"We are moving from a peaceful, mindless society to a security state controlled by big brother Matrix"

Evolution of lethal goods require new approaches to control them

Besides the Paradox of History, the second fundamental cause of Historic events are the evolutionary tendencies of the economic ecosystem towards the production of better, cheaper, machines. In the present free economic ecosystems in which lethal machines are free to evolve and reproduce, there is a natural tendency towards easier, more lethal Weapons, also easier to buy, as monetary corruption break all 'nationalistic barriers' to the free trade of military secrets. Those weapons, we forecast a decade ago, would cause Global Terrorism, with a capacity to destroy human lives, similar to the power enjoyed by organized industrial nations in the past. The WTC attack is exactly the first episode of that tendency that will convert individual groups into armies as powerful as national armies.

A terrorist with an atomic weapon can kill more Americans that all other previous wars combined. Unfortunately our ideological myths about science, prevent us from confronting those problems, since our free economic ecosystem gives today total freedom of production of lethal goods to Company-mothers. Indeed, machines are always good, lethal weapons always help the defense of our countries, we have to keep evolving them... Why? The answer is again profits, the westerner god to which all rationality bends, as Islam bends to the will of Koran... Money indeed prevents the Western world to make the right decisions respect to his own security, and obviously respect to the right policies for the Third world.

Military research is a great business. So if we have to build nano-robotics, bacteriological weapons, small Atomic bombs - never mind someone might buy them and throw them over our Heads - we will do it.

It is then absolutely necessary to control lethal weapons, and correct the myths of nationalism, economics and science, that prevent us from controlling those Weapons.

The economic ecosystem is fundamental to understand this crisis, which happens precisely now, when the economic evolution of lethal machines, have reached an economic threshold that makes them available to anyone with a few million dollars. While the degree of economical injustice caused by globalization, is such, that 'terrorists' like Mr. Bin Laden can easily recruit guerrillas for his warfare plans, among the millions of dispossessed.

Unfortunately the West has not modified his vision of Third World guerrillas and fundamentalist movements, labeled as 'terrorist groups' and primitive cultures. So the present warfare state will continue, because all dialog will be excluded... Fact is that Religious cultures deserve some respect from the West, given the fact that scientific progress is far more lethal than Neolithic Religions. Indeed, the lethal future towards which the West walks due to the evolution of Robotic Machines those cultures reject, means perhaps the Third World has some reason in their arguments against massive industrialization at all costs. While Third World Terrorism is obviously a form of warfare, as evil as all forms of warfare, but in the same level that State Terrorism, such as that practiced by Russia and America during the Cold war, or the present robotic, atomic and bacteriological research of weapons in NATO Labs... So it is absurd to deny all dialog with the other side of the paradox of History engaged in the Semite wars... specially when atomic terrorism, probably can provoke millions of victims in the West.

The fact that those negative cycles of bio-history, caused by the fundamental 'germs' of economics (uncontrolled evolution of weapons, violent mass-medial and monetary speculation) and History (social injustice, racist and violent ideologies of history, corrupted religions converted in military inquisitions), were not controlled on time, are now very bad good news for mankind... The lack of an objective, scientific vision of History, and the dismissal of diplomatic organisms such as UNO to solve global problems, means that now we enter as we advanced in our Summer issue, a new age of militarism and economic imperialism, against the freedom of Western citizens, and the life of Third World citizens, both of which will suffer the consequences of this Globalization of the Semite wars. It is the end of an era, and the beginning of a worse one...

Cheap lethal goods: From Huxley to Orwell.

A decade ago in our first books on bio-economics, as the present trend of globalization, fundamentalism, scientific racism, and evolution of weapons, became self-evident, we forecast that with the new millennium we would move from a society similar to the "New brave World" of Huxley - a happy world of ignorant people - into the catastrophic reality of "1984" - a police state in which terrorists, colonial guerrillas, and rebels against the Western civilization would all be put in the same bag, and become controlled, by Big brother Technology. While our economic ecosystem, would deviate all resources from production of human goods to the new technological species of robotics and security computers...

It was easy to forecast that shift of history, in as much as history was no longer ruled in the west by human laws, but by lobbyism, and Company-mothers, that will accept even promote the evolution of lethal technologies. So once we understood the evolution of technology, and the dual use of machines, for peaceful and military purposes, it was obvious that as technology became more lethal, and computers exhausted their civil uses, lobbyism and terrorism, violent mass-media, and social injustice would also come together into the nightmare of a military, police use of information technology.

