4. THE WTC ATTACK AND ITS CAUSES:
EXPANSION OF THE SEMITE WARS TO AMERICA.

The WTC attack means the expansion of the Israel-Palestine conflict to the mother cultures of America and Islam

A Jewish conflict becomes an American conflict.

The World Trade Attack now has made possible what was desired by the American Militaristic new government... Another profitable war to keep feeding the sickness of the American political and economical system - lobbyism, and the control of the national policies of America, by lobbyist groups, mainly military lobbies, and financial lobbies attached to the Jewish-American community.

Both kind of lobbies are in symbiosis in the Semite wars against Islamic countries. The military lobbies make great profits, and the Jewish Lobbies believe to help the cause of Israel. How wrong they are! How much better it would have been a peaceful Israel, knot of tourism and trade in the navel of civilizations!

This interest for an expansion of the Palestine-Israel conflict to the world is so obvious in the way Jewish-American mass-media has enlarged the conflict, that there have been rumors about a possible forehand knowledge of the WTC plot. Those rumors said that the attack could have been prevented, but it was ignored. Those rumors go to the extreme of possible stock-market profits obtained not only by Mr. Osama but by Western financial groups... A meeting of power financiers might have been canceled for that same day in the World Trade center. Are we in front of a new Pearl Harbor, known to the Intelligence Services of America, and ignored for its long term benefits to the war industries? Probably we will never know as propaganda wars create different information in both sides of the war.

In any case even if those rumors are just Islamic propaganda, it is clear that the war has reinforced enormously the position of the two main America lobbies interested in violent wars - the Jewish American lobby in defense of Israel and its interests in the key violent industries of America, mass-media and Weapons - and the military lobby in power, around Chenney, Bush and Powell. We might say that if Osama had not existed, it should have been invented. In a way he was invented in the 80s and 90s by the military fights of USA and Russia. Now that this new monster, as evil as Saddam might have been, exists and has acted, its brutal attack has to be exploited to create the conditions of a long war, that gives long profits to lobbyists, politicians and military industry.

We are not against the revenge and capture of Bin Laden, but against the methods and hidden agendas of the present war.

In other words, against lobbyism in democracies, which not only provokes the a priori conditions of violence, but once violence explodes it magnifies that violence to provoke a profitable state of war.

Indeed, if paltry excuses from the perspective of an untouched America, such as those given by Saddam, or Milosevic allowed important wars, a direct attack to the symbols of the American Military-Industrial system (Pentagon, Wall Street), has given the upper hand to America. Now America can if so wishes destroy half of the Muslim nations of the world. 2 are on its account. More will follow?

Let us hope not, or else the counter-attack (atomic terrorism), will plunge the world definitively in that Orwellian nightmare.

Killing Mr. Bin Laden is necessary. Yet the means of America to solve any violent dispute are wrong, because they magnify the problem, and the violence attacked to this problem.

Massive bombings of civil population - which is always around when targets are so diffuse as 'military depots' - instead of the skillful use of land troops and diplomatic efforts - are a wrong procedure that obeys to an industrial reason: military lobbyism.

It is a long tendency: First, we witnessed huge investments in technological star war shields, when it was self-evident (see August article on the matter in this magazine) that a terrorist attack would use the very same weapons that exist inside America. The shield was the wrong way to protect Americans, but the two great lobbies in control of American policies could profit from that shield. The Military would make huge profits, and the Jewish-American lobby could get for free for Israel in the nearby future, a protective system that in a tiny, highly disciplined, militaristic nation such as Israel could indeed work. So lobbyism, and the industrial salaries of senators preferred to invest billions on automated weapons than on efficient human jobs for security people of all kind.

The consequences of those 'technological' investments, are now clear. America has been unable to kill Mr. Bin Laden, and uses technological war planes, and expensive warfare, for what obviously is the wrong method to kill Mr. Bin Laden. The humanistic catastrophe this has caused, proves also the essential racism of our Western society - what we call 'scientific racism', caused by the process of Industrial Evolution. Indeed, the thousands bond to die of hunger, this winter in Afghanistan are not 'humans'? Not so for the west. Every day 30.000 children die of hunger and disease in the Third World, but nobody cares...

Our magazine always stresses the need to overcome the problems of history with human solutions, with diplomacy, human soldiers, human goods, not with Technology, and expensive machines.

