7- A different Eve and Adam.

 

The first 'animetal', able to create a spatial machine, used to kill other human beings, was probably a man.

Recently we had indirect proves of this fact, coming from genetics.

We are mapping the genetics of European men. We have found interesting chronologies in those genetics. Most Y-chromosomes comes from a man that lived only 58.000 years ago.

This means, all women come from the Mithocondrial Eve that lived 146.ooo years ago, but all men come from a man that lived only 58.ooo years ago.

So 58.000 years ago a man acquired a new capacity, as a predator, which was not the verbal language, provided by Eve, almost 100.000 years before, but a tool, probably a weapon. Then his sons carried that weapon and culture to all the African continent, extinguishing all other males...

Again data proves this facts. The 'verbal brains' perfectly developed of the descendants of Eve have hardly any instruments, to differentiate them from earlier hominids. They are not 'instrumental species'. They are philosophers. They are like women are. They perceive and they feel. Africa is an open landscape of rich fruits, where there is no need to make many instruments to survive. Life is easy.

 

5. Technological radiations.

 

Technological radiations, the javelin hunter.

 

Suddenly there is around the 50.000 in archeological data an explosion of instruments. Instruments become then the fundamental element that decides evolution and destruction of human beings. We might think that there was a 100.000 years of matriarchal societies ruled by 'philosophical women', with little instrumental forms. An age of peace.

Then men discovered the first weapons, probably javelins, as those found in the oldest cultures, or in the Paleolithic caves of northern Europe.

By the year 44.000, the first instrumental men have conquered Africa. The 'Female Verbalis' leaves now way to the 'Homo Scientificus', which expands technology beyond Africa. The territorial limits of the surviving Neanderthals, better adapted to cold climate are easily trespassed.

The javelin man diversifies his instruments. He colonizes other continents. Around 40.000 BC he arrives to South Asia and Europe. There he will drive into extinction older human species such as the Neanderthal. We call that the Upper Paleolithic.

The strong Hunter, became the king of creation. He spread beyond Africa and conquered the lands of the other tribes.

He started the evolution of 'economics', of tools of war.

Yet his victory was short-lived. Very few of those initial men are left today.

The last data proves that in Europe there are hardly a 6% of people coming from that age. They are Basques, some Scandinavians, strong people that remind us of the cave men. Yet 80% of Europeans come from a new 'radiation', around 20.000 years ago.

Undoubtedly a new weapon carried by smaller men, which however proved itself efficient enough to wipe out the javelin men of the age of caves. Moreover, those people resisted the next more peaceful waves of Neolithic farmers and food collectors.

What kind of weapon could achieve that massive massacre of human beings; and impose itself to originate the Europeans and perhaps the majority of other races?

 

The bow, the first machine, the first animetal.

 

It was very likely the bow, the first machine. A machine is defined as an 'Universal organism', made of a material stronger than carbolife, and able to transform cyclical movement into lineal energy and vice versa.

The most simple machine is the bow. The tension of the arm [lineal energy] become a cyclical tension, which again transforms itself into lineal energy [the arrow]. The bow becomes in this manner a powerful weapon able to kill at distance. It is to the old age, what the gunboat would be to the modern age: a weapon that can kill many people, far away, without need of communication. We can imagine that the process of massive extinction that gunboats and rifles brought to the Australians or Indians, imposing the genes of White men, within a century, was the same process that caused the extinction of all men at the hands of archer tribes.

The strategy of the weapon influenced that extinction: archers do not communicate with the enemy. They rather ambush and kill them at distance. So there is no 'sense of community' with the enemy, no contact. Hordes of archers from an initial tribe, where the bow was discovered [hence possessing the same Y-chromosome], probably expanded, in circles extinguishing as they multiplied the neighbor tribes. They probably inseminated many females, killing systematically only their male-warriors - as the Conquistadors went into extinguishing the Caribbean Indians, and took their women as wives-servants.

They are the first 'animetals'.  Even if those primitive arrows had not yet metal points, they are already machines of war, that provoke the same biological effect of extinction of other human beings, that more sophisticated animetal would provoke.

They also cause the extinction of the previous culture of Hunters, which used long spears and stone axes, to attack huge animals. He who had extinguished the Neanderthal becomes extinct himself.

The 'extinction' of the Cave man is a slow process that will leave their final rituals in painted caves. Perhaps the last survivors of that civilization were the men that painted in South-France, their final swan songs.

The artistic record is impressive. In Spain is crystal clear. In the north strong men [there have been archeological findings of men over 6'3, such as the Morin man], paint in caves, their epic fights with animals. They are waging warfare mainly with the animal kingdom, and other Homos unable to speak. Yet there is no signs of war between human tribes.

The growth of 'evilness' which constantly increases in history of men killing other men, had barely jumped from the philosophical age of talking women, in the age of javelin hunters.

Suddenly to the East, in the Mediterranean coast of Spain appears a new civilization and a new kind of painting. They are paintings outside the caves. In the open landscape.

They show for the first time in History men killing men, feasting on war, groups of archers throwing their bows in herds against other human beings. Cruelty, and war has increased geometrically with the arrival of weapons. Now evil=anti-live, is recalled by artists, who are proud of their warriors. Now the age of animetal starts.

So the same evolutionary and extinctive processes of life beings observed in the pre-Human Earth, takes place again during the Human adventure, among human beings, through the organism of history, guided now by technological evolution.

 

Technological radiations Vs Human good radiations: the Neolithic.

 

The genes of the first Eve, the first Homo Sapiens are still with us. So human races are not the main characters of the extinctive radiations of history. Technology is.

Species are not only a body-brain system, but also its organic space, its property and territories of order, its technology.

So hordes of Homo Sapiens with better technology, with cultures more efficient delivering information and energy, do radiate in History and extinguish previous species.

On the other hand the 'radiations of human goods', of verbal thought, of agriculture, are slower, and they are not criminal in the same degree that radiations of weapons are. This still happens today. This happened in the past.

Again in the eternal beat of the Universe, is the woman who advances societies to the next level of creativity with the arrival of agriculture.

Women carry the agricultural wave. They observe the cycles of plants and find food.

For centuries archeologists thought the Neolithic farmers destroyed all other humans.

I disagreed deeply. Agriculture is a human good, not a weapon. So its radiation had to be essentially peaceful, communicative. As human goods do.

Finally genetics gives me reason.

It turns out that unlike the radiation of archers that imposed itself extinguishing the javelin man, till accounting for more than 80% of present European blood, the radiation of agriculture only leaves a 10% in the genetic pool of Europe. This means it is a peaceful radiation. Matriarchal societies expand peacefully and communicate their knowledge to the archers of the previous radiation that learn how to cultivate food.

This happens soon after the agricultural radiation originating in Levante and Mesopotamia, starts its peaceful expansion.

We call that the Neolithic. Around 10.ooo BC, the radiation of the Neolithic starts. Around 5000 BC it has colonized the best territories, and the cornered culture of the Homo Paleolithic dies away, improved by the acquisition of new, enjoyable goods.

Ceramics appears. Art multiplies. Abstract thought, a higher level of understanding of reality spreads. Verbal thought develops. Burials become sophisticated. It is an age of Women power, of human goods, of matriarchal societies, of abundance, of fat Venus, the paradise age, the age of Genesis.

Historians do not like to talk of evolution Vs devolution in history, of human goods Vs Metal goods, because they are mainly male, obsessed by the 'civilization of weapons' the animetal civilization they have created.

They would prefer men to be different from other biological beings, superior, and women stupid, inferior. They love the haughty remains, tombs and palaces, missiles and tanks of their make ancestors.

They do not like the politically incorrect fact that man drives man into extinction. That men destroy and women create. Yet this is a book about the hard truths of history and the role of men in History. The main hard truth common to all Universal events is the Darwinian phenomena of radiations of top predator species that extinguish other top predators. Such is the role of men. The damnation of genesis.

 

Male warriors.  The age of metal.

 

If the pre-history of the Paleolithic and Neolithic shows that cultural radiations extinguish previous cultures, the Historical ages, with much more remains, are even more conclusive about the radiating process. The archer, is not the last extinctive radiation in History. Once more new weapons are discovered, and males again displace the Neolithic Paradise of fertility cults and social happiness.

It is the age of metals, and the mathematical languages that evolve its species...

An age with periodic radiations of weapons, that as we shall see are the fundamental cause of the periodic extinction of civilizations and their collective mind, their artistic forms.

 

Human Animetals: Species Of Metal And Carbolife

 

Animetals, are symbiotic organisms made of a metal-species plus a human being. The human being acts as the "dominant, living element" of the process. Our three elements that define a living species are present in animetals. For example a railroad is an animetal organism composed of an energy organ, an "iron horse" [body] + an informative organ, a human driver, and a reproductive organism, a Company-mother.

So, as the Indians did, we could call the railroad an iron horse, a living organism. All living organisms create changes in the energy and information levels of their ecosystem, prey on rival species and transform that ecosystem to their image and resemblance. So happens with animetals. Their living activities cause the extinction of other living organisms, the preying on nature, and the transformation of the organic space through which the railroad or other animetal moves.

So "biological radiations" of machines are the essence of an eco[nomic]system, and the fundamental "event" that shapes the political, scientific and economical facts of the modern world. Men like to be animetals and use metal-organs to  ab=use life with them. If men don't change that attitude metal will continue to pray on carbolife.

An animetal is an organism composed of both, human and metal organs of energy or information. Those metal-organisms of energy and information are stronger, faster, bigger, more powerful than human bodies and minds. So when we combine a machine and a human being, we obtain a symbiotic species [as when we combine the soft body of a crab with its shell] stronger than the individual parts. That is the reason we use machines: they give us more informative and energetic power. At the same time, because of their higher quality, machines replace and supersede humans  in tasks of labor and war. We prefer a computer to a worker, a weapon to a soldier. In this manner men are displaced from jobs and killed in fields of war  by more efficient machines.