This is exactly what the World trade massacre means: from now on security Technology, and big brother Matrix, have a justification: terrorism. The mass terrified by the skillful images of mass-media, will soon accept the security state against that 'word where all rebels can be put in' called 'terrorism'. So if a terrorist which is Muslim throws a bomb, all Muslims can be controlled. If a terrorist which is ecological throws a bomb, all ecologists can be controlled. If an Afghan throws a bomb, all Afghans can be massacred... If it happens to be poor and alien, all immigrants can be blamed. Of course this is a slow process, as all processes of control, which starts with just laws, with a just cause -the WTC massacre- and then those laws are used for other goals.

From dialog to violence. Right and wrong approaches to Islam.

Our example is clear: This magazine has been interfered in the last month by government agencies, busted twice, our e-mail interfered... When we never, ever have done any apology of terrorism, or violence... but dedicated all our efforts to fight violence as a means that goes against social dialog, without denying the clear injustices of the First World against the Third world, of the West against the South, of the Economic ecosystem, against the historic cultures of the past. Precisely what this new 'terrorism' means is the end of dialog, that could solve the problems of the world and the beginning of a new period of violence, in which the First world, the West, the Economic ecosystem, will feel justified to control further the Third world, with the excuse of terrorism.

On one side those who try to prevent by peaceful means the collapse of nature and the human ecosystem, are silenced as the violents take over.

Nobody now cares anymore about the peaceful Globalization demonstrations of the past months that were putting on the table the great themes of injustice mentioned above. Now it is all news about terrorism. So the Third world now is no longer the victim, but the predator, the massacred world, but the cause of the massacre. Bin Laden indeed has done a weak favor to the Third world. It has given the best excuse to the first world to create an Orwellian nightmare. On one side the rich, justified to control the poor because they are terrorists. On the other side billions of suffering people among which a few hundred put bombs..

. Indeed, very few millions back Fundamentalism in Islam, probably a smaller percentage that those who back Fundamentalism in Israel, or those who back 'Technological Fundamentalism and Economical Racism' in the west. And yet we do not bomb Israel, for those policies, or Northern Ireland... The military, cheap solution to Third World country problems is indeed a clear regression in History to XIX century colonial policies, against a desperado culture of endemic poverty.

It has to be clear than in a scientific model of History, there is a right and a wrong way to rule mankind. The right way is that which favors human goods, ethonomic systems, human rights, and Social evolution - the traditional goals of the UNO. It is what the poor nations of the third world desire. The wrong way is militarism, the bombing of Third World nations, an a biased economical ecosystem that rejects the goods of the Third World, and prevents any credit for those goods in International stock markets - the Western way.

So in other words, the Third World is right, UNO is right. To cover that evident righteousness, the West exaggerates the dangers of Third World terrorism, with massive ideological mass-media propaganda that portraits the violent minorities of Fundamentalist Islam, as the center of that civilization. To qualify Islam or the Palestines as a Terrorist state, as Israel has done, avoids to solve peacefully with 'infinite justice' the problems of that 99% of non-violent Islamic people suffering global misery.

We talk of two clear different approaches to Islam in the First World:

- That of Israel and America, which follows Israel policies under the pressure of the Jewish-American Lobby, and considers the Islamic world a barbarous culture, of natural enemies, that can be massacred. It is a cynical approach based in the colonial needs of Israel, and the needs of the Military industry that profits enormously with recurrent wars, such as the Iraq war, and now the Afghan war. - And the UNO and EU concept that all civilizations deserve respect, and Islam should be helped to evolve and improve their citizen's life, as the necessary step to uproot endemic violence. It is the right culture, unfortunately cast aside in this crisis as the overwhelming power of mass-media controlled by Jewish-American interests, sides with the hard nose policies of military lobbyism.

Today 90% of people back the hard nose wrong policy that will bring further violence, and finally sooner or latter cause Atomic terrorism and the Orwellian nightmare.

Of course to understand those facts, and the right of Islam to exist as an agricultural, religious civilization, you have to change 'your chip' and open your understanding of the traps and myths of the western culture, the Myths of science, the Myths of democracies, the myths of economics... A shocking path that we advice you to follow reading our references on those subjects. And vice versa, you have to 'change your chip' about the Third World and understand the true nature of the Organisms of History, of Love religions, of the Future...

Unfortunately the truth does not manifest itself without a clear intelligence and critical capacity to understand the ideologies we receive in the western world, in which our perception of reality is biased, and molded by mass-media systems, always in favor of machines, of technology, of science, of digital languages...

Perception is subjective, and perception causes our sense of truth. So those who direct the economic ecosystem with numbers and science have a positive, biased vision of the western economic ecosystem, and a negative, subjective vision of the Third world.