Today after two months of massive bombings, the entire world except the American government, seem to realize that such technological religions, are criminal solutions that only worsen the problem, and help not America.

And yet the worse is to come. If Mr. Bin Laden or other radical group during the next months or years, of open war and racism against Islamic nation, is able to put an A-bomb in the West, the Orwellian Nightmare will become an absolute reality... Yet, the only solution to that possible nightmare - a peace in Palestine, and a fast land-operation to capture Bin Laden have been both ignored. Why?

Plainly because America no longer works for their people, but for their lobbies. For the militaristic lobby mentioned above, and the Jewish Lobby in a similar situation of monopoly over international foreign policies, they routinely buy. Indeed, Jewish-Americans control those International policies. Of all the American groups, only the Jewish have a strong attachment to a foreign nation, and so they pay far more for international laws and policies in favor of Israel, that let us say, the Wasp, or German groups of America, for policies in favor of England or Germany. Jewish Americans and Militaristic industries invest more in Lobbyism for those reasons.

The result is that both together have become since the earlier 70s, the main 'causes' of American policies in the World. Without them, America would not be engaged today in the Semite wars, that since the 70s (Yon Kippur War) to the 80s (Iran, Libya), to the 90s (Iraq, Kosovo), to the 2000s (Afghanistan), follow a similar pattern, that has become as repetitive as to shape a peculiar economical, political cycle. The cycle of the Semite wars, in which military industries, politicians, mass-media, and International politics flux together to create such 'splendid little wars'.

The Semite wars: asymmetric wars.

The Semite wars are indeed a long-lasting case of the Paradox of History. Now two Semite cultures: one maintained in the Neolithic, the other at the Head of the economic ecosystem are confronting each other. The deeper reasons are probably economical: Israel rejected a few decades ago a peaceful model of industrial Evolution, and a civil society. Instead it accepted military industries as the backbone of the nation, hence pushing hard-nose politicians, and fundamentalist thought, as it happened in America.

It might seem to us that the reasons are religious or political. They are not. An example: in the Israeli parliament, SAS, the ultra orthodox party backs peace with Palestine, in a greater measure that Likkud, the main stream conservative party, which is the party of the Industrial-Military complex.

On the other side of the Semite Wars also the expansion of weapons, dictatorships and radical poverty, have cast aside the peaceful politicians and priests of Islam. While the enormous attention given to Fundamentalism and Bin Laden by mass-media has caused a further expansion of those tendencies, that now are much stronger in all Islamic nations that they were two months ago.

Indeed, despite the seemingly quick end of the Afghan war, the lack of any interest in solving the mother-conflict, Israel Vs Palestine on the Jewish-American side, will keep increasing the power of fundamentalism in Islam till a new Bin Laden appears in a few years.

Poverty will grow worldwide, since as America enter fully in the Semite wars his economic ecosystem will protect himself from any critique, even those critiques done peacefully like anti-Globalization groups... either repressing violently activists against the system (with the fascist measures against citizen's freedoms taken by Mr. Bush Cabinet), or choking as it does already all our outlets of communication to reformers. On the other hand verbal civilizations such as Islam, that agonize due to the globalization of the economic ecosystem, will loose all hope of dialog and survival, and enter into an spiral of violence, and self-suicide.

As a consequence the Semite wars are intensifying. The outcome will be clear: human rights will diminish and the rights of machines and the military to control us will grow as in all previous wars.

For that reason in our last issue we warn about the traps of state terrorism and individual terrorism, which are the two sides of the same coin, the basic forms of militarism in the rich and the poor nations.

Indeed, let us speak clearly. Most of the so called Arab terrorism, is basically the way poor Islamic nations make war against First world nations. Mr. Bin Laden was the minister of defense of Afghanistan. So Afghanistan, as Iran did in the past, is doing war to the West, in defense of the Islamic culture. While most other terrorist groups are related to Palestinians, who fight tanks and missiles with stones and bombs. Yet Palestinians are defending themselves against the state terrorism of Israel. While Afghanistan has become a fundamentalist violent nation, because Russia practiced state terrorism for a decade in that nation... Then America bred Mr. Bin Laden and his Muhaiddin to practice state terrorism... Now American air strikes are again practice state terrorism against an Islamic nation. The result so far are 7 million people about to suffer hunger, millions of Russian mines on the Afghan territory, thousands of maimed human beings...