 

Animetals, Top Predators In History: The Animetal Vs The Human Being

 

What are the individual and social Top Predators of History and Economics? The most advanced energy and information species, at individual and collective levels of the Earth's eco[system]. Throughout history, they were all human beings. Today, they are what we call animetals, symbiotic species that fuse a human and a metal-species. In the future they will be metalife, pure metal species with chips for brains.

Are we  taking the biological comparison too far when we use terms like animetals? We think not. Try to be objective and look at  history, the kings and warriors that have preceded today's modern technology. Now recall the crab with its house of armor. Most kings and warriors were covered by iron-armor, or had an iron-sword at their side. That was his source of power which made them stronger than other humans. They are animetals, adapted to metal, a cross between an animal and metal. What main species of animetals exist? Warriors: an energy enzyman which is attached to a metal-energy weapon. Traders: a cyclical enzyman attached to informative metal [money]. Or scientists: a complex enzyman, attached to a metal-sensorial instrument. If you look at history, you will realize that such enhanced humans, warriors [men+weapon], traders [men+money], and scientists [men+metal sensorial machine], control the energy and information of history. They are also symbiotic species to metal, different from the communal, verbal, religious farmers that preceded them. They no longer protect the carbolife from where they originated. They protect metal and support the evolution of money and machines. You cannot truly call them human. Either weapons or money have become their energy and information. They are enzymen, catalysts of Metal-reproduction, because to hold extra-power, they will evolve their weapons and machines, and control other humans with them.

In the same manner that enzymes in the body evolve carbohydrates, enzymen evolve metal-species. On the other hand, the increasing complexity of machines, which today also have information systems of an electric/electronic nature, allow us to use the term "metalife," which is much more descriptive of the organic functions of those machines that the term machine. The Indians who called railroads "iron horses" because they perceived a "living Universe," were more in tune with a biological analysis of History. 

The question is: over whom do enzymen and animetals prey? The answer is: on living species and human, nature-based cultures whose organic space they absorb. This is clear in History. In our Indian example, the American animetals preyed on the nature-based culture of Indians until their near- extinction.  Carbolife humans and carbolife horses were made extinct by enzymen and railroads. Now, that organic space belongs to American enzymen and their machines of transport. There are few prairies to feed horses, but many oil-pumps to feed machines. We have few sanctuaries for the protection of carbolife [forests, hills, open space preserves], but we have many sanctuaries that are metal-territories [temples of Go[l]d, icon-cities, TV-altars, Car-museums]. Once again, animetals have erased life-based cultures, and substituted "their horses and Gods by iron-horses and Go[l]ds." Life is extinct by metal. Metal preys on humanity.

Since the arrival of Go[l]d and weapons, traders and warriors, are building metal networks of information and energy on the Earth's surface. Today those networks of the living Metal-earth have eliminated the human component transforming the body of Earth, into pure metal networks [from internet to  atomic weapons ruled by computer networks].

6: The fight of ecosystems on Earth:  History Vs Economics.

 

The myth of superman

 

Our analysis of Human Ethics&Aesthetics bring us to a final reflection on the nature of the Human Masters, the great artists of verbal and visual wor[l]ds that have confronted throughout History, the Metal masters,  warriors, traders and scientists that base their power, not in their own senses and biological nature, but in the power of energy-metal [lines of metal or weapons from swords to missiles, cycles of metal, or money, and metal-minds or scientific instruments].

Human Masters who 'think more and see more', are the true masters of mankind. Since mankind is a mental race - his body is not even the strongest of all carbolife species - and the master artist is the most developed human mental race, it is the artist, the 'super-man', not the warrior, or the scientist, that rely on weapons and metal-minds, to power up their bodies and minds. This was the vision of the Greek philosophers, and it is the biological truth. Hence, human masters, masters of the wor[l]d should rule human societies, as Plato wisely understood. They do not rule our societies, because warriors, traders and scientists, impose their power with the help of their metal. Even worse, some of our societies are ruled 'at distance' by the me[n]tal intelligence of money, by the biological laws of economics, that make of each man a mere consumer=tester and worker=reproducer of machines, without freedom. Yet those are political themes, on the 'myths of human freedom', in present money-controlled democracies, that go beyond the scope of this book.

The fact is that both kind of mental masters, artists and prophets of love religions, Vs animetals and prophets of gold and weapons, have opposed and fought to impose their ecosystems and species, as top predator minds and ecosystems on the Earth.

We talk in that sense of a paradox, the paradox of History that structures our societies in two clear groups: those in favor of human, historic ecosystems, and those in favor of metal ecosystems. At one side the prophets and common people, on the other side, the warriors and scientists, the industrialists that use weapons, money and machines to rule society.

 

The 3 linguistic ages of mankind

 

On that view, we can talk of 3 ages of science, of human knowledge, of the human mind.

We say that in the first age of History knowledge was verbal, and based in the obvious truths of the living Universe.

In all those traditions knowledge uses two parameters in its understanding of the Universe, Space and Time, or Energy and information, or Yang and Yin, or Body and spirit. All parallel concepts. Most verbal definitions previous to Galileo's analysis of Time with a clock, seem to be in a general agreement, both in Greek philosophers, and Eastern thinkers, which evolved verbal science far more than western, western scientists:

The Universe was  made of cyclical minds of information, and organic spaces, where those minds in words of Aristotle, became Gods-centers of all energies.

The Greeks and Eastern thinkers believed in a Universe made of body-minds of all kind of types.

The second age of history of knowledge is brought by the scientific method, by companies reproducers of metal-machines and by mathematics.

Verbal thought declines as organ of informative truths, displaced by mathematics. The way man observes the Universe changes also, due to the abstract nature of mathematical truths.

Euclid, Descartes, Galilee and Newton, invented something that does not exist in reality: the Continuous lineal graph of mathematics related to speed variables and the principle of lineal inertia, so useful in weapon's research. When Einstein believed that such graphic was reality, the continuous time-space becomes a dogma of modern physics, that limits the advance of Relativistic science.

So the scientific Universe remains abstract and dead.

This however was false. As the scientific method discovered more flows of communication in the Universe, it came the third age of History of knowledge, or relativistic age, that shows a Universe of infinite, relative frames of reference, and organic beings.

We talk of the age of relativistic science,  where no longer a given language of perception [images, mathematics or words] carry the total truth but merely represent a mind which observes reality from a certain perspective.

So the real truth of the Universe, is that languages and the species that speak those languages fight for survival. The laws of survival of languages and their species are far more relevant truths that the way in which each language describes the Universe.

 

We talk of social religions of love, as the highest verbal mode of analogic thought. While Relativity theory and Non-Euclidean geometry represent the peak of analogic thought in mathematics that never has been applied to science itself, and the scientific method as a relative form of truth, that favors machines and mathematics more than men and verbal, languages.

Unfortunately this state of Relativity of knowledge has only been hinted at in verbal societies; while mathematics has developed it far more. Hence the present differential of complexity between human verbal ideologies of dramatic or A-logic character, and mathematical products [weapons, networks, scientific knowledge, chips] evolved into Complex logic systems of human control [stocks-nations, informatic networks, networks of digital images, simultaneously programming masses of human believers.]

 

Human, Verbal  Wor[l]ds Vs digital languages, animetals and machines.

 

Most civilizations have been ruled by animetals, specially warriors. Why? Because machines and species of metal, give them power. And among them the most powerful ones, the most perfect machines are weapons.

Weapons are also the species of metal that prey in a greater manner over human beings.

Weapons "extinguish" life, and "energize" the evolution and reproduction of machines which increases in war. On the other hand, men are killed by war. We can express this in a formula, the Paradox of History:

 

Max. war=Max. metal evolution=Max. Human devolution=Min Human Goods

 

In biological terms we say that species of metal energy preys on human energy, the bodies of cellular men. Does money also prey on verbal information? Does money corrupt ideologies of verbal thought? It is obvious that money and the species it helps to reproduce [weapons, metal-communicators such as TVs] prey on and substitute verbal ethics, and religions of love... Ethics and Economics have always been opposed.

In History metal-species created by man, prey on Human verbal networks and cultures.

Technological nations are by essence, in scientific=evolutionary terms evil=extinctive civilizations. For example Nazis  "extinguished" millions of humans, despite the fact that "technology" never evolved more during history than in Germany during the ages of Prussian militarism and its later decadent version - Nazism. Germany split the atom for the first time and bred the people who invented the A-bomb. They developed modern chemistry, modern physics, most of the present machines, the first digital computer.

They were the embodiment of the scientific method. Metal-Historians who think metal only means progress for man, have always been puzzled by such contradictions. Was Germany a great  or a bad nation?

Biological history explains it without contradiction, through an evolutionary analysis of history. Since in biological thought, modern science made with clocks and telescopes is not only a form of knowledge but  also a method of creation of 'sensorial machines' and weapons which kill humans. So science is bad-extinctive, and the reproduction of scientific weapons is bad-extinctive. Nazis were nazis precisely because they were the most technologically evolved nation, where verbal truths of History were more corrupted, and social evolution totally ignored.  A warning for nations who put technology and science over human rights and ethics.

Do not confuse knowledge with the scientific method that makes clocks and telescopes -machines- the valuators of truths. Knowledge and truth might be gathered in words, even if science considers them inferior to digital thought.

7. The 2 ages of history.

 

All this said, it is evident that we can divide the history of mankind, in 2 ages, that correspond to the dominance of the two basic languages of man:

- After the birth of languages in the pre-historic age of man during the Paleolithic, in which the first men appeared as verbal species, verbal thought the main language of mankind, learnt how to preserve itself through time, either in memorial conservation - from poet to poet, from believer to believer, as it happened in India till very recently - or in texts written on artistic media.

