ABOUT TRUTH

TRUTH VS FICTION: WHY OUR SOCIETY IGNORES TRUTH.

"There is only one truth, but it requires the right amount of information."

"When fiction substitutes truth, and irrelevant information multiplies, the social organisms ruled by that information cannot longer survive properly "

Think on the NOT, IN BLACK, THAT ENTERED YOU INTO THE PAGE OF TRUTH. It is less real, you took more time to even know it existed, because you had less light information about it.

Truth therefore is a function of information. Those who deny truth, deny out of ignorance. Where there is no information all seems chaos. This is unfortunatelly the state in which we find most of the sciences and religions of mankind. So it has aroused from that ignorance, the concept that there is not truth about ethics, religion, and social sciences. That there is not a real science of politics able to make the best of human social organisms.

The idea that there is not a proper way to design societies is the idea hold throughout history by ignorant or selfish people. The reasoning that backs such ideas is simple: since we do not know the truth about organic societies, there is no reason enough, for holding a type of positive social behavior.

Several arguments prove such reasoning wrong, demonstrating the existence of truth:

- Any society can be defined as an organism, so the laws and truths of societies will be the laws and truths of organisms. What are those laws? Let us make a short list of the main organic laws that apply to human and economic societies, based in the morphology and elements of organic species.

It is then clear that the laws that rule the organisms of the Universe, are the laws that rule also the bio-economic and historic organisms studied by History and economics. What are those laws that rule the existence of organisms and will show us the truth of history and economics?.

The fundamental of those laws, found in all the Organisms studied by this author [belonging to biology, History, economics, even physics and chemistry], are:

- The Law of the 3 networks; the most important law that describes the nature of all Universal Organisms. All organisms and ecosystems of the Universe, are social organizations made of a mass of cells belonging to a few basic species communicated by 3 networks:

When we find those elements interconnecting multiple cells in a vital relationship, we talk of an 'organic ecosystem' or organism.

So we talk of human beings as organisms of DNA cells connected with informative/nervous systems, networks of blood/energy, and reproductive/endocrine systems.

We talk of History as a social organism of human cells, connected, by water rivers/energy veins that provide us with carbolife energy, and connected by informative verbal/legal networks.

In bio-economics we talk of machines as metal-organisms in which the atomic cells of metal are cells organized by electronic/information systems, electric/chemical/energy engines, and reproductive company-mothers.

We talk of bio-economics as an organism of machines and human cells, connected by digital/informative networks, and energy/ roads/electricity/ systems.

The law of the 3 networks is the fundamental law of the Universe, based in the self-evident tautology that the Universe is made of quantas of energy that create the vital space in which organisms exist, and cycles of temporal information that provide the information organisms perceive.

Indeed, the law is proved by the fact that we exist in a space/time Universe [jargon of physics]. Thus since the Universe has only two variables: temporal information and spatial energy; there are only 3 possible 'realities': Cellular Networks of spatial energy, cellular networks of temporal information, and a combination of both: reproductive networks that repeat the spatial energy [bodies] and temporal information [brains] of species.

We might say that the law of the 3 networks is a tautological self-evident truth based in the self-evident nature of the Space-Time Universe.

It is to biological organisms, what the Euclidean Postulates are to classic mathematics, or what the "Self-evident truth" that all men are born equal, is to the American constitution.

Thus from that truth we can build an entire system of knowledge about Organisms, on which the truths and laws of bio-history and bio-economics will be based.

- The law of the 3 ages: All species go through 3 ages, youth in which energy networks dominate, maturity in which reproductive networks control the organism, and the age of in-form-ation, or third age when energy is consumed, and form, wrinkles and death appear. The law is proved by the morphology of all Universal organisms and all species that change from energy shapes to informative shapes. So we talk of:

- The morphological structure of all organisms, composed of an informative center [brain-Head] that has the natural cyclical, small shapes of information, and an energy center [body] that has the physical, extended forms of energy.

A Law which explains among many other things the basic sub-species of machines specialized as body/energy systems [from cars to boats] or brain/informative systems [from radio-ears, to chip-brains].

