THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DEMOCRACIES AND FREE MARKETS.
The Real Citizens of Market Democracies are companies not human beings. So sometimes what people want and what companies want is not the same. Since, in spite of the motto of a Republican War minister, ‘What is good for General Motors is good for (my) America’, most Americans and Human beings want peace and carbon-life goods that bring happiness to the humankind.

 

 

 

The economic ecosystem is a dual network, the so-called Free Market Democracy, in which laws rule human beings as ‘zoon politikons’ and money rules them as workers that exchange their life time for a wage and as consumers guided subconsciously by the prices and values established by money that makes ‘expensive things’ more desirable and valuable than cheap ones. Yet, as it happens in the Universe where dark, invisible, gravitational information rules visible light, in a Free Market democracy, invisible money rules the legal, political system and controls most of the life of human beings. So humans instead of developing their natural free will, increasing their human verbal information, natural food-energy, sexual reproduction, free time and social evolution, today spend most of their lives working=reproducing machines and consuming=testing their quality, instead of enjoying their free will. So the big question about our societies is: How men have become so deeply influenced by the economic ecosystem as to abandon their natural will and spend most of their time working in companies or testing machines, if we are supposed to live in democratic societies, ruled by ethic laws and Constitutions that protect and enhance our free will? The answer is: Because we don’t live in Human Democracies, but in Free Markets, which are not democracies of human beings but democracies of companies. But human beings and companies are not the same species. Indeed, in pure Market Democracies, like America or XIX C. Europe, (origin of most machines of history), the ‘legal persons’ with more power and rights are not men neither governments, but companies and their owners, who have 2 privileges proper of ‘aristocratic societies’: The exclusive right to invent the language of power, paper-money, in stock-markets; and no legal responsibility by their actions, as the Law of Anonymous societies protect its owners. While men have legal responsibility and no rights to invent money. Yet to understand how companies achieved those privileges we have to trace the historic birth of Free Market ‘democracies’.

4. Birth of Free Market Democracies and companies. Holland and England.
In the ancient times, Indo-European tribes, discoverers of most weapons and Semite cultures discoverers of most forms of Gold invented and expanded worldwide the economic ecosystem, imposing its castes through weapons and gold values (war and slavery). During the Middle Ages, Gold castes were submitted to the power of the Wor(l)d churches of Islam and Christianity and their power dwindled. But at the end of the Middle Ages, during the gunpowder discontinuum, when the church collapsed, the multiplication of weapons and money increased the power of those cultures. And both reached again a higher degree of organization, ‘transcending’ from the individual herd to the organic system. So warrior hordes became political entities called aristocratic kingdoms. In Europe those warrior kingdoms overpowered the Pope and 'invented' nations, according to the territory of preying of each horde of warriors. The Frank hordes became France, the German Hordes, Germany and so on. Thus today animetals are no longer hordes of loose individuals; neither they belong to cultures based on human ethic laws, like Europe was in the Middle Ages, unified by the common verbal wor(l)d of the Christian religion, but they have created nations with E-armies and T-currencies, the quantic elements that define them as economic ecosystems.
Meanwhile bankers created economic organisms called company-mothers that reproduced professionally machines of war, first gunboats and then a growing variety of organic machines of energy and information. Soon those national hordes of aristocratic warriors relied on companies of weapons to sustain themselves in power. So with the Industrial R=evolution the new alliance between old warrior aristocracies and 'stockrats', owners of Companies, became the backbone of economical nations. 'Stockrats',  were owners of stock companies, which controlled the reproduction of machines, money and weapons and through salaries, bribes and prices, controlled the citizens and politicians of European nations. In Holland, the inventor of modern democracies, M.P. members were mostly members of Voc, the first company, and England required a minimal monetary wealth to its MP members that could only be gathered by shareholders or aristocrats. While voters were required a minimal rent, since ‘democracy’ was supposed to be the rule of Go(l)d over society, according to Jewish-Protestant religious myths, not the rule of society over Go(l)d. When the systems of mass-media propaganda evolved and national armies required citizens to become soldiers and give for free their lives to the ‘cycle of economic wars’, voting spread. So during Independence wars or world wars, in exchange for military service, countries let common citizens vote ‘interposed politicians’ who played a double moral, promising voters one thing and ‘investors’ another. The few R=evolutionary democracies (French R=evolution, Spanish R=evolution, Weimar R=evolution) that tried to create real democratic states were soon attacked by Free Market democracies that overturned them, choking their economies (so the Weimar republic collapsed, for lack of financial credit) or defeated them in wars (so the Spanish R=evolution was overturned by the combined financial aid to Franco, given by the British who sold him oil and the Germans who sold him weapons), or transformed them in dictatorships, since to win those wars they had to put their r=evolutionary governments in the hands of military dictators (Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin).