We consider that it starts then the mature age of man or...

 

- The mature age of Verbal languages. It is the first historic age. The age of verbal science and verbal religion that explained with words the nature of the Universe, and the way man had to use verbal information to create social organisms, in which words and laws, and ethic religions acted as nervous impulses that controlled and organized masses of human cells.

 

- And the age of mathematical languages. Which developed science, mathematical design of machines, and monetary societies. It is also the third age of verbal languages as those verbal languages no longer control human societies, and become fiction. Laws become corrupted. Religions become ritualistic and forget the prophetic words, making of money the center of their power. And literature no longer is realist and describes human existence, or is philosophical and tries to explain the Universe, but becomes fiction, dream-like accounts of the individual life of a few people.

 

 In the beginning of history verbal languages dominated over mathematical language. So we talk in History of two ages of knowledge. The age of words, and the age of mathematics. Both carried subjective truthness, and information, hence both were valid. The difference is that the verbal age was the human age, since men are top predator species of verbal thought. While the mathematical age is the age of machines, because machines are designed with mathematics, perceive the universe with mathematical concepts, and think in computer machines much better with mathematics that we men do.

So we also parallel the age of mathematics with the age of the extinction and degradation of rival verbal languages, rival human verbal brains, and ultimately rival human species, that compete with mathematical machines, as workers, soldiers, thinkers, and recently (witness the scandal of the American Presidential Voting), electors of the governments of this planet. In that sense we have to be aware that knowledge is also a bio-logical concept. The evolution of knowledge is the evolution of the language of the mind, not 'an objective thing' unrelated to those languages.

 

 

 

 

The evolution of knowledge is evolution of the languages of the mind

 

Knowledge obviously is the accumulation of information about reality with the human mind.

What is then the human mind?

Here is when an objective analysis brings a rather simple, yet enlightening answer: Your mind is an organic system that processes languages of perception. Those languages of perception are basically two: sight and sounds, from where the two languages of human knowledge derive, numbers and words.

What do numbers and words, eyes and sounds perceive?

Eyes and numbers perceive space.

Verbal words and sounds perceive time. Words are verbal constructions that talk about events in time. Mathematics are geometrical games that explain events in space.

So we come to the conclusion that the human mind is a 'being that exists in space and time' and so it perceives space and time.

You are a mind that perceives time and space. That is the nature of your existence. You perceive time with words, with verbs. You perceive space with eyes, with images. That is your connection to reality. The evolution of the human mind, of our words of comprehension of time, and our perception of images [either thorough art, or mathematics], is the very essence of knowledge.

So to know, is to develop the two languages of the human mind, words and images, [simplified by mathematics], and the comprehension they bring us of the events of time, and the forms of space...

Once this is clear it is easy to understand knowledge and science as a process of evolution of human languages, and the information we collect with those languages.

 

The 2 Ages of Science. The 2 ages of knowledge.

 

History does not evolve human bodies, but human languages. This is evident. Our species exists as such since perhaps 150.000 years, since the arrival of verbal languages, without real changes of morphology. It is then verbal and mathematical knowledge, the virtual worlds and the mind of man what evolves in history.

Thus, we talk of 2 ages of human knowledge, according to the evolution and predominance of the different languages of the human mind.

- The verbal age of knowledge, represented by Taoism, Buddhism, philosophy and religion. It is the age of perception of time, with words an verbs, with '3 dimensions', past, present and future .

- The mathematical age of  the scientific method, started in ±1602.

Humans changed the perception of space and time, no longer observed with words, but with clocks, and numbers.

Yet in both ages man has tried to answer the natural questions perceived by the mind and its languages: what is time and space, what are the nature of the changes, creations and extinctions that take place in that Universe?

8. The age of words and verbal science.

 

In the age of words, man tries to explain the changes that take place in space and time, using names [which design beings that exist in space] and verbs [which design actions that take place in time between beings of space, using past, present, and future verbs]. The result is the existence of a certain 'Universal grammar', or 'verbal syntax' common to most verbal expressions: Name [spatial subject] verb (temporal action ) Name [spatial object].

That verbal syntax basically says that all events in the Universe relate two species or forms of space, through processes of communication that takes place in time.

It also says that man [the subject] is the center of all those sentences, the actor of the verb, and hence it is the center of the Universe.

Verbal syntax is anthropomorphic. The minute you say a sentence you will probably say "I did that', and you will become the center of the Universe.

Still we know this is false. We know we are not the center of the Universe. So we talk of the first age of verbal science, as an age of anthropomorphic knowledge, in which man is the subject of all things, and the word is the only language of truth. Today this concept of reality still lingers in western verbal religions. However as time went by, such simple idea of the Universe, derived of the 'biological syntax' of words, evolved into concepts more akin to the experimental reality of the Universe.

This happened among the 'verbal scientists' of the Eastern World.

We might call it the 'objective, or relativistic school of thought', as opposed to the 'subjective or absolutist school of western thought'.

The culmination of such verbal school of science took place in a brief period between the VI and IV centuries before Christ [Christ himself can be considered the fundamental philosopher of the subjective vision of the Universe, with men-God as the center of all things]. It gave us the work of a series of verbal genius in Greece and Asia - Lao-Tse, Buddha, Aristotle, Plato - which developed a verbal cosmology, coherent with the perceived nature of Change in the Universe of space-time beings.

They answered our 'fundamental question: the causes and nature of the creation, evolution and destruction of space-time beings".

 

To understand their answer we might have to clarify some 'words', which are synonymous, since those philosophers in general used instead of the modern, scientific concepts of space and time, two different concepts that talked of the same, the concepts of a Universe of space, and a God that ruled the changes, the times of beings...

 

What is God and what is the Universe.

 

God, and the Universe are the two great mysteries, the two great macrocosms about which man has always inquired.

It is possible to know God and the Universe, as the great thinkers of the verbal age, from Aristotle to Buddha thought? I believe it is possible. However before trying to answer that question properly we have to define what most people mean with those words. Since there are several definitions of God and the Universe, we better agree on what is the field of our inquire according to the opinion of most people...

By 'The Universe' most men understand the reality we perceive through our eyes, the spatial reality.  The Universe is "All what exists".

By 'God' most men understand the 'intelligence' of that Universe. Which manifests itself, through the changes that take place in the Universe.

God is for Greek philosophers the Logos of the Universe, the laws that cause the constant change of reality. It is the Tao of Change in Chinese words. God is the Creator, and Cause of the lives and deaths [the changes] of the Universe in Western Religions.

The concept of God turns out to be similar. It is always the same idea of an intelligence that causes Changes. The Eastern man, and the scientist, think the creator is inside reality. Western religions think the creator is outside reality. But for both cultures God is the cause, the logic of change.

The expression "Laws of Change" is a synonymous of the "thoughts of God".

Those Thoughts of God are the subject of our inquire...

Indeed, since all those concepts of God are synonymous of change we have found the right question to inquire the nature of God: 'change'. What causes change? What are the laws of change? Can we control those laws; can we influence God? Those are the questions of this book.

 

Change happens in Time, the Universe happens in Space.

 

Can we relate the philosophical idea of change-God to a 'real' concept within the reach of human understanding? We can.

Since Change takes place in Time, we could say that God is the master of time.

The Laws of Change are the laws of Time.

If the Universe is a physical, spatial reality, God and His Laws are a temporal, logical form.

We could say that the Universe is about Space; and God is  about Time.

Because reality exists in Space; and change exists in Time.

 

Thus we have created a bridge between the abstract concepts of God and the Universe, and the scientific concepts of Time=Change and Space=Reality.

 

It is basically the same bridge, earlier Taoists and Buddhists created many centuries ago.

They said that God is Time, is change. That the logic of God, was the cause of change in the species of reality, in the spatial beings of the Universe.

 

Those laws of change were explained in simple terms by Taoists and Buddhists using two terms, yin and yang, that are quite equivalent to the modern terms of information and energy. The species of the Universe shared and transformed energy and information. The way they shared and transformed that energy and information followed certain rules, which were the rules of change, the logic of God.

As we go along the pages of this book we will see that essentially such ideas are right. The Universe is a game of communication of two substances that we will call spatial energy and  temporal information. The sum of all those spatial energies and temporal informations are the Total Universe.

However we only perceive of that total Universe a part of the absolute spatial energy and temporal information the total Universe stores...

Where is the rest of that spatial energy and temporal information?

The answer is: 'beyond our perception, in parallel Universes perceived with other forces such as gravitation'.

This conclusion reached by modern science in the last years, through the language of mathematics, is the best explanation we have found to Reality. Curiously enough was also the explanation reached with verbal languages, by the scientists of the age of words...

Indeed, Eastern philosophers considered that knowledge was relative to perception, and human perception was limited by our understanding of spatial energy [yang], and temporal information [yin], with two basic languages, sight and words...

Therefore we cannot know the Total Universe in itself, but we can only perceive through the interposed 'screen' of languages, an image, or representation of the Universe. In the same manner that a mirror is not the being in itself, but only a part of the information the being stores, the senses and languages of man do not perceive the absolute truth, but only a part of it.

Man perceives with his eyes space, and with his verbs time, but - affirmed Taoist and Buddhist philosophers - there exist many other intelligent beings in the Universe, that perceive reality with other languages [smells, other colors, magnetic forces, gravitational forces, chemical impulses, etc.].

The Chinese even invented an entire branch of medicine that worked, based in the concept that your body has an underlying structure perhaps of magnetic nature, like a scheme of your body, that we cannot perceive, but we can influence with metal-needles...

 

In search of an indirect method of truthness.

 

Today, the last advances of morphological sciences give reason to the Chinese. There are multiple processes of growth which are not 'random' but followed certain mathematical structures common to magnetic and gravitational fields, called 'spirals', and 'cardioids'.