And vice versa, those who belong to the last verbal ecosystems of mankind - Islam, Christianism, Social Europe - have also a negative vision of the Economic ecosystem, and its lethal products, and a positive vision of Human ethics, Social evolution, Human goods...

Since both ecosystems, the economic ecosystems of machines, money and workers, and the historic ecosystems of human beings, verbal laws, and believers, are opposed, the subjective information and perception that the citizens of each system, have of the other, is also opposed.

The result is the increasing hate and opposition of both type of cultures.

Yet as long as violence did not rule the relationship between both ecosystems, in as much as ultimately both were made by human beings, a compromise, a dialog, a certain degree of reform, to create a better world based in the will of man and the production of human goods, to bring out of misery the Third world could be reached.

This is what the WTC has changed. The selfish, simple, militaristic, colonial approach to the Third world and his illness, proper of 'neofascism', now is validated. When our neofascist leaders, Berlusconi, Bush, Sharon, were chosen the past year, people realized of their nature. Anti-globalization movements became paramount, explaining those dangers. The ozone layer, the death of nature, the spread of poverty, state terrorism, and big brother were all feared. Opposition was mounting. Now with the World trade massacre, neofascism becomes validated...

That is indeed the second great tragedy of the WTC massacre, after the death of thousands of people... When a Jewish-American liberal artist like Woody Allen affirms that he backs Mr. Bush policies, after the WTC massacre, you can imagine the enthusiasm of all other groups... Even if Mr. Bush policies, have so far been moderate, what frightens us is what is not being done. Indeed, there has not been a single mention to the ultimate causes of the massive unrest of the Third world - the globalization process. It is better to consider the concept of terrorism, and create a "Terrorized citizenship" through the skillful use of mass-media to allow the a priori conditions needed to establish a Big Brother Matrix world...

In this manner the confuse idea of a Third World terrorism appears handy to spread the structure of control that our 'State terrorism', our neofascist governments manipulated by military lobbyism, will use in the future, to control the common citizens, displaced by Robotic workers, made obsolete, and entering a similar desperado situation to that of Islamic poor...

Military Lobbyism Vs Third World Terrorism.

The new American and Israeli governments, are basically two militaristic governments, in which neofascist politicians such as Sharon, or the team who made Desert Storm (Powell, Chenney, Bush Jr. greatly influenced by his father policies), have taken power. They are governments without capacity to dialog about the great problems of the world, but with an enormous capacity to repress opinions and people opposed to their wrong economical and political policies. This was quite evident before the WTC massacre. The opposition to Bush and Sharon was overwhelming in the world... Yet Mr. Sharon is also a shrewd politician. He probably knew a fact of bio-history. Once a war starts, nobody remembers who started it, but the world divides in two groups, and war continues. When Mr. Sharon entered the Explanade he probably thought on that. It was only needed on the other side, an attack of the magnitude of the WTC.

The WTC attack comes in handy for the usual wrong policies.

In front of that tragedy, the American government could have taken different measures. The logic, established by other Terrorist attacks, is to down play the attack, not to make it a 'victory' of the terrorists.

Instead it has been multiplied in its effects by violent-mass media, and it has become the 'necessary excuse' for war and militaristic lobbyism. In democracies, most citizens are peaceful individuals and have to be 'guided' into war, with an external excuse. In the past, in similar historic ages, that excuse was 'manufactured' by our cynical political milieu. So Mr. Saddam was not dissuaded by the American ambassador, and thinking erroneously he had the backing of America, he invaded Kuwait. In the past, a strong economical boycott brought Japan into war; and a self-provoked accident brought Spain to war (the Maine).

So instead of declaring war to Spain, the Maine was blown in Havana. Instead of preventing the known-in-advance attack to Pearl Harbor, Japan was encouraged... A few years ago the Chinese Embassy was bombed, Taiwan surrounded by airships, and spy planes sent to provoke war (see Summer issue). Yet China did not engage itself in war. So who was going to be the enemy? Iraq had been provoked in excess... However the West knows Islam is easily provoked, as their violent warrior culture feeds hate against the injustice of the First World towards their countries.

Now Islam has come to a date with eviL=Anti-live, and Mr. Bin Laden has created this new splendid little war, in which new weapons are tested, new missiles are spent, and lobbies and politicians make huge business.

The emotional shock cannot hide the objective analysis.

The aim of bio-history is to understand the paradox of history, the opposition between human and machine ecosystems, and find through verbal logic, and scientific history, a middle term between economic and historic ecosystems that could reform the World ecosystem for the betterment of all men.