This is why we cannot applaud the approach to the WTC massacre, in which words are used wrongly, targets are misleading, and the real problems and causes of the tragedy are hidden. It is what neofascism needs to make the lives of the majority of the people who only want to live with minimal rights, even harder than it is today. The suffering of the Iraqi children that had nothing to do with Saddam, was imposed by the revenge of the west. The suffering of Afghans today, is imposed by the revenge of the West.

The correct reading of the WTC attack is that of an act of brutal guerrilla warfare, by the most radical soldiers of the oldest western war bred by two imperialistic states: Russia and America. Both now ally against a Neolithic dictatorship, Afghanistan, hit by decades of war, probably unable to deliver Mr. Bin Laden, instead of using the natural means to control International criminals, without making them the main protagonists of History.

In that sense both sides of the fight are equally brutal. Mr. Bin Laden, hit the military and economical 'symbolic' buildings of the economic ecosystem based in Military Lobbyism, that has taken over America, the pentagon and the WTC. Those two institutions are indeed negative to mankind, but to destroy them with their own systems of violence has validated them, as victims... On the other hand, as it did with Saddam, the West massacres people, bombs and uses his machines of war, indifferent to the real goals of this offensive, more interested in greasing their Weapons, than solving the underlying causes of the crisis.

All this leads to unavoidable conclusion: The catastrophe of the World Trade center is a barbarous act, but it is not unfortunately an isolated act of terrorism that will not happen again, due to all those previous systemic sickness of the human social organism.

We conclude that it is rather like Mr. Bush said, an act of war of a dying civilization, against the two symbols of the economic world ecosystem - the pentagon, and Wall Street - that are causing the general suffering of that civilization. Unfortunately as all acts of war against an empire, that do not listen to reason, the outcome never is positive. Not only 6000 thousand innocent people died on those attacks, but the answer of the American economic ecosystem is a predictable offensive against Afghanistan and any other nation that might protect terrorism, in which thousands, even millions of innocent people will be displaced, suffer hunger and death.

Moreover the brutal system of power, developed in the past decades in America, based in raw justice, violence and monetary corruption has now a great opportunity to extend further. What this means of course is the extension of the police system of control created in Israel against terrorism, first to America, and then to the World at large - the beginning of the Orwellian world. Ariel Sharon made a meteoric career to the presidency of Israel after the massacres of Shabra and Shatila...

It is the old question, what is first the egg or the chicken? Both go together, and one cannot exist without the other.

In the list of deceased people Americans are not classified by race, since it has been a policy of information during the tragedy to highlight the "American unity in front of terrorism", and minimize information that could break that 'needed emotional rush towards war'. So we have not seen the real effects of war: maimed bodies suffering victims, splashed Heads. Real effects that might have disgusted so much Americans, as to avoid their desire for war. Nor there have been listings of victims by races, that would show the overwhelming majority of Jewish-Americans among the victims, highlighting the ultimate nature of the Semite wars, to which this battle belongs: the confrontation between the two most extreme fundamentalist religions of today: the fundamentalist Judaism of Ariel Sharon, and the fundamentalist Islam of Jihad.

Problem is that the combined effect of a real vision of the horrendous process of death, caused by the falling towers - to the point that a witness said, 'it was raining blood' - and the dissociation of the tragedy from America at large, as an episode of the Semite wars going on in the Middle East for almost a century, would have raised the big question, the real question all Americans should be asking, instead of buttressing themselves for the Orwellian nightmare of a constant, police security state in permanent war against an invisible enemy:

"Why we the Americans have to enter into the brutality of the Semite wars which do not concern us at all?" "Couldn't we avoid those wars as the Europeans have done?"

"What should we do once revenge against Bin Laden is achieved, to avoid the repetition of events like the WTC catastrophe, and leave behind the Semite wars, to focus American in the real problems faced by XXI Century Americans: the robotization of our industries and military systems, and the consequent loss of human jobs, and danger to our species, the growing poverty of the middle and lower classes of America, the dehumanization of our cultures by violent mass-media, the spread of lethal products and weapons at all levels of society, the massive extinction of nature?"

The WTC massacre.