So you grow according to a  common gravitational and magnetic deformation of space-time called a spiral and a cardioid. When we apply to a child's Head a mathematical tool called a 'cardioid transformation', your Head grows to acquire the form of an adult.

Is it that growth ruled by the necessary growth of the magnetic-gravitational blue-print, which underlies your bone-structure?

Since we do not perceive gravitation, only indirect proves can answer that question.

This might trouble 'classic scientists' that as 'anthropomorphic religions' do not want to limit the fantasy that man can perceive it all and know it all with absolute certainty.

Yet it is necessary to accept that we exist in a virtual world, creation of the mind which is not necessarily the total Universe, or even the world that other sensorial species perceive.

The Universe is a 'linguistic representation' of words and images, as the Universe a computer perceives is a linguistic representation of numbers and the Universe of a dog, a representation of smells, and images...

A tree has a chemical map of the Universe, a star has perhaps a gravitational mind, [for Eastern people celestial bodies were living beings, hence their development of astrology] a man a visual and verbal mind...

So the big question is: how can we study the logic of change, that guides the action s and changes of all those beings?

Again Eastern philosophers came with what it seems the right answer:

Since we know the 'logic of change', the effects of Time in Space, for a lot of species, and all those species, when analyzed in depth, follow certain basic ruled laid down by those philosophers, it is logic to affirm that all other species not-perceived by our senses will follow the same rules.

This is in essence the way science works. You boil water with heat one thousand times, and it is the same process, so you 'extrapolate' a law: 'heat boils water'.

Eastern philosophers said: 'the changes of space, the changes of all beings we perceive, follow the rules of 'yang-spatial energy', and 'yin-temporal information'. So those laws should also rule the species, and dimensions of space-time we do not perceive. Thus, those rules are the laws of God, the Total Change, the Laws of the Universe, the Total Space.

 

They had found what we might call the 'homologic', or 'analogic', or 'biologic' method of knowledge. Since those rules were based in homologies, analogies, and further on, as described by Eastern scientists, were rules common to living and non-living species...

 

The homologic, biologic method.

 

Eastern philosophers  accepted a biologic Universe, a living Universe, where beings with different minds see 'parallel Universes', virtual mas of reality, logic models, mirrors of reality, which helped them to act and survive in the Universe.

When this became evident to the Hindi and Chinese philosophers, the great masters of those two cultures, Lao-Tse, and Buddha, established certain bio-logic rules of behavior in that Living Universe.

In modern terms, we could say that Chinese discovered the laws of transformation of energy into information, and vice versa. For example they affirmed:

'Energy [spatial yang] never dies, but constantly transforms itself into temporal information [yin]"

"The transformation of energy into information follows 3 morphological 'horizons' or 'ages', which takes place in all species of space-time".

"All Universal systems need a minimal quantity of both components, to exist, a 'body of energy', and a 'mind of information'."

And so on...

Those laws that merged biological and physical concepts about time, space, energy, information, life, and death, existence and extinction...

They were simple, based in a few observations [the Asians had not complex instruments of science]. Yet perhaps because of their simplicity, they were truly generic; they could apply to all Universal beings, and so they could be rightly considered as fundamental laws of God and the Universe, of the way Time changes the spatial reality.

They have inspired my research. As I went along discovering those laws, out of my knowledge of science and my analysis of multiple space-times, I found them also in Eastern religions. Which confirmed me I was in the right path, since people from another age, and culture had found the same concepts, observing the Universe and God...

 

Regarding the laws of behavior in that Universe, the Asians also laid down simple, effective laws to enhance the survival of humankind.

Buddha insisted that men should kill only those species it required to feed on, since all beings had a soul-mind, all species had a virtual image of the Universe, and therefore were living beings. It was the biological law of action -reaction : if you gave a bad 'karma' [bad energy or information] to another being, the other being to balance the total Universe, would send you the same bad karma [bad energy and information] that could destroy you.

 If we respected the life of those beings, those beings would respect us. Such Universal law of behavior was the key to survive in the Universe... Lao-Tse also came to the conclusion that men should be careful with the way it interfered in the natural processes of life and death, since the forces at work 'the logic laws of change', the laws of God, were too powerful and we men should merely strive to understand them, and rule our lives according to them.

 

So we have to conclude that the verbal age of science, reached coherent and efficient answers to the great questions of mankind. It explained the Universe as a game of spatial and temporal parameters. It understood the existence of many 'dimensions' in that Universe beyond our world of light. It developed an ethic vision of our role in the Universe according to his nature. When applied correctly it created human societies harmonic with nature, and those Universal laws of change. The aim of those societies was to survive, to repeat its 'cycles of existence', and control to the benefit of man the process of change. The Chinese were specially successful at that; and we can justly said they managed to keep their society unchanged, healthy and growing longer than any other human society ever.

 

I consider that through those Eastern philosophies, in the golden age of the scientific word, which has its summit in earlier Taoist and Buddhist thought, men evolved mentally, and matured on its verbal perception of the Universe, from a simple age of language, of subjective, syntactic, anthropomorphic, dogmatic, nature, to an age of complex language, of objective, semantic, universal, relativistic nature.

Even the verbal and visual-mathematical language was put in perspective as a mere instrument of human subjective knowledge, unable to give us the absolute truth-information of the Universe. If absolute truth was impossible, what was then the purpose of knowledge? Obviously not a theoretical, dogmatic purpose, but a rather pragmatic reason:

To help the probabilities of human survival, by guiding our acts in accordance with the Laws of Change; and specially by building a general sense of respect, and precaution about all the phenomena we did not understand.

 

However that intelligent evolution of the word did not take place in the western world. Except in the work of a few Greek philosophers, verbal knowledge about the Universe, withered away in Europe, defeated by earlier anthropomorphic theories of man as the center of the Universe. Those 'dogmatic ideas' became nationalistic, racist, and religious ideologies, that affirmed the supremacy of man-God over the Universe. They were not promoted by the power of reason, but by the force of violence. They still exist for a simple reason: you can kill those who hold the truth, and then nobody opposes your truth. The expansion of Western civilization and those ideologies by violent methods do not imply however the evolution of its verbal ideas about the Universe, but of its weapons of mass-destruction...

More over the different degree of evolution of the word in western and eastern societies had grave consequences in the second age of knowledge, the age of mathematical science, since mathematics as the new language of truth and perception, evolved in Europe where the word was in a primitive state of knowledge, not in Asia, where words had developed in full, and could have eased the path of mathematics towards 'relativistic knowledge'.

 

9. The age of mathematics.

 

The age of metal and mathematics.

 

All this said is obvious that man can understand and understood the universe also in verbal terms, not only in mathematical terms, in that sense we can also talk of 'ages of knowledge' that jump from language to language, and make man not necessarily more intelligent, since each language has to evolve again through its 3 ages as a mirror of the Universe. Today mathematics is the dominant language, but as we saw with money, it does not necessarily improves the human understanding of the universe...

Knowledge is the key to understand history. Linguistic knowledge, the virtual worlds and the memory of man is what evolves in History.

We can relate the great ages of History, with the evolution of its informative organs, from verbal thought [age of prophets] to mathematical thought [age of pricing] and finally to digital thought [age of images]. This is specially truth when we talk of the age of written records, or classic concept of History, in which human knowledge and the products men construct with that knowledge establish the rhythms of History.

We talk of 3 ages of human knowledge.

- The verbal age of Taoism, Buddhism and religions of the living Universe.

- The mathematical age of pricing and the scientific method, started in ±1602

- The digital age of metal minds, researched by the scientific method, which moves knowledge outside the realm of human existence. Which starts in the XX century.

The essence of the two digital ages, is the adaptation of human truths to digital truths. Each language perceives the Universe in a way or other. It does not mean a certain perception is better. Science makes of numbers and metal senses a method of truth higher than verbal thought. So it adapts the verbal, visual truths of man, to the perception of metal-senses, and the errors that digital languages introduce in their adaptation of reality.

When you see with a human eye you transform truths into images and verbal languages. You introduce errors - such as the error of seeing a film in continuity, when it is discontinuous, broken by black patterns.

Digital languages also have errors of "continuity". The main of such errors is to use numbers to describe human beings. Since numbers simplify into abstraction s living beings, and so they no longer concern with survival...

It is the use of numbers to describe mankind, the main consequence of the change of languages in the Earth, a change in the very syntax and subconscious manner we value human beings.

 

The second age of science is therefore the age of mathematics, which starts in Greece with Euclid and his 5 geometric postulates. Since we are in the western world, where the word is anthropomorphic, and considered an absolute truth, when mathematics substitutes words as the language of knowledge, the same absolutist, dogmatic concept of truth is applied to the new language. Now Euclidean mathematics becomes the supreme language of truth.

Euclidean science considers the Universe a mathematical object, described perfectly by geometry. Newton said the Universe is a clock because he uses a clock to measure space-time. Galilee and Descartes affirmed that all the space of the Universe can be represented in a graph [the Cartesian graph], based in their light-eye perception. Space is what the eye sees and mathematics describes in that plane... There is nothing beyond that space...

Kepler goes further and considers that only man and God are intelligent because both understand mathematics: "God has waited 5000 years [since the biblical creation] to find a mind parallel to his [the mind of Kepler]". Such arrogance of the western scientist is similar to the arrogance of the western believer in anthropomorphic religions.

Mathematical science creates also a dogma, now mathematical, that considers mathematical definition of space and time as absolute truths. It is called the 'scientific method'. Only what we experience with human eyes or human instruments is space. Only what we measure with clocks is time.

 

The Errors Of digital languages

 

Mathematics are not the absolute "truth" of the reality it describes, but a language of perception as smell, words or sight might be, in the sense that it merely acts as a mirror of certain Universal information. It does not carry all the information of the Universe. What does mathematics ignore?