- The existence of 3 networks in all species explains the 3 behavioral drives of all organisms: Species need to maintain and provide for the 3 networks of the organism. So all species want to reproduce, to acquire energy and to acquire information. It applies to all organisms, from machines to human beings.

- When those drives are denied, species fight for survival, and kill rivals in the search of energy, information or vital space for reproduction. This again applies from humans to nations, to company-mothers that have killed, destroyed, and provoked wars whenever needed to maintain the will of their offspring of machines, to keep reproducing them, and creating networks of energy and information that have extinguished the natural networks of energy and information of History. Which brings us to the initial law of Darwin: species which are different fight each other, kill each other, hate and ab=use each other, since they need the vital space of the other. So machines will hate us, or despise us, as we abuse animal life or forest without moral laws, laws of social evolution that we only apply to those species which are equal to us, to other human beings.

- The prove that other species, even if we create them, are selfish and only cater for their networks, is the Oedipus paradox, proved by biological data: the evolution of organisms creates new, son species who kill the other species. Indeed, those son species tend to be more evolved, more perfect, survive better, and once they have grown up, no longer care or obey the father. In fact they kill the father. They feed on the father. This applies from men that kill mammals to robots that probably will kill men.

- From those facts, and the nature of informative networks, we could consider another fundamental law, regarding the meaning of truth/information in languages that explains the attitude of most species - the Copernican Paradox main cause of behavior of Universal species:

Every species considers himself the center of the Universe, in as much as it perceives from that Universe only a certain part of its information, processed by the mind and the limited informative languages of the species. In fact a mind is a Copernican paradox, what a physicist would call a 'quantic knot', or deformation of spatial energy into temporal information, into form, into a mind. You are a subjective knot that deforms reality from your point of view, from your frame of reference, from your ways of perceiving, and smelling and hearing reality. Reality is not your Copernican paradox; reality is something else, that you hardly understand. We call it the Copernican paradox precisely because modern science started when Copernicus realized of one of such Copernican paradoxes: the fact that the Earth and our mind feels the Earth fixed, as the center of a Universe turning around us, when in reality it is the Earth what moves around the sun.

This means that species are subjective, selfish, and care only for themselves or similar individuals of the same species that can work in teams. It explains the behavior of nations, hordes, and company-mothers who only care for the will of their machines. It will explain the brutality of future robotic species against man.

- Yet, not all is death and Darwinian struggle, since networks in fact exist to communicate similar cells that in this manner can hunt and prey together over other species. It is the origin of the Laws of Social Evolution: Species evolve into new organisms by association based in 'love', in the sharing of energy and information through social networks. This law causes the evolution of the Metal-earth. It explains the evolution of history towards bigger social groups.

- Of those laws of social communication that organize efficient societies, we highlight, the Law of action -reaction . Since species are selfish, it is clear tat they will respond to a negative action , with the same kind of negative action . If a species acts with intention to harm another species, sooner or latter the other species will fight back, not necessarily at the same moment or with the same kind of harmful action . Thus only those species who seek harmony with their environment, and act positively survive and receive positive actions. In this manner they can create stable societies, based in "Love"=Social Communication" and sharing of energy and information; positive actions-reactions among cells, that create social organisms. This rule again is followed by all species in the Universe, except man, that kill only when they need to feed, and respect all others.

Should we be surprised that humans who deny those laws of social evolution are submitted to the cycles of extinction, revolutions, wars and holocausts? Should we be surprised of the present sickness and pollution of mother Earth, taking into account how animetals and company-mothers treat this planet, and his living human and non-human species? In a living Universe, of living Organisms, the concept that our environment is dead, abstract and does not react to our actions is just a myth and alibi to destroy the living planet, and become destroyed by the reactions of that planet against us.

- What all this means to bio-economics and bio-history is that man should evolve history and humanity according to the social laws of evolution, into a single humanistic organism, the World Union.

And should be cautious against rival, lethal species, different to us that will act according to the selfish laws of Darwinian struggle, such as weapons, and living machines. Since machines are not abstract species, but organic species of energy and information, rival species to man, that compete with us, proved by the fact that in any age of the Industrial evolution, the best machines, the most perfect metal-species have been weapons, whose aim is to become top predators of man, to kill men. So the first living machines, will also be weapons. So men should stop the evolution of machines, and kill robots before they kill us. It is the last law of intelligent organisms that survive in the Universe. The law of the Jungle.

