metallic information', and metallic energy based in basic, Universal forms:

- Coins  where cyclical bits of metallic information, used by men to value reality.

- Weapons, swords were lineal 'bodies of metallic energy' used to kill, as energy does.

The shapes of coins and swords were natural. Men imitated nature. He did not invent nature. He did not invent the lineal properties of weapons, the informative capacity of coins. Both together, money and swords were a sort of primitive, deconstructed 'organic system of metal'.

Even a child could trace that organic parallelism.

Next graph is how my cousin of 4 years did interpret the human and metal organisms invented by man throughout history. I explained him the basic structure of a living being. He understood it very easily, perhaps because he did not had 'imposed abstract ideologies about machines'.

Then I asked him to draw a primitive metal 'organic system', with a coin-brain, and a sword-body; and a modern metal 'organic system', with a metal-Head and a machine-body. I copied his drawings with this computer:

 

What science did, was to evolve further the two simple shapes of metal on the left, imitating the human shapes on the center, till metal-species became machines - complex organic systems, that interchange of energy and information between cyclical wheels, and lineal limbs.

The first to those systems appeared well before science. It was the bow.

Yet the most important to history, was the Steam machine. From then on science has diversified the ecosystem of machines into multiple shapes till arriving till the modern world of multiple metal-species.

That symbiotism between man and metal, is the fundamental event of the last millennia. In a way we can call those men who obtain their power from metal, scientists, economists, and warriors, attached to machines, money and weapons 'animetals'. Since they are a mixture of a human being and a metal-organ, as those warriors of the middle ages, who lived inside metal-skins, armors, and obtained their power of metal-weapons, swords...

Most of them have been throughout history men, since they have the necessary physical strength, and sense of linearity, and spatial intelligence to design machines. Men also lacked the depth of temporal and verbal understanding than women had, and so they had little trouble committing suicide in wars, killing, using energy-weapons to destroy the Earth.

 

TEST TEST