We can answer the question backwards. What is the origin of mathematical, geometrical information? Mathematics is mainly a spatial, visual language, derived of the geometry of the Human eye, and the three dimensions of light, [width-magnetic field, height-electric field, and length-speed]. So geometry [mathematics] becomes the spatial scanner of man. The enormous speed of light gives light minimal temporal information about our environment [the Earth's crust], and maximum spatial information. We observe the spatial instantaneous world with light and geometry, not the temporal changes on this world. Mathematics lacks temporal dimension. Mathematics measures time processes, only in an abstract manner. For this reason mathematics do not explain properly events concerned with change in time, like "morals," or survival. Man improves such defect of eye-mathematics with verbal thought, the time scanner of man, concerned unlike mathematics with temporal events, such as death, life, survival and extinction.

Moral words and "Theory of Evolution" are temporal languages. All species require to understand time to survive. When men changed his sense of truth from words to mathematics and images, he lost that sense of time, of survival. Today our children play with guns, because in images - not in words - murder is beautiful. Scientists construct robots, because in mathematics - not in words - robots are beautiful. In all that is concerned with survival and existence -a temporal function- verbal thought is much more intelligent than mathematics. For that reason in a healthy organism of history, verbal thought should control mathematical truths. Since the survival and existence of man, is more important than our knowledge of spatial images and abstract numbers.

 

The Lethal Properties of Digital Economics

 

This is precisely what abstract economics does, since it promotes the mathematical abstraction of price, where man is equalized to machines in fields of labor and consumption, thanks to the abstract concept of a price-number, or monetary measures that value both, inanimate objects and human lives: man=price [number]=product. Scientists and economists forget that survival is temporal and has to be argued in verbal terms. Mathematics is spatial and should be used only for spatial matters. We should not make decisions about the survival and extinction of human species in mathematical terms.

 Since mathematics do not have the capacity to describe temporal values, when science makes abstract decisions, it forgets the temporal survival consequences of those decisions. Words however have 'meanings', values introduced in the word, which have a subjective human origin, based on the human survival function. If we say, we are going to replace 100 "families" with 10 "computers," we have information from the perspective of human "families." In the verbal case there is a natural resistance to accept the event as just, since it eliminates the job of 100 human families.  If we say 100 > 10, we eliminate labor of higher cost. In mathematics, men become abstract numbers and we ignore their human value. Mathematics of pricing attempts in this manner against human rights. Mathematics describe the event in abstract, non human terms. Verbal thought in organic, human terms. Scientists tend to deny the limits of truth of mathematics. Yet since reality is guided by languages, the enormous arrogance of mathematical scientists that apply digital equalities to all species including man, spreads the  lethal properties of mathematics to all fields of human existence. 

Why mathematics seem abstract to us?

The answer is that Cartesian mathematics are based on abstract postulates created by Euclid which reduce all species to mere points. Euclidean postulates simplify the organic Universe, into a game of mathematical points, by eliminating the internal, organic parts of points.

100 [humans] eliminate the content, texture, form, and properties of the human. Now they are 100 points in a Cartesian graph that can be equaled to any other 100 points, such as 100 dollars.

Galilean sciences, based on abstract, Euclidean mathematics, describe also communicative events without taking into account the internal parts and organs of the individual species-points with mathematical equations. As such Euclidean sciences have never properly described reality. They here simplified reality into non-organic, games of numbers [points without parts].

Unfortunately Euclidean sciences are used in industrial processes, and their perception of a dead universe justifies multiple forms of preying of man and machines over life, of companies over people. Since Euclidean sciences do not accept the internal organs and perception of species, [the virtual linguistic worlds of "points"], they diminish human perception of the organic Universe. What we need with such an abstract science is a thorough criticism of its limitations. Since it is a poor tool of temporal and organic perception of the organic Universe.  

 

Further on it is clear that the preying of humans as points by mathematical sciences implies the extinction of survival instincts in man, and the degradation of the living Universe.

 

10. Errors of digital languages: The simplicity of mathematics

 

All this lead us to critic mathematical science as it is today.

 

Since there is nothing good about the abstraction of mathematics, nothing pure, in a language so simple as Euclidean mathematics, except their lack of capacity to truly explain Reality.

Today the arrival of Einsteinian Relativity, the arrival of Dark matter, and the sheer evidence of living species, that perceive other spaces and worlds of communication diminish our respect for mathematical truths.

It is necessary to accept that human knowledge is limited by the nature of our languages of perception, by our eye=Words or human  function of perception, and our mathematical and verbal languages derived of them. We need to understand those limits.

 

Why light-space is not all space there is.

 

What we see when we see a Cartesian, mathematical graph or an image with our eye is light space. Light however does not carry all the information about the space it moves through.

So we make a mathematical map which is smaller than the reality around us.

 

That map has certain holes of information, that makes it a reduced vision of the total Reality. The most obvious holes are those discontinuous species within that mass of light space, called opaque objects. Look around you. What you are seeing is not the entire Reality, but the sea of light, and from time to time, that light finds another discontinuous Reality made of atoms, and you only see the external appearance, and the way that discontinuous Reality interact with the object.

It is what you call an image of Reality.

Yet of all the space between those objects and your eye, you see even less. You see it as a 'transparency', and only obtain from it the concept of 'distance'.

Because of that 'transparency' without information you see a 'continuity', because if you would see that space discontinuous you would need to see far more information of that space, and you don't really need it. To survive you need to see only big things, not the small discontinuities of the gravitational Reality. So you don't see them. as you don't see the black pieces of a movie-film. Yet they are real, they are there..

Your eye-world is a world of light. Yet because light comes to your eye very fast, it shows you a very long continuity without detail, of extended regions of space. Every time you make a map of Reality in your eye and brain, you are putting together miles of reality scanned by light, and so you make a very long continuous plane, abstract of the real space, as long as the 'speed of light' that cover thousand of kilometers every second you make a mental map of reality.

From that eye-plane Descartes brought about his mathematical plane, and defined his abstract points, without pats.

So the light-space you see and the Cartesian graph are synonymous. Yet that light space is not the entire Reality. Each discontinuity within that light space, each object is another little Reality. Even in those spaces between objects that light seems to cover, there are other discontinuities that light does not scan. They are called dark matter, and are also spaces that you do not see. Like you don't see in a movie the black patches between lights. So light only brings you little information on little pieces of the total space, leaving blank spaces.

If you were using instead of light, to make maps of reality, smells [atomic information] o sounds [mechanical waves] you would see another different map of reality, another kind of space.

Your mathematical eye- space is an abstraction of reality, a map, not reality itself.

There are indeed other ways of scanning Reality besides light. There are smells based in atoms and gravitation based in other forces. Each of those other languages that scan Reality, will give other virtual worlds, maps of Reality.

Thus mathematics, and light-space and Cartesian graphs are particular graphs, of reality.

Euclidean postulates are derived of that light space-time, a '¥-linguistic' perception of the human eye.

 

The eye is the a priori sense of Human space, as words are your language of time. Men are thus perceptors of verbal, mathematical, and ¥-based linguistic statements about reality. Yet beyond man, languages made of a certain form of energy [light, sound waves etc.] can shape different perceptions of reality. What we call 'virtual worlds' or 'minds' or eye-worlds. The human specific 'virtual worlds', are thus limited by our range of sensorial languages that perceive space or time: mainly light, words.

As a result of that specific light-nature of our space-time Reality, we tend to ignore many parallel forces that carry also information beyond ¥-light. Even if man cannot decode them, there are forces able to create maps of Reality constructed perhaps with different logic to that of light worlds. There are sentient minds made with those other maps, from ants' chemical virtual worlds, to perhaps gravitational images in masses, that man can not access. To hold as absolute, mathematical maps of reality and equations derived of those maps, based only in light-evidence, is plain arrogance.

Descartes confused the entire Reality with his eye-space.

 

The error of Euclid makes the scientific method a relative truth.

 

Yet the scientific method still proclaims Euclidean mathematics, not a mere simple language of perception of light-space, but the 'reality', the truth of Reality.

It proclaims that such a relative map of reality, is based in absolute truths, called Postulates of Euclidean mathematics, that cannot be argued.

What to say of that? Arrogance is against knowledge.

 

We have to change the definition of a point and make it have width so we can put several parallels on it.

Mathematicians oddly enough have 'en masse' changed the definition of a parallel, to make 'logic' the fifth postulate, instead of doing as I did - the most rational thing: to change the definition of a point and let it have several parallels on its internal parts.

Why? The only explanation is that people imitate people. The first guy that in the XIX century corrected Euclidean mathematics changed the concept of a parallel, and the following guys kept that change....

 

In the real Reality it is proved that through a point many parallel lines [of communication] cross. Yet we do not need to change the concept of parallel.

This means simply that points have breath, have internal organic parts. That points are 'particles', that seen closely become spheres.

This is logic. In such points the 1 and 5 postulate become proper descriptions of a discontinuous Realities of infinite species, each one a relativistic point or singularity with a relativistic perception of Reality. Without such 'points with parts' Reality becomes abstract, a graphic of mathematics.

 

 

Yet the scientific method has not corrected that error of mathematics. So all those scientists and physicists which follow the scientific method, and its E-mathematics, by force only acquire partial truths about space-time reality.

When Descartes considered a representation of the physical Reality, he used a single, continuous space, made from a single frame of reference, in the center of coordinates. That point was the Human eye who creates a 'continuum' abstract space-time, according to the human particular perception of Space [Light space, the only space that the eye perceives] and time [clock-time.] The 'error' of such simple Reality was to believe in the continuity of space-time in such graph. In reality since all points have parts, all points are relative eye-worlds of gravitational, or light nature. There are ∞ points of measure, ∞ different coordinates. Yet the Cartesian coordinates soon became the 'Universal coordinates' of science. So the wrong concept 'space-time continuum' still exists.