Tragic as it seems, the WTC catastrophe, was a very likely event within the previous objective analysis of the bio-historic sickness of our ecosystems of history and economics. All the elements, cause of the present lethal power of terrorism, and the brutal treatment of Third World nations by Global Capitalism, seemed to flux on those towers, the symbol of western power, of the Jewish-American power, of the economical and social forces that in the view of many millions of Third world people are tearing their World apart... In that sense we will contradict ourselves now. It is truth that Mr. Bin Laden is alone and alone should be punished in this action . But he might be a predecessor to a growing number of terrorist groups coming out of the very wrong policies the First world is promoting in the political and economical arena. If the policies of the First World are going to be those outlined by Mr. Bush: limits to civil liberties, acceptance of torture, detention of people without limits on time, control of conversations, surveillance cameras in all points of the planet, in our countries; and total indifferent from an economical point of view, to the needs of the poor, terrorism will increase, and state terrorism will convert our daily life into a nightmare.

Instead, we should consider and work in the solution of the fundamental causes of this war.

The causes of global terrorism and the WTC attack.

- The obvious cause ofthe WTC attack is Mr. Bin Laden and the Taliban. So Mr. Bin Laden and his group, should be the only target of the west. Yet Mr. Bin Laden is only a cell of a civilization that will repeat itself unless the deeper causes of Islamic terrorism are cured. So the structural causes of the massacre will not end with the death of Bin Laden.

For this reason in this magazine of bio-history concerned with the deeper causes of reality, we will not focus on the figure of Bin Laden, since the usual press, is a far more reliable source for that kind of individual information. The Bioeconomist is interested in the physiological, collective processes that determine history, not in the individuals. Mr. Bin laden obviously is a very able terrorist, but if he had not appeared, another man would have taken his place. He is a consequence of our social sicknesses, in our systems of energy, distribution, and information, financial visual and legal...

Mr. Bin Laden decided to side against America, after the Iraq wars, when the Americans invaded Arabia, with the consent of the Arab government, but the opposition of the radical Muslim groups of its population. America on the view of those groups fought a war on behalf of Israel... that arguably America precipitated betraying Saddam. The tale goes as follows: it seems Mr. Saddam, at the time the man of America against Iran, as Mr. Bin Laden was the man of America against Russia in Afghanistan, asked the American ambassador what would be the American reaction to that attack; and it was neither encouraged, nor persuaded, so he went aHead, taking Kuwait, an old province of Iraq, as the prize for his dirty war against Iran. Then it was betrayed and destroyed once the invasion was completed. On the view of many Arabs, all had been a maneuver of the shrewd Jewish-Americans to eliminate two possible rivals to Israel's supremacy in the area. First Iran destroyed by Iraq. Then Iraq destroyed by America.

We can see a clear parallelism between the hate of Saddam to the Bush dynasty and the hate of Bin Laden. Both felt betrayed by their former ally. The Iraqi war lead by Mr. Bush's father, introduces a factor of individual hate so proper of the Arab people. The Bedouin culture is based in individual hates and bondages. Mr. Bin Laden obviously hates the Bush dynasty as Mr. Saddam does; and the fact that Mr. Bush has sided with Mr. Ariel Sharon's brutal policies in a very simplistic manner, has undoubtedly triggered the personal revenge of Mr. Bin Laden.

In that sense the two individuals in this crisis, Bin Laden and Mr. Bush appear both as 'causes' of Global Terrorism and Global Militarism, negative factors that will increase not cure the crisis, moved by their hate and love of weapons, and economic interests in the Military industry.

- All this leads to a second factual cause of the WTC attack. The war underlying that battle - the conflict directly related to the WTC massacre - the Middle East conflict, the Semite wars. It is obvious that the WTC catastrophe was an attack to the policies of Sharon in Palestine, backed by the Bush dynasty... Two simple proves: the master of Bin Laden in his initial steps in guerrilla warfare was a Palestinian. The World Trade Center was the hub of Wall Street, the 'Jewish-American' controlled economical center of world power (around 70% of firms and lawyers in Wall Street are Jewish Americans, and most of the Americans that died in the WTC were Jewish). America instead of Europe has been targeted, because America is on the view of Muslim nations, the big Israel, directed by and for Jewish interests, which dictate its international policies.

All those individual factors, and collective alliances between America and Israel explain why America finds itself immersed, inside the longest conflict of present history, the "Semite wars". To understand those Semite wars, we will introduce some basic concepts of bio-history regarding the Jewish and Muslim religions and civilizations, and how America has become the key nation to understand modern Judaism. In that sense the WTC attack is a predictable answer to the alignment of America with Mr. Ariel policies...