If dialog was not possible we forecast that Orwellian nightmare... If human knowledge about economic and historic ecosystems did not progress, if the verbal sciences of history&religion&politics and the digital sciences of economics&production did not change, then the subjectivity of both kind of civilizations and languages of perception of the universe would bring a clash of predictable consequences between the First World, indifferent to the suffering of the majority of our species, living in the Third world, and the terrorist minority.

The emotional shock that the WTC massacre has caused to the World and this writer is difficult to measure. Even if we forecast 'Global Terrorism'='low intensity global warfare' as a natural consequence of the diminishing costs of lethal technologies, the increasing load of violence, carried by mass-media information, the massive injustice caused by globalization, and the birth of neofascism. Suddenly after a decade of writing on bio-historical themes, trying to spread a scientific model of history, and provide tools to cure the organic sickness of civilizations, the most negative cycles of bio-economics and bio-history, prove themselves. Since neither the financial crisis of 2001, or the advance of global terrorism and its counterpart, neofascism (state terrorism) have been prevented by peaceful, rational, ethic means, now an age of violence, and subjectivism in history starts...

The necessary elimination of Bin Laden will not eliminate the structural problems of Islam and the Third World, and so new Bin Ladens will appear, and lethal products will decrease prize (bacteriological, nano-robotics and small atomic devices) and new murderous attacks to the western world will take place. The response will be a Big Brother state with his repressive systems of control of information, that will take over, in an invisible, subtle manner, as it has taken over Israel in the past decades.

Indeed, between the two ways of understanding of the Third World, the European, UNO, humanist way, and the Jewish-American colonial way, the primitive Israel view backed by the American military Lobby it controls, has won the game. It implies the creation of an Israel-like military society in America, and perhaps soon in Europe.

The Israelification of the West are not good news for the European culture, and our way of life as citizens of America and Europe. We will be controlled in our bank accounts, recognized by the form of our iris, our words on the net will be monitored by echelon... We will be observed without realizing. Punishment will not stop in the guilty terrorists of the Afghan fundamentalist state, but Bin Laden will become the excuse to curtail even more the rights to inform, to explain, to analyze in a scientific, objective manner, for the good of mankind, the many sickness of our economic and political ecosystems, the civilization of machines and money we have built, and their lethal long-term consequences.

It is then clear that the WTC attack will not open a worldwide argument on the foundations of History&Politics&religion, and economics&science.

Education on the true meaning of those sciences and ecosystems, ill-defined, ill-directed, is essential to humanity. For that reason even if we have been very critical to our present economic ecosystem, and the lethal consequences of technology to mankind, we have always fought for dialog.

Yet it is clear that in the present information-controlled society, where false dogmas about economics, science, the meaning of democracies and religion, rule supreme, dialog is not possible. The imposition of a wrong globalization, a wrong economic ecosystem, a wrong ethics and scientific analysis of reality to the entire mankind, logically offers resistance. Now that imposition will be even greater, and the repression of those who only want to have a dialog, to improve our understanding of the human Universe, will increase.

What is then the meaning of talking the 'truth' about history and economics, when our information is limited by the systems of distribution, monitored by echelon, denied by mass-media outlets, soon controlled by the new 'terrorist legislation' that will fear any critique of the system?

The small group of economists and Historians who work in this magazine, "Future" have wonder this months about the purpose of truth in a world in which men cannot stand any longer the truth, that does not fit their self-interests. We've been tempted to abandon "Future", probably one of the few magazines today, that understands what lies aHead in the economic ecosystem, without that silly anthropocentric, arrogant optimism of our scholars, that believe machines are products of our mind, not natural evolving metal-species. And yet, a lonely endeavor side by side with a few other efforts such as Le Monde Diplomatique, in a world awash with falsities, and self-serving ideologies of human arrogance. For a decade we fought those scholars. Now we start to feel the authorized, false dogmas of pro-machine economics and violent history have won the battle, and so man has lost his war for survival, for a better world, for a world ruled by laws in favor of man. Perhaps we do not deserve survival. The Universe has certain minimal standards, mainly of ethic, biological nature, of behavior... to allow the survival of species. And man is jumping over all of them. As new menaces (bacteriological, Atomic terrorism) become real, we will enter in the baroque world of an Orwellian planet, without human freedom, in which machines will move freely between nations, planes will be robotized to avoid human and terrorist pilots, while men will be scanned, tagged, controlled, and limited in their movements, as possible terrorists, just because they are poor and belong to a Third world nation... We enter in a world without dialog, a world not worth to live.