The real, complex Reality was the one Mr. Desargues and Leonardo proposed with their projective geometry of infinite, relative points of view. The one Eastern religions have thought of. The total, never completely perceived Reality, in which man is only one of the many focus of communication, of the many virtual worlds=species of Space-time.

Reality is much more complex than abstract mathematics. It has a lot of internal worlds that mathematics do not explain.

Indeed, only relativistic mathematics acknowledge this, in the famous 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean mathematics used by Einstein to describe the real Space-time Reality:

- 5] Through a point [line] external to a line [plane], infinite lines [planes] parallel to the point can be traced in Space=Time.

What means that points have parts. Points have internal organs, and so logically they can be knots of infinite worlds of communication.

Mathematics ignore that. So it is illogic, and distorts our perception of reality much more than verbal thought. The first postulate of mathematics says 'a point has no breath', but something without breath is not, it does not exist. Yet reality do exist. In mathematics reality is abstract, simplified, non-organic, it does not exist, it has no parts, and so for a mathematician, for a man of the company for whom you are a number, a price, your extinction seems irrelevant.

There are infinite space-time perceptions relative to the complexity of the space-time perceptor. Science merely studies the human eye>world]. That single world is 'a relative human space', , a relative 'complex holograph' of Reality of communicative forces, a relative virtual world, made of a selection of Times=forms of all what there is out there, that shape a certain space of all the infinite spaces that space-time beings see.

Reality instead is an infinite number of mind-worlds=points of view, one for each 'sentient' species of Reality, that creates in each pov-focus, a 'pictorial perspective' of the external Reality.

It is now clear why science does not see the organic Reality of multiple species in constant communication through all types of forces. The answer is that science expresses his truths only through clocks, and mathematical numbers. Yet mathematics are a language limited to  show only the abstract surface of things.

 

The Simplicity Of Mathematics

 

The loss of the internal parts of species, of their organic nature, caused by the Euclidean simplification of species as points without volume has created some errors that limit our knowledge of the biological, organic Reality:

 

•       First abstract mathematics deny communication as the basis of Universal events. In reality what points-species do is to communicate forces which carry information and/or energy. Yet in mathematics, points are void and do not share -communicate- anything. So forces of communication and all particles studied with mathematics, also become abstract, mindless energy. Reality becomes in this manner dead, mute, "scientific."

 

•       As a result of that death of communication, the creation of many species of Reality is not understood in organic terms, as a process of transfer of information and energy, but as a mechanical process. 

 

•       The denial of communication among species denies social evolution and promotes chaotic, destructive theories of reality . In a non-Euclidean organic Reality of points with parts, species have internal organs of information and energy, able to perceive each other with communication forces. They organize themselves in social networks through social, communicative evolution. Atoms share electrons to become molecules. Molecules share atoms to become macromolecules. Macromolecules share mino-molecules and organize cells. Cells share blood-energy and nervous information to become bodies. Humans share verbal information to become 'History'.  In reality [not in Euclidean mathematics] from microcosms, to macrocosms, communicative species, with will to act, in the limited Reality they perceive, organize themselves into complex systems. Yet in Euclidean Sciences, despite growing evidence that shows "all herds" interacting with each other, this organic Reality becomes dead and chaotic.

 

•       Another consequence of a single space-time is a constant deformation of the multiple causes of Reality, which is modular. Since each point participates of the processes involved in creation. Yet in the E-Reality that is perceived from that single human point of view, all other causes are simplified.

Nothing then works. Reality seems chaotic because we are trying to create artificial order from the single human p.o.v., from a single abstract graph.

 

A lot of consequences and causes are not perceived. We think often that a single cause [ceteris paribus cause] is the only reason reality exists.

The error of ceteris paribus causes is very extended in all sciences, because the scientist goes with his abstract conceptualization, of a continuum single frame of reference, and feels satisfied wit a single cause. In reality, in a organic Reality of networks of communication and infinite organic points, there are constantly infinite little causes to every consequence. So our E-equations that do not account for all the organic points of view that have dynamic influences over each relative event, fail to understand such phenomena. Chaos merely means that we do not know all the influences from where it comes the order. That we have a 'chaotic', single perspective.

 

•       The non-existence of organic parts, the informative and energy organs of species, becomes an error of moral order. This error is fundamental to explain the extinctive capacity of science. "Minds" are converted by mathematics into abstract points without linguistic perception. Reality then becomes physical, "material." Languages, minds  and forces of communication are ignored.   Where only the Cartesian Human Eye and space is accepted as real, and perceptive.

 

•       Life is defined by Cartesian science in terms of movement and energy; instead of perception and intelligence, as old philosophers used to define it. Life became energy, instead of information. Reality lost its rational, tempo-logical nature, and became spatial energy. Space, force, no longer time, perception, mattered. Energy no longer logic-intelligence, became the right thing to be because still, inner virtual worlds had disappeared from the graph of Cartesian scientists. Yet as a king, a stock trader, a CEO, a black hole, a DNA, a Computer CPU, and a Sun well know, to be fixed, and yet attract to you forms of energy, that desire your command of a language=force of communication, is the best position of power. The true nature of existence. Perceptive, causal stillness was the meaning of the Aristotelian concept of multiple unmoved Gods, 'focusing' Reality. Yet with Descartes a dead Reality of points with no parts appeared. So science started to describe mechanically, in abstract ways, forms who had a 'how' based in communicative forces and linguistic perception, besides their 'mechanic movements', ruled by mathematics with no parts, now ignored.

Abstract science had set the pre-conditions to perceive Reality as a dead Reality, with man as the only intelligent eyes. This no longer holds today in relativistic science.

It is self-evident that mathematics as it is understood today, in terms of abstract numbers which represent herds of real beings, of organic Non-E Points, equalized in mathematical descriptions, are a very poor way of knowledge, in as much as it empties us of virtual worlds, it simplifies us and itifies reality. Specially when applied to humans [statistics, economics], that control man through prices, and equal men and machines or allow to handle men, as objects, is a lethal weapon, that makes of man just another abstract point-number. In fact the most modern technological, mathematical nations such as pre-war Germany, today America, show a lack of concern for human non-abstract rights, which are appalling compared to old verbal societies, that had not forgotten the importance of the inner parts and words of human beings. It is necessary to know and explain the limits of mathematics, specially in the study of economical and social sciences, their indifference to the rights of life-Nature - our organic space - to the rights of non-technological human beings. Or else we will eliminate man who is from an abstract point of view, less efficient than the machines with whom economists compare us through abstract prices and productivity-costs.

It is urgent to explain the constant cheating that mathematics cause to humanity, since it does not care for us, it treats us as beings whose volumes, internal worlds, feelings and hopes of survival are ignored.

 

Despite its errors, science ignores other languages. The Galilean px.

 

Further on science only cares about mathematics. So it cannot improve his understanding of Reality with other languages such as words. Science does not give the same value to verbal truths than to mathematical truths. That error limits the capacity of Science to help mankind in his ultimate goal: to know.

The error of the abstraction of scientific statements, has to be found in the limits of mathematical languages to describe properly the organic Reality.

We can specifically explain the error when we analyze what is a language:

 

"A language is a relative perception of Reality, biased to favor the perspective of the species that talks the language".

Such biological definition of a language is in tune with our present knowledge of linguistics: species talk languages to inform themselves about Reality, and use that information to survive. So languages tend to make their speakers the center of Reality.

We call that property, the "Galilean, or Cartesian paradox'. Since our light perception makes the Earth a still center of Reality [Galilean paradox], and the mathematical version of that perception makes the Cartesian graph the only graph of reality.

The Cartesian graph, is a particular linguistic case of the selfishness of all point of view of Reality.

 

We call it the 'Galilean paradox':

"all forms of Reality perceive=measure Reality from a limited numbers of languages, and confuse reality with their perception."

We confuse reality with the languages we measure reality.

Two examples: we say a truth is a linguistic sentence. We say: you are tall is a truth. You are tall is just a sentence that simplifies a truth: you, a tall person. You are the truth. The sentence is only a mirror, a simplification of the truth. So happens with a mathematical statement.

 

In reality the content of truth of a certain linguistic statement about a certain being of Reality increases as more languages=mirrors are applied to that being. Relativity is synonymous of true knowledge: in reality we observe Reality from multiple logic languages. Yet the total truth belongs only to the being in all its cycles of energy and information, that an external observer never will be able to scan totally without modifying them [Uncertainty principle].

Reality has the truth about Reality.

All other truths will be simplified, and centered from a certain point of perception, that deforms from that point, reality. We call that constant deformation of perception caused by the need for languages and frames of reference the Galilean paradox. Since the main case is the Earth's deformation of his movement. The Earth seems still, because from the Earth it operates the Galilean paradox. The Earth fixes reality and measures it with light and gravitation, creating a false image of reality. Reality has the Earth as the center of Reality only in your senses. Your perception cheats you. Makes you superior, makes you the center of Reality. It also downplays the living nature of Reality, and upgrades the capacity of your languages, of your mind. It indeed makes you the center of Reality.

 

The Galilean Px will be applied latter to show how errors of selfish arrogance construct human history. Since humans deny perception to all other sentient forms of nature in order to use them as energy of man, even when that denial distorts truth.

 

Brains and languages map distorted visions of reality. We call those distorted visions of reality "worlds', or "Eye-worlds". Eye-worlds are virtual truths, relative linguistic truths over the total Universal truth, which cannot be communicated in its totality. Since only Reality holds all the information about its self. Truths are relative statements, conditioned by the language in which they are expressed. In that view scientific truths, become relative truths conditioned both by the ¥-language of man [1-10% of reality=non dark matter] that we use to gather information; and by the A-E logic languages of human reason. Our languages of perception therefore are our limits of truth: One of those limited human languages, light, decoder of spatial perception, is rather Universal, and shared by many species of Times. The other linguistic communicator - verbal thought, decoder of temporal perception - is an internal, bio-logical species, proper only of man.