So we talk in fact of Free Market Democracies as the most recent version of an animetal government ruled by a privilege caste of Go(l)d bankers and warriors, the owners of companies, who control all the languages of social power, including information about democracies, presented as the best and most free political system, so ‘democratic believers’ don’t r=evolve against them.
Everything started in Leyden. The Dutch were at war with Spain. The city was under siege. But the pirates and gunboats of the first company broke the dikes, flooded the land and killed the Spaniards. Never mind they also killed the common people. It was national hysteria at its best. And the ship owners took over. On the wake of its victory at Leyden, in 1576 they gave a coup in Amsterdam. An oligarchy of 10 ship owners imposed political control over the press and the parliament and promoted Calvinist go(l)d religions that favoured their industrial goals of profits. They invented the first company, VOC and put the entire country to manufacture gunboats with the excuse of the war. When the war ended, they kept manufacturing gunboats and used them in slave traffic, selling weapons to all other European nations. Thus it was not Democracy what fostered capitalism due to the freedom it provided to its citizens, as many A-Historians believe, but Companies invented Free Market Democracies, as a dual system of power, in which the ‘black hole’ of history, money, ruled the political system, which in turn allowed companies to make profits, print money and sell weapons, promoting war. In Holland, after the company took over, the parliament lost the right to issue money and control the expenditures of the government, as they could do in the Middle Ages. Those privileges were transferred to the agents of the company. The owners of the 1st and subsequent Companies were mainly Calvinist and Jewish financiers. They formed the Herren XVII, the first boardroom, and the first CEO was called Cohen, the surname of the descendants of Aaron. We have also a letter to the company’s governor of New York, then called New Amsterdam, which recommended accepting Jewish emigrants as they are ‘among the biggest shareholders of the company’. It was indeed, the beginning of a Jewish-Calvinist alliance of money that still controls the world capital with majority in the Earth inc.; and imposes its go(l)d ideology that now would be called ‘capitalism’. The company started thereafter to print free money in the stock market, and it dissuaded the Dutch and the people’s government to invest in those shares. To pay back interests it became specialized in the sale of weapons and slaves. Since the sale of human lives was big business, as they cost nothing and so profits were high. While weapons were very expensive and so profits were also maximized selling them in war; according to the syntactic equation of profits:
 Maximum sales value (weapons) – Minimal cost (slaves) = maximum benefit (slavery, war)
Which is an equation different from the syntax of ethic words that rules democracies which is:
Man (temporal subject)>Verb(action , law, ethic mandate)>Object (energy).
That is, man in legal and ethic terms is always superior to the object, its energy and cannot be treated legally as such. Yet the ‘economic law’ of profits that rules Free Markets has embedded the values of money and its anti-ethic digital languages within it. So to get higher go(l)d profits and attract people to invest in those companies, making weapons and slaves, the 2 old occupations and warriors and Go(l)d bankers, became now the fundamental occupations of the 1st companies. Money changed both its nature and the way it was invested. When the church controlled money she invested 50% by canonical law on the poor and the rest went often on art and human goods. So they created Renaissance Italy, a place full of beauty, where men were the measure of all things. Now, because money was a piece of a company that manufactured weapons, money became 2 times eviL, a credit to make more weapons, used to enslave people, spread war and exterminate life species. So Jewish-Calvinist companies created South-Africa, colonial Empires, New York and slave plantations. They were as eviL as any warrior empire has been. Yet unlike Nazis who kept a detailed record of their massacres, companies hide their actions. For example, the 1st British company, the Indian company arrived to Bengal in the XVIII century and forbade rice farms, obliging to farm tea. 15 million Bengalis died of hunger within a decade. It was a Holocaust that doesn’t appear in the books of history. There is only an internal memorandum within the company, ‘congratulating’ the director of the Bengal factory for the benefits obtained in the tea market of London that year, and advising that if the supply of farmers dwindled, the system could be moved to Malaysia. Pharmaceutical companies today manipulate prices, forbid generics, (cheap medicines), do not research 3rd world sickness because they are not profitable and hence are responsible for the chaotic state of World health that causes those 7 million children’s deaths per year. And yet most people believe they are ‘good companies’ that help mankind. But the action -reaction law always ends up delivering its own type of cruel justice. The turning point was the 30 years war fuelled by weapons trade as Dutch companies fed the armies of both sides of the war. 1/3rd of the German people died in that war. So