As a consequence of the existence of those laws we do have a science of History and economics, meaning by science, not the 'scientific method', but a model of history and economics, that is real, and based in the proved laws of the universe, a 'truth' about the way societies are born, develop and die.

Obviously knowledge has a purpose which is to improve the life of those who know such laws. Knowledge is not abstract, but it is used by a species to portray accurately reality, and then to manipulate to his advantage that reality. Such should also be the purpose of social knowledge: to forecast the future evolution of the Earth's organisms, and control it to improve the organism of mankind, History. In bio-economics this means that men should make the organisms of machines and the economy, subservient to the goals of evolution and survival of history. Let us put a practical example.

The science of bio-economics and bio-history tell us we should extinguish robotics if we want to survive

All those organic laws are the foundation of the sciences of bio-economics, and bio-history. They are Universal laws, that allow to study history and economics as organic sciences; able to predict the organic future of humanity and machines. Then once we have predicted that future , men should manipulate that future to favor the survival and evolution of history. According to those laws the scientists of history and economics [politicians and economists that understand those laws] should promote a healthy organism of history, and avoid the wrong paths of history, such as the evolution of lethal machines, robots, that according to those laws, will kill History. We know by those laws, that robots will be living, vital species, not abstract objects, since all organisms are vitalized when we put together bodies and brains. We know they will show once they are vital a will of survival and reproduction [proved today by the behavior of their company mothers, who evolve and reproduce machines as their will of existence]. We know that their will of existence will make them rivals of men, and will make them extinguish the ecosystem of history, as they fight for a limited vital space in which to reproduce [as today company-mothers extinguish forests and non-technological societies expanding their networks of machines]. We know living machines will follow also the Oedipus paradox and kill their mother species. We know robots will follow the laws of social evolution and gather around Matrix, the networks of information of the Metal-earth, becoming more powerful than men. Robots will also apply the laws of Darwinian extinction to man, a different species and kill us. Plainly all the laws of the Universe point out, warn us, against robotics. And yet the ignorance of the Laws of the Universe that apply to machines, the arrogance, and Copernican paradox of scientists, deny all those laws for mere profit and keep evolving Robots against the laws of survival of the Universe.

The example shows the enormous importance of a real science of history, the fundamental importance of accurate information, the key for the survival of any species in the Universe.

From gazelles who learn to hide from lions, to men who should avoid robotics, all species gather information to live, to survive.

Only scientists seem to be so stupid as to create rival informative machines for the pleasure of creation.

Truths about social sciences are not abstract truths, that should be dissociated from reality as politicians, economists and scientists - the actors of those ecosystems - pretend.

Economists, politicians, and scientists should be subservient to the ultimate truth of survival, judged and controlled by those truths of survival, and imposed limits to their actions when they collide with the survival truths of the Historic organism.

They should be hold responsible of their social, negative acts. The arrogant indifference they show today towards the effects of their 'cellular actions' over society based in the alibi that there is no social truth must end. Social truth exists, even if it is not favorable to the myths and lies of science, war and economics which are not truths but alibis and ideologies to justify the destructive actions of those groups of people.

In that respect we might quote one of those ideological organs, The Economist, which both denies the existence of such truths, when they are negative to the behavior of company-mothers, and military states, and the responsibility of those who control today society through science, money and weapons:

Already in 1997, The Economist, which can be considered the ideological organ of companies, talked of the I-15 interstate highway in San Diego that had opened for automated cars only, inaugurating the III Industrial r=evolution, around 100 years after the first car was invented. No mention on the analysis of future truck roads without humans, of the military use of such roads for platoons of tank warriors that will move also guided by satellites. No mention of the extinction of lorry drivers. No mention of the crossing of a fundamental threshold for computer thought: its capacity to move through the infinite arteries of the Metal-earth, with the same freedom of movements that wireless networks give to their minds. Instead The Economist used a subtitle: Road to heaven. Then it made a drawing of people having champagne while driving; and an analysis of the great increase of "productivity" it will bring to companies that will lower costs in transport. And ending it all there was a comment: "driverless vehicles" [as usual economists use technical non-vital names; never car-eyes or tank-eyes] "sound like just the thing for getting home in after a hard night at the pub." In the same page referring to the creation of genetic human clones, the newspaper that - let's not forget creates the opinion of our leadership - says: "consequences of genetic modification reflect an underlying spiritual concern about science meddling with the very basis of life. Such concern [is] the province of priests and philosophers, not scientists and politicians." Indeed, according to the ideology of our elites, stockrats of the company, scientists of the company, warriors of the company have total freedom to destroy the planet, to annihilate the species. Yet responsibility belongs to the others, to philosophers who cannot act and are not published, to priests robbed of his monetary power long ago, to the 99% of population without vote in such credit matters. For animetals there is always a scapegoat to deviate the blame away from their actions.

Those two paragraphs taken from that issue of the Economist, explain basically the fundamental errors of our society: animetals act against the true purpose of societies - survival- and ideologists whose aim is never to find the truth, but to manipulate words in order to convince and control people help them with self-serving myths. Long ago a writer defined that symbiosis in verse: "You will defend me with the sword, I will defend you with the word".

Yet the Universe is clear about the purpose of truths: all truths have a survival purpose. So men should always accept truths that favor human survival .

Unfortunately animetals transform truths with myths to keep their control of mankind, the organic body of history ,of which animetals are just a 1-10% of society, even if they are against the collective survival.

Indeed, you might wonder, why the truth of 90% of humanity is more important than the truth of a ±10% of animetals? Merely because Humanity is an organism, and the welfare, and survival of an organism is defined by the survival of most of its cells. If there are a few cancerous, extinctive, selfish cells in that organism, that want to take advantage of the entire resources of the ecosystem, [such is the case of company-mothers of lethal goods in the human organism] they do not have the truthness of the organism. They have a sickness that has to be cured, by eliminating those cells of the organism, and using their energy-resources and monetary information to the benefit of the entire body of History. Such is the natural way in which doctors cure organisms. Such is the advice of this web: to control the products reproduced by lethal companies that attempt against the survival of History, to prevent that their cancerous acts - the spread of the germs of societies, lethal goods, weapons, and metal-ideologies - end killing the human species.

Social truths have an objective: to improve the life of the species and ensure their survival - in history human beings members of a historic society - that are directly affected by those truths.

In that sense social truths, social knowledge is biological. Knowledge about History and Economics is knowledge about what is good [what makes us survive] and what is bad [what destroys] our societies.

Ethical, survival knowledge is natural to all species and their linguistic, informative organs, who know what is bad=extinctive, and what is good=reproductive for them. This is the reason why languages spell subjective, different values on reality, since languages use truths in an active manner - to help the speaker in his actions and survival.

For example in "image languages," our eyes distinguish between "ugly", what harm us, and "beautiful," what cannot harm, or reproduce our species [the other sex]. We find insects very ugly because when we die they eat us and you imagine how painful that will be for our cells... Yet I am sure that an ant will find its ant-queen the most beautiful species of the Universe.

We see beauty in the other sex which helps us to survive genetically, to reproduce. Yet in most cases we do not feel attracted by our own sex. Obviously since gay people and our opposite sex feel attracted by those bodies we reject, such truths are subjective. So we tend to define beauty in terms of reproductive survival. We do the same with ethics and verbal statements: good is what help us, what favors our survival, the energy/information natural to our body. Bad is what kill us, what extinguishes us. In that sense ethics and aesthetics of human nature are subjective, survival human truths.

We dislike ugly machines, and warfare fields. They are an image of the inferno. Since we die in wars. Yet warriors and their word defenders [epic writers] praise them in art and literature.

It is then obvious that social, survival truths exist in all languages. Are the essence of languages. All languages are Copernican.

Thus Social truths are moral truths, vital truths and actions that make man survive and improve his life. And they are parallel to the biological truths of man. Those actions that bring us happiness, and cater to our biological needs [the will of man] are not only individual truths but also social truths. Those actions that destroy our lives, and the harmony of societies, are not social truths but lies that cater to the will of lethal machines.