All those languages have followed since A-E Science was 'invented', in his path of historical evolution, an increasing degree of complexity, which has enriched Reality of man. As man evolved, those languages evolved even faster, directing in this manner modern history through certain arrows of linguistic evolution: the arrow of ¥-light and image evolution, the arrow of verbal and religious evolution, and the arrow of machine and digital evolution.

Yet Aristotelian and Euclidean postulates on verbal and mathematical thought are not, [contrary to 'imprinted belief'], absolute truths. They are partial truths that allow man to reflect in words and equations [mathematical languages], certain Universal forms=reality, of the total Reality. We do not perceive reality, when we talk or make equations on that reality - not even when we see - but a simplification-image of reality. Yet the approximation given by verbal-Aristotelian, and Mathematical-Euclidean thought, is rather accurate, and satisfies our need for a human representation of Reality. We accept those linguistic approximations as good enough, with certain reservations. Since the rules of Aristotelian logic and Euclidean Mathematics are not proved. Those initial postulates of Euclidean mathematics and Aristotelian logic are probably simplifications of the rules by which Reality organizes all type of eye>worlds. So this book is very much concerned with those initial postulates, or mainframe of human languages: the five postulates of Euclidean Geometry, and the rules of causality of Aristotelian Logic, in which humanity has based his scientific perception of reality.

The Euclidean Geometry defines the mathematical space in which our eye communicates.

The Logic of Aristotle defines the verbal temporal and spatial perception of the words of man.

Could other eye-words exist based in other Mathematical statements or logic statements?

How such eye-worlds would be?

The answer to the first question is yes. Einstein analyzed the gravitational Reality and found that it did not follow the geometry of light, it had a different form, and we suppose that gravitational perceptors [masses and stars who knot gravitation as we knot light in the eye] would have different eye-worlds. They probably perceive dark matter, since it is gravitational matter. So they probably have more volume of perception which is a logic assumption since they are bigger species than man is.

On the other hand we have already dealt with the discontinuity of time, that causes causality from past to future and future to past [energy and information causality]. So unicausality as Aristotle and ceteris paribus analysis establish is false. We have also considered all statements, linguistic truths, probable truths on the total event=existence they describe. So Aristotelian truth, absolute truth is always a probability of the total existence of the event.

Science of course cannot study beyond his instruments which measure basically light -as our eyes do, but with more precision, with metal-eye precision... So science is a probability of truth, despite its arrogant use of such terms. Scientific causes are partial causes of the total causes of an event.

 

Abstract, Euclidean mathematics of species without parts.

 

Once we have argued the relative truth of languages, it should be clear that mathematics are merely the spatial perception of the Human eye, in a single language, that of light, through the 3 dimensions of light, width-magnetic field, height-electric field, and length-speed. Since our temporal perception does not vary, it can be taken as a constant of the Human Reality.  Only when mathematics become physics and studies species with different speeds of  time - of perception and action -reaction - it is needed to add a fourth dimension of temporal coordinates to mathematics.

Then mathematics become physics, and human relativistic clock-time equalizes all those other speeds in abstract terms. We talk of two degrees of abstraction , that reduce the total information about the living Reality: physics of 4 dimensional mathematics, with a human single times that simplifies all other times.  Euclidean geometry of 3 dimensions that simplifies in one more dimension the living Reality.

So Euclidean geometry is merely the virtual world of light, void of temporal discontinuity, with the human temporal eye-world as the constant of time perception.

We explained the Cartesian graph of mathematics, and its error of continuity We can add a second reason why mathematics lack a temporal dimension: the enormous speed of light gives light minimal temporal depth in our environment [the Earth's crust], and max. spatial distance. The light eye perceives reality in spatial terms, and its  geometry [mathematics] become the spatial scanner of man.

Man improves that defect of eye-mathematics with verbal thought which has much more temporal depth and acts as the time scanner of man.

In all what concerns survival and existence -a temporal function- verbal thought is much more intelligent than mathematics. For that reason in a healthy organism of history verbal thought should control mathematical truths, since the survival and existence of man, is more important than our spatial images.

This is a fact that scientists and economists forget: survival is temporal and has to be argued in verbal terms. Mathematics are spatial and should be used only for spatial matters. We should not take decisions on the survival and extinction of human species in mathematical terms, [as we do in abstract economics that promotes the mathematical abstraction , man=price=product, where man is equalized to machines in fields of labor and consume, thanks to the abstract concept of a price-monetary value].

 

What we call science is still today basically abstract mathematics, based not in the organic logic of Reality, but in their spatial description with abstract Cartesian graphs, and light metal senses.

We will use with such abstract science a healthy criticism of his many limits, given its poor tools of perception of Reality. Unfortunately Euclidean mathematics are used for scientists, who apply science to industrial and war processes. We will criticize from abstract science, such perception of a dead Reality, that justifies his evolution of machines and weapons that prey over life, and make of mathematics the language of extinction of life species, and human beings, under rhetoric of truth and knowledge. Those who use mathematics to extinct life should know that extinct beings do not know anything...

11. Superiority of verbal sciences: Theory of Evolution and the bio-logical method

 

Darwin and Plank. New verbal and mathematical, relative ideas.

 

Indeed, far superior to the abstraction of Euclidean science, there is a bio-logic theory that truly explains why species survive and become extinct: Theory of Evolution now applied to the evolution of languages. When Darwin came with a verbal theory of reality that was also relativistic, as Eastern philosophy, and logic based in facts, as experimental science, he gave a chance to man to survive by understanding the laws of the Universe.... He said men were not the center of the Universe, but a stage in the evolution of species of space-time, coming from simpler species such as the ape. Then in the XX C. Physicists who were exploring the Universe with mathematical languages and sensorial machines that worked as human eyes [telescopes, cameras] and human brains [chips, clocks], realized their instruments and languages were not absolute. They merely perceived a part of reality, and then transformed that perception into a simplified version, of reality called 'Euclidean mathematics'.

Quantic theory proved we could not observe accurately the Universe [Heisenberg Principle of Uncertainty]. Einstein proved the wider Universe had a non-Euclidean visual structure. There was there a substance called dark matter that we could not see....

Darwin, Plank, Einstein, and our instruments that do not perceive dark matter, and the dimensions of gravitational Non-Euclidean space, have proved that we live in a Universe, far more relativistic, mysterious, and alien to the human intelligence, that western thought believed.

We talk then of two clear ages in mathematical knowledge parallel to the two ages of verbal knowledge: the age of Newtonian-galilean absolutist, anthropomorphic science, parallel to the age of anthropomorphic religions; and the age of Einsteinian-relativistic science, parallel to the Eastern verbal age of relativistic thought.

Languages are not truth, but mirrors of the Universe. The Universe is not written only in mathematics as Galilee thought. Mathematics is only one of the languages that perceives the Universe [Karl Popper]. Computers confirm that, since they have developed with mathematics a visual vision of the Universe, that we might call 'digital intelligence', that is able to perform task of comprehension that humans perform with verbal languages, using mathematical algorithms. What is truth, the smell of the dog, the words of man, the numbers of computers? They are all relativistic, linguistic knowledge.

 

Those facts are still argued by many scientists, which do not want to leave their privileged position based in mathematics, as the priests of Vatican did not want to leave their privileged position based in verbal thought.

But proves are overwhelming. Dark matter that is not in our space, perceived with light-eyes, is maybe 99% of reality.

On the other hand, at the beginning of the XX C., Fitzgerald, Lorentz and Einstein discovered that clocks are not the only way to measure time. That in certain regions of the Universe clocks go faster or slower, there are other times. Biologists discovered the circadian cycles o beings, that also measure time with other rhythms. So neither scientific instruments not mathematics understand all the time and space of the Universe.

We have reached now with mathematics, at the same level of knowledge that Taoists and Buddhists reached with words. An age of relativism of knowledge, relative to our instruments and languages of perception.

 

A historic anecdote can contrast both levels of 'perceptive knowledge'.

In the XVIII century, the English arrived to China and tried to sell the Chinese their clocks to measure time. Taoists priests told them they were not interested in 'their ugly, simple, mechanical times'. That they 'preferred to see the living times of the Universe'. The English did not understand anything. Why the Chinese were talking about many times? According to them time was singular, abstract, the clock-time.  Yet the English, instead of learning about living times, angry because they sold so little gadgets, came back with canons and opium, [a lethal, but appealing product to the Chinese mind, since it opened doors to the perception of those other times and spaces]; and they destroyed the Chinese civilization... 

Had they learned about the 'living cycles of time', western science and western culture, could have improved for the better.

 

Since, unlike in Eastern thought, the age of  scientific relativism had not arrived to Europe. Today mathematical relativism is very young, and it needs to be developed further, as we will try to do in this book.

 

 

The need to advance relativistic, mathematical science.

 

Einstein's seemed close to do it. He started calling his theory, 'Theory of Relativity'. But as we shall see latter, Einstein did not go far enough. He broke with certain conventions of absolutist mathematics-physics, but he still kept the Cartesian plane of a single space-time continuum based in the 3 dimensions of light perception [height, length and width, equivalent to the 3 directions of the magnetic, electric and speed directions of light].

So he accepted subconsciously the light-plane as the plane of space.

That is the origin of so many contradiction in the world of physics today. Einstein and many physicists that followed him said that the gravitational Universe has a Non-Euclidean structure, and yet it uses the Euclidean plane.

 

But if space was more complex and wider than Dogmatic mathematics believed, so happened with Time.

Einstein found that there are many speeds of clocks, many time-speeds, and yet scientists still think that the particular clock speed on Earth is absolute time...