when the rest of Europe was fed up with Holland, its gunboats, and its war companies, Louis the XIV, the French king invaded them. But the stockholders of the company did not want to risk its wealth, defending the nation, and so as they always do, bankers abandoned the Dutch trading, middle class people to their own fate. They took the money and run to Great Britain, paying over 10 million guilders, distributed among its MP members, who chose William II, king of England. Those shareholders, who put the king in power demanded total privileges for Companies and bankers. So the privileges people should have in a real democracy but the company had taken away from their parliament in Holland, were not taken away from the British people: free credit rights, and free rights to punish the transgressors of the law. So the owners of companies became anonymous. They could not be judged, but could print speculative money stock-markets, while the government had to tax citizens to get his share of the financial pie. So the Dutch king, William, came to London with the company's stockholders, his gunboats, and the Amsterdam Bank’s gold, founding the English Stock market and the Bank of England. The City was a state within the English state, with its own laws, and an absolute monopoly on financial matters. Not even the English king could enter in The City without asking permission to its stockowners. And of course only the rich could vote in elections to the company-controlled parliament. Universal suffrage came only after World War I because companies needed free soldiers to test their weapons. They couldn't afford to pay such massive mercenary armies. So they convinced people to die for the state, on exchange for putting a small paper on the ballot box. But the press had become a very sophisticated system of political propaganda. So r=evolution never happened and the people sheepishly voted to their owners. And ever since we call that a Democracy, ‘the power of the people’. But people cannot judge politicians, when they systematically lie on their promises. Politicians never obey the will of citizens, neither they can change the credit privileges of stock markets. Constitutions are precisely there to prevent them from changing the laws that hold together the dictatorships of democracies. Since the masters of politicians are the owners of the company, the stockrats, the new aristocracy. In the ancient regime, aristocrats owned the world, and used their tools of power, weapons directly. So they killed you if you did not obey. And only aristocratic courts could judge them. Today stockrats invent the new language of power, money, which manufactures weapons, and so they use both together, weapons and money to control governments, armies and police systems, bribing them.
Thus nations became, departing from Holland and England, where the Industrial R=evolution took off for the first time, Free Market Democracies lead by companies. Today companies gave most of the monetary orders that guided the quantic actions of its citizens during most of his life time, either as reproducers=workers or consumers=testers of their machines. Those citizens however believe to be free, because in the Non-AE Universe all is perception and perception is relative to the information we have. So as long as ‘stockrats’, are able to mask their control of the 3 languages of power of societies, money, weapons and the law, through interposed politicians and convince citizens with mass-media propaganda (the press and TV media their companies control) that they are free because they put a paper-vote in a ballot, once every 4 years, citizens will believe in their freedom. Even if they have no control or rights to re=produce paper-money, the language of social power in economic ecosystems, controlled by those companies, which are the true ‘citizens’ of a free Market, with multiple rights human citizens lack. In the Non-AE Universe the way power perpetuates itself, from black holes to financial masters, is hiding power from those under control.
America started as a free Theocratic society, founded by the Pilgrim Fathers, which soon became dominated by gunboat companies and slavery. Then after the Independence War the lawyers of New England companies came out with a sheer concept: the democratization of Evil. That is, the evil behavior of English Companies won’t be abolished, but now any American could create a Free Market Company and control humans through prices. This concept of Freed=freedom of Greed still prevails in America. Yet obviously someone has to be exploited under the syntax of money that made men and machines objects valued by companies. That is why in earlier America slaves couldn’t not be freed, because they were the energy of companies; and latter workers became part-time slaves without any social right, and now the entire globalized world is preyed by globalized corporations, once the ‘American Free Market democracy’ has become the global model followed by all nations. So the American model of a Free Market democracy, which could seem at first, more positive for people than the close-knit of British Go(l)d castes, paradoxically has increased the speed of extinction of life due to the expansion of the rule of money to all the people, which now believe in ‘corporations’ and money values as the 2 pillars of the American civilization:
‘The politics of America are the business of America’ resumes indeed the essence of that culture.