Let us hear the other side, the 'muhaiddin' Mr. Bin Laden's on this, rather common vision the Islamic world has about the control of America by Jewish Policies:

"The American government, we think, is an agent that represents the Israel inside America. If we look at sensitive departments in the present government like the Department of Defense or the State Department, or sensitive security departments like the CIA and others, we find that Jews have the first word in the American government, which is how they use America to carry out their plans in the world and especially the Muslim world.The American government, in a time where there are millions of Americans living on the street and those living below the standard of living and below the poverty line, we find the American government turning toward helping Israel in occupying our land and building settlements in the Holy Land. The American government is throwing away the lives of Americans in Saudi Arabia for the interests of the Jews. So, we tell the American as a people, and we tell the mothers of soldiers, and American mothers in general, if they value their lives and those of their children, find a nationalistic government that will look after their interests and not the interest of the Jews. The continuation of the tyranny will bring the fighting to America, like Ramzi Yousef and others. This is my message to the American people to look for a serious government that looks out for their interest and does not attack others, their lands or their honor. "

To which extent this is truth, will be discussed in detail latter in this issue. However it is in any case the perceived truth, in the world at large, and specially in the Muslim world, as lobbyism takes over American politics. Which means that in the Third World at large, Mr. Bin Laden is perceived as a guerrilla leader, as a military, a Muhaiddin, not a terrorist, in as much as this is not so much a terrorist attack but another battle of those Semite wars.

- Which brings a third fundamental problem to be solved in Global politics: the power of international lobbyisms, that manipulate in many cases the policies of national interest, to cater certain groups of pressure.

The case of American International Politics in favor of Israel, the case of American policies backing Ozone pollution, in favor of Oil Companies, are two clear cases of negative policies against the American people, caused by lobbyism. It is the sickness of the American democracy, that goes against the will of the American people, and will be studied latter in detail. Indeed, due to the negative effects for America, of the present close relationship between America and Israel we might wonder:

Why America follows the policies of Israel, a small nation of 6 million people, to the risk of confronting a billion people civilization?

It is obvious that the policy that best suits America would be neutrality in a conflict - the Semite wars - remote and far removed from the problems of America... And yet America does not follow American policies, but Israeli policies. The answer has to do with the sickness of the American civilization and political system which is lobbyism. In America policies and laws are bought by groups that are interested in certain laws to favor their products. For example, General Motors bought LA town politicians to prevent the construction of the subway so much needed by that city, to foster the consume of cars. In matters of International politics, very few groups are interested and bid for laws, except the Jewish-Americans which happen also to be the wealthiest American community (with rents around 5 times that of the average American) due to their long-standing control of the American financial system. The result is that the Jewish culture bids and controls the international policies of America. In that sense to understand America today is far more important to understand the Jewish culture, which rules the American economic and political system through his lobbies, and unlimited credit in Wall Street. It is important to set aside your myths about democracies. America is not a democracy but a "monocracy", where money buy laws, specifically an 'stockracy', where the people who own stocks have credit to buy laws, and do buy laws. Before I world war those people were mainly Calvinists and Puritans of New England and the Industrialized Lake states. Today those people are mainly Jewish-Americans. And so to understand America today and his future we have to understand the culture that controls it. As we need to understand the culture of the 30.000 Spaniards that dominated America in the XVI century, and not the culture of the 30 million Native Americans, that no longer controlled their own future. This issue will therefore also deal with Jewish-America, and the cycles of History of Judaism. Our title "The Semite wars' is clear. This war is a war between Jewish America and Muslim nations. The Americans happen to be part of the war, in as much as they belong to a nation controlled by Jewish lobbies. So today Americans hate Islam as they hated Catholicism a century ago when their nation was controlled by Calvinist Lobbies.

- Still the WTC attack and the subsequent killing of thousands of innocent people by just a few people, could not have been possible without cheaper lethal Weapons and violent mass-media.

As the creation of The Metal-earth, and the process of Industrial evolution continues, a world designed to the image and resemblance of machines, explained by violent digital languages becomes alien to man, too big, disproportionate and dangerous. The enormous size of those towers, built with minimal elements to sustain their weight, with a design that capitalized 'savings in materials' (a mere four structural column on the sides of the square with a center column for communications, easy to burn), is in great measure responsible for the catastrophe. The oversized design of planes also to save costs, makes each Boeing a high powered missile... The catastrophe of a B-52, a huge transport military plane against the empire state building in the 50s only caused debris and a dozen fatalities...