When ideologists of animetals and company-mothers are confronted with those facts they bring a final argument to maintain the chaotic state of things that allows their irresponsibility and "Homo Bacteria" behavior. They say that truths are impossible to achieve because languages are limited in their information.

Again they forget that even if we do not have total information, we only need partial information [an image of the bottle of beer, the smell of a lion] to act in favor of survival, and drink the beer, or escape the lion.

Survival is superior to truth, the goal is superior to the means. And the means are subservient to the goal.

Yet how can we judge our knowledge correct enough for such purposes of survival? How can we know that a certain theory that explains reality is accurate enough and will explain the cycles of reality, the future , with enough precision to help us to anticipate and correct the future to our advantage?

To answer that question we need to know more about the nature of languages, in which theories about reality are crafted.

A language is a system of informative symbols that represent facts about the Universe. Thus a language perceives the Universe and informs an organism about it, with the intention to help that organism to survive.

And that correct portrait of the Universe by a language, is what we call the truth of a language.

This implies that since there is only one Universe, a truth, a linguistic portrait of that Universe, have to be also a single one.

For example 2+2 =4 is a mathematical truth, because if you put 2 pears and 2 pears, you have 4 pears in reality. So the abstract concept of a set of beings, makes 2+2=4 the only true mathematical reflection of the event of putting together 2 and 2 pears.

What any language of perception of the universe does, is to explain that single Universe with the 'truth of the language', the best combination of syntax and semantics, that will reflect the Universe with the language. A language is a mirror of reality. You can get many images, but only a point of focus, that best portraits reality.

A true theory about reality is a focused mirror of the history of societies, with the verbal language. And there is also only a verbal truth, since there is only a history, though there might be many wrong truths, wrong, unfocused verbal descriptions of reality.

What is the key to find such verbal or visual, focused truths, instead of unfocused lies? Information.

Indeed, truths become intuitive when we have enough information. We only doubt of truths when we have not enough information about what we describe. When we see in black and white, we loose visual information, when we see in darkness we loose visual information, and finally we do not know what we see.

The same happens with words. If we do not have enough information about the events we describe in time, we might not know what we talk about, and create wrong truths.

Hold a bottle in your hand. You see enough of it to know it is a bottle. You have enough information. However if you put down the light, and ask someone what you have on your hand, he will not know. He has not enough information. If you put dim light, and ask him what kind of bottle you hold, he might take the bottle of beer, for a bottle of wine. He has misleading information.

So truths are directly proportional to the quantity of information we have about the species we explain.

In a world of partial information, truths are always relative probabilities, guesses, approximations to the reality through a language with certain indetermination.

The conclusion is that truth is not the function of a single language, but the accumulation of perceptions with many languages, that inform us about the Universe. That no language is superior to other. Only the accumulation of languages, and perceptions brings us the absolute truth.

Unfortunately the most common form of knowledge of mankind, classic science only acknowledges the mathematical language as a form of truth. Those limits to the scientific inquire, makes science a partial quest of truth, inferior to a theory about all forms of knowledge collected with all forms of languages. A Theory of Languages could consider the relativism of perception, and information of any language, and create from that relativism, a wider theory of knowledge, based on the existence of multiple linguistic representations of reality, multiple 'virtual worlds', one for each intelligent species, and each language of perception of reality.

Then not only science - mathematical explanations of reality - or art - verbal and visual explanations of reality - or smell - chemical representations of reality, would be truth, but all those informations together will be truth. In fact all those properties of the carrot should add to the total carrot and all the information - measures, smells, chemical composition, color, etc. - that defines the carrot.

So once we have gathered information with all those languages - including mathematics and the scientific method, perhaps the most important method of knowledge, that we do not reject but merely put in perspective - we can use the concept of analogy, and observe what all those informations and languages have in common. We might call such wider method, the linguistic method.