Further on, when companies diversified its products and learnt also to reproduce peaceful machines not only weapons, according to the 2 arrows of the Universe, the state of permanent war developed by the first companies, which were all gunboat companies, was ‘softened’ by the dual cycles of peaceful machines and war machines of the modern industrial age , with its cyclical ages of world wars and peaceful consume latter studied , while slavery softened with the buying of part-time slaves, workers that sold their part-time for money. Yet the essence of the old warrior and go(l)d cultures which was to use men as objects and value machines=weapons more than any other human object, has remained in the modern world ruled by companies.
In that sense, Anglo-Saxon bicephalic democracies were just a mild improvement over the 1st age of democracies, when companies ‘owned’ entire nations like India or the US and were represented in the Parliament by a single ‘war party’, as they only manufactured weapons and war parties meant big business for them. In Holland it was the Orange party. In England the Tories played that role. Then when companies started to manufacture also peaceful machines and/or make money with ‘Free Trade’, a milder Whig Party represented those stockholders that wanted to trade. And so bicephalic democracies were born. It was only during wars and R=evolutions, or due to the brutal labour conditions imposed by those companies, when people organized themselves into parties and became a force in parliaments. Yet when a system is rotten from the beginning, protected by constitutions that limit the rights of social governments, it is very difficult to change it. So even when one of the 2 company’s parties was substituted by a party that truly catered to the mass of citizens (like the Labour party in England), since companies were awash with money they finally corrupted back the people’s party and through propaganda, brain-washed the people to vote for companies’ party. The hypocrisy of money and its invisible orders have been ever since part of the ‘democratic game’. Again, the key element of political corruption is the exclusive rights to issue money in stock-markets that company have always had in Free Markets Democracies, except in the short Keynesian period after II W.W. when people understood that the finality of those rights is to financed a massive reproduction of weapons, the most expensive and profitable goods of the market, which ends invariably in the massacre of millions of human beings.

5. Social Darwinism and scientific racism, the ideology of A-Economics and Free Markets.
Today America and most human cultures are in biological terms ‘economic ecosystems’ whose only purpose is to reproduce more machines and weapons increasing the economical power of its ruling castes. In those countries historic networks, based in words and natural food, are submissive to machine networks, based in money and machine’s energy; ruled by ‘animetal ideologies’ and hierarchical castes that do not regard the rest of men as equals, since they believe to be superior due to its ‘external added’ energy power (given by weapons, made of energetic metal such as iron) or its informative power (given by a soft informative metal such as gold). So they believe in ‘unfair competence’ and apply Darwinian behaviour to the rest of human beings, with their added power, considering the poor, inferior species, because they lack their technological power.
In that regard, Social Darwinism, the ‘anti-truth’ of Darwinian laws of behaviour that encourage the solidarity between similar species was perfectly expressed by Carnegie, the steel master when he affirmed that, ‘While the law of competition may sometimes be hard for the individual, it is best for the race because it ensures the survival of the fittest in every area. We accept and welcome, therefore, as conditions to which we must accommodate ourselves, great inequality of environment, the concentration of business, industrial and commercial, in the hands of a few, and the law of competition between these, as being not only beneficial but essential for the futureprogress of the race’. It is all true, yet economists, scientists and industrialists are missing the point: evolution of which race, Mr. Carnegie, the human or the metal race?
The previous sentence today has become the backbone of ‘A-economics’. Yet is an ugly thing to say, so rhetorics disguise the concept under an abstract term: productivity. So economists advice every government and company to increase the competence between machines and human workers increasing their ‘productivity’, that is diminishing the quantity of labour, so when they fire workers and put in their places robots, a diminishing number of workers seem to ‘produce’ more. Obviously the worker is not producing more, the robots of the company are ‘increasing the productivity’. But people are so naïve that they think workers are becoming more efficient. In fact, what Social Darwinism has created is a world in which human beings and machines compete under the digital equation of productivity, yet another version of the syntax of money: Man=Price=Salary<Machine =cost. Which means that as machines evolve and become cheaper than human beings, men become obsolete. Yet since men no longer evolve, we will all become obsolete in the future. Further on, since machines are mainly used to construct other machines, by the law of affinity human beings are fighting in unfair conditions, while money is invested also by the law of affinity to evolve that metal-race to which people like Mr. Carnegie, our CEOs and companies, dedicate their life.