We live increasingly in a metal-world built to the image and resemblance of machines in which men are fragile, diminutive species, subject to sheer forces of destruction... Take a frightening fact, A-bomb suitcases designed by the Russians in the early 80s, in the height of the cold war, are known to be in the hands of the Russian Mafia. It is very likely that the Russian Mafia sold some of them to strong terrorist groups. Probably Mr. Bin Laden has obtained some of those bombs as European newspapers warn in their last editions... What will happen if one of the American cities is blown up by an A-bomb? We will deal with that matter latter in this issue.

- Another element that has made possible suicidal commandos so rare in previous ages of terrorism is the culture of violence and fiction in which we live. Indeed, there is a growing world of violent, beautiful fiction, a virtual reality that feeds the dreams and actions of human beings with images of aesthetic death that noting have to do with reality. It is a visual culture based in metal-communicators that stresses violence as the solution to all problems. It affects all human beings equally, and undoubtedly it explains what we call the "Neo-Paleolithic': the regression of human cultures towards a primitive visual world, of minimal logic thought, and dramatic actions. While violent attitudes might be positive in the simple world of Paleolithic hunters, it is obviously not a positive form of action in a complex society like ours. America has made of fictional violence an art, which seems to work perfectly. So people think to kill is easy, and it solves problems when merely makes them worse. Fundamentalism in both religions, Islam and Judaism, and in militarism in America owe a lot of popularity to that constant violence we observe in our informative culture, that has totally degraded the classic ethics of mankind. Indeed, some recent films showed plots similar to the WTC attack.

Many of those catastrophic films are realistic but the end is a dramatic fantasy that always ends well and favors the subjective good guy... The result is that the audience becomes irresponsible to historic problems and expects a salvation miracle, that doesn't happen in real life. Indeed, history ends badly when it starts badly. Americans are living the visual dream, not a real vision of the processes of history and ec

onomics, but a biased vision, manipulated by his economical and political elites. Hollywood says: 'it has to look real but it cannot be real', and 'we need a happy end'. Or in other words: people cannot know the truth. It is too frightening, and they might rebel. So we cheat them straight with happy endings and one sided solutions: violence and money. The result is that Americans behave like Hollywood characters

Why that influence? Because the language precedes the action and suggests it. A weapon suggests murder, money suggests consume, images suggest actions, as do words. So the arguments of many film makers inspire real people. By biasing their description of reality towards an immoral, violent fiction that looks good in the screen, they suggest those actions. When they reject the logic ends to those tragedies, film makers increase with a happy end the probability of people committing those actions... Yet we need still the desire to harm, the desperation and suicidal hate that those terrorists showed in the WTC massacre... Unfortunately such desperation is a growing sensation among a wide spectrum of mankind...

- Subconsciously, the west has caused a confrontation between both worlds, with his one-sided vision of man, economics, political systems, and technology, clearly opposed to the vision hold by third world civilizations.

Problem is the western culture is not the only truth about man. The ideologies of the west, the myth of democracies, the myths of the scientific method, the myths of economics, are plainly false. Even though the West does not understand under the constant pressure of those ideologies, its own errors as a civilization, those errors are much more evident to the Third World. So the messianic expansion of the technological, digital civilization of the machine, to the Third world, is for many people in those countries a brutal process of colonization they resent.

We conclude the cause of the hate that feeds terrorism is a wrong process of one-sided Globalization. Which means that a single culture, the radical free economical ecosystem lead by America, spreads worldwide, degrades and destroys all other cultures, which resist that destruction by all means including violence and terrorism.

Resistance to globalization is logic. All cultures fight for survival regardless of the quality of its cultures. Imagine the reaction of Americans if the Catholic church - arguably a more evolved form of social Love religions - would come and impose itself, against Judaism or Protestant thought. If the French came with their food, arguably healthier and taster than the American one, and substituted our fast-food chains. A Jewish-American friend, producer of an expensive Hollywood film shot in France told me an anecdote: they had to change the initial cooker, a French master of continental cuisine, by an American one. The crew rioted because they did not want French cuisine but good hamburgers with fries... The example shows a fact about civilizations: whatever the quality of their products and ideas are, civilizations resist extinction with violence. Only a mild, diplomatic, friendly approach to them might avoid such confrontations. It is precisely the opposite what happens today: the west as always has done imposes his culture with enormous aggressiveness, expanding the dog-eat-dog culture of the economic ecosystem to all the world, many times against the will of communities based in agriculture, ethic religions and a lot of free time, as the Muslim culture is.