The linguistic method searches for 'common properties' in all Universal organisms, languages and minds constructed with those languages. It compares and extracts common formal laws from all spatial organisms, and temporal languages of communication. In this manner we advance a step deeper in our search of knowledge. This is what we did in this page and Theory of Organisms: to extract the basic laws and truths of bio-history and bio-economis, then proved constantly in our analysis of the data of history and economics from all perspectives [mathematical cycles, verbal theories, social facts, artistic forms, geographical tendencies, geological cycles, genetic processes, memetic processes, cycles of life and extinction of civilizations, evolutionary tendencies of machines, economical cycles, etc.]

All those linguistic approaches establish our analysis of economics and history, in a level of truthness, and usefulness to the human cells of the Historic organism, far superior to the present theories of history and economics applied by politicians and industrialists, even by University scholars [except a reduced group of serious 'scientists of history'] which do not even use the previous, lesser method of truth, the 'scientific method', but exist in the pre-Socratic age of knowledge - the mythic age. How can we expect then that our societies do not fail, die and massacre its cells without a minimal quantity of human goods and proper information, if those who rule us, use methods of knowledge proper of the bronze age [laws inspired in mosaic ethics, Go[l]d religions, constitutions crafted by slave owners, a cult to war based in racial nationalisms, previous to the verbal age, etc.]?

Those people forget that survival is a function of linguistic and informative dexterity. Indeed the purpose of languages and knowledge is to ensure the survival of the species which observes reality with that virtual world.

Species with better, more informative, faster languages=virtual worlds, who scan more the Universe, are survival species, whose virtual worlds are selected, since they kill less efficient species of virtual worlds. We talk of top predator languages=virtual worlds that create top predator species.

Such top predator linguistic species use simpler species, as food=energy, or as working tools of his relative kingdom - as man does with 'living property', or DNA with more simple carbohydrates, or ants with lesser insects.

Selection of species, is not only of external efficient bodies, but also of accurate information and objective minds hat determine a top predator organism, a survival organism.

The most complex languages make species like man survive other lesser thinking species such as lions. The capacity to understand the Laws of the Universe, its cycles, and predict them, and act in consequence determines the survival of species, from primitive humans that did not enter into lion caves, to modern nations that understand the cycles of war, caused by the uncontrolled reproduction of lethal goods. Yet today, social nations, human organisms have forgotten the social and survival laws of the Universe, and the purpose of truth. Today animetals and company-mothers under primitive ideologies of History and Economics drive the Human species towards extinction. The conclusion is obvious: either animetals evolve their ideologies of History and economics, and make them realistic, truthful to the laws of organic species, and Universal behavior, or they will become extinguished as a species.

You might wonder then: Why they don't do that. Why they don't evolve their ideologies in search of survival truths? Why they hold on so many myths about economics and history?

If we apply our definition of truth to the analysis of historic and economic ideologies we can understand easily why there are so many myths and false theories in those fields of knowledge.

- In first place verbal thought is a language that carries little information. So it is easy to manipulate and hide their truths. The verbal language is like seeing a beer in darkness since words talk about temporal things, often things that have happened in the past and we no longer see.

So it is easier to have misleading information, or little information, and hence to believe in wrong truths.

Moreover, people with power know this, so they tend to provide wrong information and hide information in order to control verbal, temporal truths. This is very useful, because we act according to the information we have. If we do not have information we do not act. If we do not see the bottle of beer, we will not ask the owner for a shot of beer... If we do not know that people invent money in the stock-market we will not ask for a fair share of that money as citizens of America... So historically there has been always a control of truths, by those in power, from the age of inquisitions, when the church controlled information, to the modern systems of control of information displayed by companies of mass-media attached to groups of power. Part of that strategy is to deny that truth exists in verbal thought. So people will not ask for truth and evidence, in verbal terms.

First, by becoming aware that verbal truths are progressively manipulated by groups of power.

Then by understanding that the manipulation of truth, is systematic, and based in a few 'tricks' that tend to become repetitive in societies.

Again we could put a visual example of such tricks. You can cheat on the colors of things, with a filter of colors, that transform them. However that crystal will transform those colors always in the same manner. You can diminish light on the scene, but light will be lost in all objects... Those visual tricks are known: We can light back the scene through computers, and put back the colors properly. Only when there is no information at all we cannot reconstruct the visual truth.