So it is necessary to correct those errors, to be brave enough to break with mathematical conventions, in order to understand with eastern science, the Universe, as Eastern verbal philosophers did.

To that aim is useful to put together verbal philosophies of eastern thought, and western mathematical knowledge, in what some scientists start to call the 'third age of science'.

The bridge to put together those two theories of the Universe is curiously Theory of Evolution, a theory about the existence and extinction of reality that uses both, verbal and mathematical statements...

Let us see how this might happen.

 

The third age of science.

 

The third age of science arrives when we combine the two approaches of knowledge verbal knowledge and mathematical knowledge through Theory of Evolution. We no longer try to search for absolute knowledge, of all the details of reality, but a Theory or model of reality that explains why species of space-time, minds that perceive space and time with different languages and forces [such as words, mathematics, light, smell or gravitation], exist. And how their existence is selected. Since the Universe is made of such species, and regions that contain either spatial energy or temporal information, if we understand the processes of creation and destruction of those minds and regions of space-time, we will understand the rules of existence of the Universe.

Once this becomes obvious, it is easy to see how the selection process of minds that perceive space and time works.

There exist many minds and ways to perceive the Universe. Each being, each mind has a model-map-mirror-image-virtual world of the Universe. How all those mind-brains and the surfaces of 'organic space', the 'bodies of energy', they inform become ordered?

Through the selection of species. Selection of species not only applies to the stronger bodies, but also to the languages and minds which are more intelligent, which gather more information about the Universe. Those species such as man in the Earth, maybe black holes in the 'Total Universe' of multiple gravitational space-times, process much more information than other species around them. They are 'linguistic top predators', and so they control their ecosystems, [the Earth's crust in the human case, the galaxy in the case of black holes], shaping them to their image and resemblance.

Galaxies turn around black holes. The Earth is molded by human actions.

So those species of minds that perceive better space and time, survive in the Universe, act-react faster, and hunt or enslave simpler species.

The order of the Universe of multiple space-times is therefore a biological order. The future belongs to those species that better understand space and time. Those species will reproduce in the future , causing 'physically' the appearance of the future , and extinguishing or ordering the other species.

Those processes might be conscious or unconscious, organic or mechanical, but they are real. So 'mechanical black holes' attract and destroy all other gravitational beings. The sun orders gravitational beings of lesser gravitational information [mass] such as planets, and comets...

In the 'ecosystem' of gravitational information, to have more gravity, more mass is the sure path to survival.

In the 'ecosystem' of light-information, to have better eyes, and better visual languages is the sure path to survival.

 

God, the logic of change, in that sense is a biological logic, or a being whose existence and impersonal laws are evolutionary laws, that provoke the extinction and existence of reality.

 

What is the position of man in that ladder of minds that perceive the Universe? Obviously we are the top predator mind on the Earth. But there are two reasons why we should reflect about the fragility of that position.

We do not perceive gravitation, which is the force that 'perceives 90-99% of reality'. So we are not such a great mind. We are a light mind, and our knowledge is basically light-based.

Imagine you are a cockroach. Cockroaches are the top predator chemical systems of information on Earth. They could feel very arrogant, since in their language-universe they are top predators, and they do not understand any other language. At most they have a 'hint' that there exists a wider language of information that scans much more universe, called Light.

But they cannot grasp or dominate that information very well, so basically when they see species of that other bigger Universe, they become frightened and run away, into the comfort of their well known dark Universe, 'enlightened' by chemical smells.

 From the perspective of our bigger light Universe, to have a 'chemical mind' such as the one of cockroaches should not be a reason of 'great arrogance'.

Yet man who has a 'cockroach mind', compared to a possible mind that could perceive the entire gravitational Universe [maybe the black hole], feels however an enormous arrogance.

This is truly dangerous. Imagine the cockroach that felt so arrogant as to think she can wonder freely in the land of light-space. Soon she will find a true top predator that will crash it 'like a cockroach'. Curiosity kills the cat.

In the case of man, this might happen soon.

Indeed, we are developing a new kind of mind, of virtual world of light who seem to have the potential of becoming superior to man in a very short period. 'Digital minds', computers, nets and robots, are evolving very fast, and by many standards they have become superior to man in their capacity to handle visual languages, specially mathematics... Will they substitute man as the top predator light-mind on Earth?

Arrogance is indeed the capital sin, the sin against survival.

 

Moral rules in a Complex Universe.

 

Human knowledge advances towards the third age of science: there is not a single reality, but knowledge is relative, depends on our sensorial and linguistic perception of space and time, and builds a 'virtual world', an image of the real, total Universe.

Those virtual worlds however are fundamental, since there is a constant selection of the best virtual worlds of the Universe. The Universe is evolving, it is growing in space and time [space expands, and time lasts longer], and it is growing in the way its species process spatial energy and temporal information with their brains and bodies.

The change we see in the Universe are changes related to the extinction and reproduction of such brain-body systems, and the way they affect the spatial reality and temporal forms of the Universe.

Immediately we can apply those concepts to study the evolution of celestial bodies, based in gravitational and electromagnetic processes of energy and information... Astro-biology is born. We can also study the evolution of perception on Earth, a planet that receives its energy and information from light. Indeed, species on Earth are selected by its capacity to understand light-energy ,and light information. So first plants who understood light-energy dominated. Then animals who were able to process through eyes, light into information became dominant. Finally men who added a 'temporal language' to their eye perception, the language of words, controlled the Earth. But men are now developing digital languages, mathematics, in machines, that are taking over the Ecosystem of the Earth, and displacing the animal ecosystem [nature] and the human ecosystem [history].

This final age of the Machine is clearly dangerous to the survival of man, because we stop being the top predator brain-body system, as we evolve robotics and other machines of science, with better perceptive senses and brains [camera-eyes, chip-brains].

The cycle is completed: our conclusions in the third age of science, are similar to those of the Verbal masters of relativistic Eastern thought. Man should understand the laws of change in the universe, the existence of other parallel brains, who perceive other regions of space and time, that man ignore. Then we should draw obvious laws of human behavior, according to those universal laws, and promote our role as top predator brains on Earth. We should not act with arrogance, and destroy nature - our biologic ecosystem - and pretend to be God, building machines more intelligent than us. Instead, we should respect the laws of evolution, use them to the advantage of man, and develop a harmonic vision of the universe, with both verbal and mathematical languages.

It is the old vision of Chinese Taoists. Lao-tse said: "when more complex instruments men discover, more wars and destruction happens".

The 'third age of science' implies the knowledge of the living Universe, and the need to be cautious in that Universe, and use the bio-logic rules of existence to the advantage of man.

 

The third age of science, fight between languages.

 

We had a first age of science, when verbal philosophers studied the Universe with human senses, eyes and words. Its summit was in Asia, with Buddha and Lao-tse, which understood quite well the Universe with words. Then we had the second age of science, which studied the Universe with machines, telescopes, cameras, computers, and numbers. Basically we have got to the same conclusions.

That knowledge is relative and different depending on the senses and languages we use. If you see it, or you smell it, or you touch it, or you put it on numbers, you will have a different visions of the Universe.

The scientific method merely looks at it, with metal-senses, clocks, telescopes, computers, cameras, and numbers. So the third science is the science of all languages. It does not think like religions that words are truth, or like science that mathematics are truths, but it studies, why there are languages, and senses with relative truths that build up different images of the Universe. If you look at the flowers on the garden, you see a red flower. A bee sees a yellow flower. An ant smells the flower. So does a dog. The Earth feels its weight. A blind man caress her. For all of them it is a flower, but the image they have is different. What is then the flower? A smell, an image, a weight, a color? It all depends on the mind that perceives it. Each language, each mind sees a different form of space and rhythm of time. So no one has the truth about that flower. Only the flower has all the real information about the flower. The scientist looks at her with his metal-minds, you with your human mind, the dog, with an smelling mind. An artist with a stylish mind? Which one is better? The Universe that science shows us is only an image of the Universe, the mirror that machines have on it. So because science is not truth, the correct answer to knowledge is to choose and prefer human knowledge, since in a subjective Universe, the only truth that matters is the survival and evolution of our mind and senses. This is the traditional answer of art and verbal religions to science.  Scientific knowledge has always to be submissive to ethic and aesthetic knowledge, to art, and development of human senses. Since an extinct species knows nothing, ethics and the conservation of nature are values superior to digital information. An answer validated by the laws of evolution, and the laws of social organisms, when we apply them to history and its  language. The purpose of the next chapters is to prove that such a fight between languages structures history. Artists have been right in siding with human language throughout history.

 

 

12. Survival of man requires a change in our top predator languages.

 

The Two Ages of History: Verbal History and Digital Economics.

 

We conclude that the fundamental divide of human history is between the age of Words, when verbal thought was the dominant language of information in history, (-150.000, 1602) and the age of digital thought, when money and science, two languages of digital nature, replaced verbal thought as the languages that direct and create reality - now a reality of machines. Now, machines are top predators promoted by the scientific method of clock-measuring of time and telescope-perception, by companies that reproduce machines and lobbies that control political power. Those structures replace the verbal, religious vision of man as the center of the universe.

 

The digital age of history is also the age of extinction of human history, since the eco[nomic]system now belongs to a new species: metalife. The age of verbal truths and human truths no longer exists. In 1602, stock companies with paper money started the evolution of machines. They conquered the Dutch Government, the English Government, Europe and America. The world became a bio-economy whose aim now is to reproduce machines, to work on them and to consume them for money. This means the end of bio-history, of Wor[l]ds [worlds made with words to the image and resemblance of man] of human beings as top predators and creators of the future .

We will study in the next chapters, those two ages of History, but before we do so, let us consider what the 'ideal age of history', one in which man is top predator and follows his natural will might had been - if digital worlds and animetals were not.