- Imperialism finds always resistance. The Americans should forget the Hollywood dream that the World can be ruled with imperial policies without rebellion. Spain in the XVI century, Holland in the XVII century, England and France in the XVIII and XIX century, and finally Germany in the earlier XX century, tried to create World Empires without the consent of the people they ruled. They were in turn hated, fought, and mostly defeated by the world at large. Millions of them died in those attempts to create unilateral empires, and as technology improved the causalities grew. Ultimately beyond the official reaction of all countries fearful of America, the low echo that demonstrations in favor of America have in the different capitals of the world, as the conflict spreads, responds to that subconscious hate of the world against imperialism, the wrong system of globalization.

When communism collapsed, many of us thought it was the essential chance for mankind to build under the leadership of America, a world government, that could evolve history, end lethal wars, improve the production of Human goods, educate mankind and create a paradise on Earth: a planet built to the image and resemblance of man. American Lobbies, and its hired politicians though did not think the same.

So instead of leading a World government in which the voices of the other people are heard, from New York, with the help of the UNO, America leads the world alone, unfortunately with very negative consequences for most of the world at large, the 70% of poor nations suffering under globalization. Spain, Britain, and Germany tried to do the same in the past. Only Britain succeeded and yet it was not a glorious victory. Under the British rule, the I Industrial Evolution massacred millions of people. Slavery was wide spread. Massacres of colonial people, a day to day affair. At the end another rival European nation trying to do the same, Germany, brought the entire world into a collective massacre. It seems we have learnt nothing from it. Now America wants to rule alone the world as England did, not even for the profit of the English or American people, but for the profit of a small caste of 'stockrats', very wealthy people, owners of a few stock companies, that are able to expel millions of Americans out of work to put computers and robots and increase profits, or let assault weapons to be sold to Africans, or try to prevent cheap prices for Aids medicines, to increase profits, regardless of the corpses those policies cause. Such elite of companies that lobbies against the Kyoto Treaty, confronting all the their nations of the world, that does not sign the treaty against bacteriological weapons, confronting all other nations of the world, etc. etc. has been targeted now, by the most radical, lethal groups of the poorest, oldest culture of the world - terrorist Islam.

That economical ecosystem has his center in new York, and within new York in wall street, whose emblematic building were the WTC. It is then obvious that sooner or latter, those weak structures built to the arrogance of the Homo Economicus would fall down by the long list of enemies of the American empire. America is not Britain, but rather Holland, searching for global power in the XVII World, for several reasons. Technologies of extinction are cheap and readily available, as those A-bomb suitcases, in sale a few years ago by Russian Mafia. America is an open society where people can move freely. There are millions of Americans who are very angry to the policies of their elite. And billions of foreigners that do not share those policies.

That combination of weakness and collective hate against America is similar to the feelings aroused by the first Industrial empire based in weapons industries established in Holland. Holland was weak, a continental small nation easy to destroy. Holland was hated by most of the dominant Catholic nations of the age. And yet Holland was playing with fire, buttressing the armies of the 30 years war that massacred Germany, pirating against the boats of France Spain and Portugal, even England, his traditional ally, in the seven seas. So Holland was invaded, and his dams were opened, and the country collapsed in 1688...

Atomic terrorism, nanorobotics, bacteriological Weapons, curiously developed in his first forms by Americans, can be easily used by a tiny group of people to destroy America and in the case of nanorobotics (metal bacteria, and reproductive lethal Robots), cause the destruction of the entire planet.

Britain was secluded, protected by sea much better than any missile shield will protect America from individual terrorists within the country (no nations will send missiles to America, but will bring it easily to a sport yacht club...) And Britain had policies far less intrusive, and diplomatic that America has. In this manner Britain slowly built an empire in III centuries, and yet it found finally in Germany its nemesis, and despite winning I and II World war, its demise as a world empire...