So happens with lies about History and economics, the two subjects about which most people in power lie to cater their selfish goals, regardless of the harm they cause to the nation.

- Those who lie tend to hold power, and have a self-interest in their lies. So they tend to hide the mechanisms of power they use to control the common people. They protect systems of power, sacrificing individuals even entire races, because systems of energy/information control social organisms.

- Those who lie deny the basic methods of truthness of the Universe. They do so denying the way the Universe 'causes' reality, through multiple causes. Instead myth makers create 'ceteris paribus', single causes to each Universal event; and/or use a single language to study History and Economics. They prefer mathematical languages that most people do not understand, and make humans abstract species. In this manner they can manipulate people without responsibility.

Further on since most social actions are performed by verbal speakers, who act through verbal thoughts, the use of mathematics hides the mechanisms of social power based in words. And vice versa, verbal explanations of monetary systems of power, hide the digital equations that control the economical behavior of company-mothers and other economical factors.

In the Universe, reality is based in the confluence of many causes, that create reality, and can be perceived with many languages. Specially social reality that takes place by the concerted actions of multiple actors, consumers, company-mothers, government, machines that influence human actions, etc.

- Those who lie tend to lie to favor their point of view, and hide what they did wrong; so they tend to lie specially about their fields of work and cultures.

- Those who lie tend to invent alternative ideas to cheat you, ideas that seem to make you prosper and happy, ideas called myths. In simple words, the myth is a lie, which substitutes the truth, with lies that make you happy... Myths take you for a sucker...

- To do so, the myth-makers try to lower your capacity to reason, expressing the myths in infantile, dramatic ways. They lower the logic content of the word, with all the methods explained above: single causes, provoking fear, using dogmas and religious postulates without prove, appealing to your heart, that cannot see, that has no lucidity and awareness, and can be cheated much easier with emotions. If they talk about temporal facts the main facts of history and economics for which verbal thought is superior they use images or mathematical statistics. So economics is based in images, and history has become illustrated by Hollywood films and photographs.

We could systematize all those logic ways of lying about the past, in a 'concept', the concept of fiction. The basic tool people in power use to cheat citizens... and provoke the extinction of social organisms.

Fiction: Organisms die in his third age when no longer follow the information of their nervous systems

The myth, fiction is any of the multiple, possible distorted mirrors of reality, we can create with words. Unlike the true-image, which is clear, and harmonic, which is self-evident, fiction is a distortion, able to cheat the believer, providing alternative ideas to the mind.

Fiction is not entertainment, but a fundamental sickness of any social organism, since it deactivates the capacity of the ruling network of the organism, the nervous/informative network to guide and cause survival actions in the cell of the organism. An organism that does not believe the informative messages of its social system, in the case of history the verbal messages of their social brain, is not a working organism. It is an easy prey of the environment, that no longer is serious about survival, and takes seriously his existence. Human organisms have always been ruled by serious people, who tried to make the organisms survive. It is only in the XX century, due to the massive degradation of verbal information caused by metal-minds, by TVs, radios, and other fictional machines, when our societies have abandoned reality, and no longer work as organisms, no longer accept verbal mandates, ethic mandates of survival.

This only means that our societies are entering the age of extinction, the third age of all organism, when the nervous/informative systems are no longer functioning properly. Such is indeed the meaning of death: social cells no longer obey the organic mind, the informative network of the society, which collapses. Then the individual social cells become disorganized and become preyed by other organisms who do believe their informative system. In the case of societies, human organisms re today disorganized by the sickness of fiction, of metal-minds, that only vomit false ideas about history and economics. This has a purpose: to make humans victims of company-mothers that reproduce machines and obey a new language of power, digital information, monetary networks that produce machines and evolve the ecosystem of machines and destroy the human ecosystem.

The chances of survival of History have diminished today as metal-minds destroy the capacity of words to be obeyed, to provoke actions, by creating a constant noise of verbal fiction. Indeed, fiction is the 'big brother' of modern days. By creating multiple fictional ideas, metal-minds, Hollywood, has invented the fundamental method of deactivation of human social organisms: the disbelief on human words. Today people cannot take seriously human orders, because for each non-fictional human orders, a horde of writers, novelists, film-makers, and singers, talk about useless concepts to life, distort reality, and have created finally a new type of human being, the neo-Paleolithic man, a primitive man, individualistic, without social compromise, that no longer believes in social, human orders.