We conclude that the path of an unilateral empire, without hearing the opinion of the third world and other growing nations like China, will not work. Arrogance, simplicity and violence, the tools of single nation empire-building are too raw for a complex world in which a single race, the human race, equal in genetics and nature, spread over some 200 nations. It has never worked and it will not work with America, but on the contrary cause the dismissal of America as the only Global power, in economical, military or political conflict with other nations.

- As a consequence of a wrong process of globalization the sickness of paradox of History has worsened enormously in the past 3 decades. Part of that process that extinguishes the Carbo-Earth and evolves The Metal-earth, the world of machines, is the degradation of nature. Yet the degradation of carbo-earth does not affect only to animal life, but also to non-technological cultures based in Words and Neolithic goods, instead of money and machines. Those nations ruled by verbal networks of information (laws or religions) instead of money, and dedicated to the creation of simple human goods (food, housing, free time) instead of machines, are in a constant struggle for survival, opposed to our first world. Most of them have died away after long suffering and massacres. Africa died away into the inferno of slavery and the present inferno of assault weapons in the hands of tribal thugs. South-America died away into the inferno of Spanish colonialism, and the present inferno of American economical control.

India was brutalized by the British empire. And so it was China, till the very same Chinese converted to industrialization and continued with communism the massacre of the Neolithic Chinese cultures. However it seemed so easy to win over those cultures, that the West never cared to count the victims. Perhaps 20 million died in Bengal when the British Indian Company took over that region and forbade their people to raise food crops. They had to make tea for the company, and so 2/3rds of the Bengalis died of hunger. The Spaniards dwindled the South-American native population to 1/4th, the Europeans basically extinguished the Indians in North-America.

The constant confrontation between preying economical ecosystems (nations ruled by money and industrial ideologies such as America) and decaying religious, historic societies (nations ruled by verbal laws or ethic religions) seemed today a thing of the past, as all historic societies died away substituted by economical ones. Once communism - a mixed form of an economical, militaristic society and a society ruled by verbal ideas - collapsed, the game seemed over. Not so. In Biological ecosystems, it is proved that the first form to appear in any species is the last to go. When mankind becomes extinguished by the III Industrial evolution of robotics, under the present absurd policies of economists, Africans will survive. The last man to die to Terminator will be an African where less Terminators there will be.

That is the reason why Islam survives as a Neolithic social culture, that still holds the concept of a social God, a verbal God that rules the mind of their individuals, as money rules the mind of humans in economic ecosystem. Islam is the oldest human civilization, where verbal laws have ruled human brains for longer, and so a short of genetic imprinting, of 'Social Gods', a subconscious understanding of Human social organisms, in which each man is a cell of a collective social God, expressed with words, exist.

If you observe any World map of the old Neolithic cultures in the 3000 BC, in the Eurasian continent, the coincidence between civilized religions and modern Islam nations is striking. Every earlier civilized Neolithic emporium is today an Islamic nation. The Egyptian civilization, the Indus civilization, the Mesopotamic civilization, the Levantine civilization in which Israel lays, the Ganges delta...

It is in that sense a clash of civilizations, with brutal methods between a suicidal culture - the Industrial world that worships machines and profits over human rights - and a dying culture - Islam, the oldest Neolithic carbo-earth culture of mankind, agonizing under the rule of military dictatorships and fundamentalist priests. On the side of America there is a massive technological power, that can simply extinguish the entire population of Islam.

On the side of Islam there is a concept which Americans erased in verbal thought, controlled by digital languages of power (money, images) no longer understand: the sacrifice of the individual Homo Bacteria, to the collective social God Islam is made up with Homo Organicus, the oldest, socially most cohesive populations of this planet, already organized in Neolithic villages, 5000 years ago. To a believer, a person who feels part of a bigger historic organism, to a cell of any Universal organism, life must be sacrificed for the good of the community. So the kamikaze of Japanese armies, the Palestinian terrorist with the bomb around his body, or the hijackers of the 4 planes crashed the 11th September, feels himself a mere cell of a bigger organism - Japan, Palestine, Islam - for which he sacrifices himself.

Of course on the long term US won against Japan, Israel has expanded against Palestine, and America will probably defeat Bin Laden. But the cost will be higher than expected without counting that human factor. When Hiroshima happened there were still around 3 million Japanese soldiers in occupied territories. Israel despite its mighty power has not yet ended with the Palestines, and America, is miles away from solving the tragedy of the WTC.