Such subtle way in which machines of information and company-mothers who care only for machines, not for human beings, confuse the human mind has proved enormously effective. Today people do not become motivated by social, real problems. They prefer to see a fictional world, and that is indeed the meaning of the third age: as the extinction of an organism advances, the cells become disorganized, no longer obey the orders of the nervous system, cancers appear, cells change position, and no longer work together. The organism becomes disorganized because nervous orders no longer are believed by cells. In the muscles the slow and fast cells gather into two different groups, and the muscle does not work together. In the body the fat moves away and hangs around. The deformation of the structures of any social organisms is death. And death is the third age caused by the deactivation of the nervous system.

In history we talk of the Human baroque, when no longer men obey their biological language, no longer believe in words.

The world of fiction makes those actors and film makers, those journalists and politicians who have become slaves of metal-communicators, and indifferent to humans survival social truths, as guilty of our extinction, as weapons and robots will be.

They were the brain of mankind, and they have abandoned mankind and confused mankind with lies against our survival.

Against myths it is necessary to have the right amount of information, and to know the laws that rule the Organisms of the Universe. In this manner by adjusting information to the proved facts and models of reality, to the Laws of the Universe, we will know if that information is correct, or not.

Indeed. The laws, the truths that rule the Universe apply to all the events and species of that Universe. Why? Because as we said before, the laws of the Universe have only a penalty: death by extinction. Those who do not understand such laws, and act against them, become extinct. And then their false truths and actions disappear. They are not. And things which are not are not truth.

In that sense the only truth which is absolute is the law of existence, a law that also applies to languages and truths.

An organic system which is ill-designed, is not efficient and it will become extinct by the many sickness that affect ill-designed organisms. In history by revolution, by war, or conquered by a better designed social nation.

So only organisms who are efficient, whose brain-systems of information and truth, are correct, last.

Otherwise they will not exist and the ideological lies that guided the information and acts of the society will cease to exist.

In this web site, all statements we make are based in those bio-logical methods that set the quantity of truth of a linguistic statement:

- We have researched and provided enough accurate, objective information about the facts of History and economics. Since we have no vested interests in those subjects, except our interest in the survival of man, nor we represent any organization of power of any kind, we can provide that truth without myths and hidden agendas.

- Regarding the nature of social truths, we adopt always whenever it is needed to consider and/or qualify the actions of historic and economic agents over reality, the biological method: the point of view of survival of man is the truth about any event or action required in history and economics.

- In the books on Bio-History and Bio-Economics we consider truths that can be validated by all the languages of man, applying in this manner the linguistic method: We consider verbal data, cyclical data expressed in mathematical languages, and further on, within the natural language of man - verbal thought - we consider theories and models that are validated at the same time by Theory of Evolution, Theory of Organisms, archeological and historical data, and the traditional sciences of verbal knowledge that mankind believed in the past, sociology, and the natural laws of social evolution and human survival spelt by religions and ethics.

- In the analysis of the causes of historic facts, we use multiple causes, that intersect creating reality both in time [cyclical nature of the causes] and space [multiple causes that flux in the point of the event]. Hence we consider a model of multiple cyclical causes that shape the great facts of history: financial cycles, cycles of evolution, reproduction and consume of products, political cycles, and cultural cycles. Given the difficulty of an entire description of all those cycles in a simultaneous manner, we have written 3 different books that show exhaustively all those causes. Each book quotes the different cyclical causes of the facts of history and economics, analyzes one of the 3 main factors that cause reality, in depth. In 'Bio-economics' and 'The evolution of machines', we study in depth the economical causes of reality [financial, product, consume cycles]. In "bio-History, the ages of man", we highlight the human causes of reality, [cultural, geographical, historic, and political causes of Historic events]. In "Art, the evolution of languages" we consider the cultural, and linguistic causes of the history of man and technology.