The Paradox of History is a biological paradox between two ecosystems, the economic ecosystem made of animetals and machines, and the historic and nature ecosystem, made of carbolife, and social human beings.
There have been many ways to explain the paradox of history. Authors have talked of social classes, of a fight between good and bad people, of the fight between the first world [economic nations] and the third world (agricultural nations), of superior races (animetals) Vs inferior species (human beings)...
The best way to explain the paradox of history is to talk of the confrontation between two different organic ecosystems, the ecosystem of history ruled by verbal information, rich in human goods, and symbiotic to nature, the world of agricultural civilizations; and the ecosystem of economics, ruled by monetary information, rich in metallic goods, and symbiotic to machines, the world of cities and industrial civilizations.
Once the hypothesis of 2 ecosystems on The Earth is firmly established, a number of parallels between Economic and historic structures and organic structures confirms the existence of two organic systems on Earth, regulated by two different networks of energy and information. Humans are driven by certain natural needs: they are reproduced and evolve socially through sex and love - feelings based on verbal communication of our memories and selves (I think therefore I am). While books, art (visual perception) and literature (verbal perception), evolve the informative senses of man, and reproduce word ideas in the minds of believers, causing the informative networks of cultures. On the other hand, the production of human goods (housing, welfare, agriculture, etc.), is the energy system that maintains and allows the survival of the cells of the body of History (humanity) in their multiple organic tissues (cultures).
The body of Human History is better understood through such networks of information and energy: an ecosystem of cultural rites of communication and reproduction of human goods, which allows men to obtain energy, and information, to reproduce, evolve and refine their senses. This has been the nature of human History throughout most of its existence. The Human side of history that the doctors of History (politicians) should develop: a verbal brain of laws, ethics, and a Paradise of Human Goods, based on carbolife species...
On the other hand, economic societies, and their two main networks, informative money, machines and weapons, are a different organism than cultural societies with his verbal networks and carbolife species (human beings and agricultural species). They are made of two different atomic species, metal and carbon, and they use different energy. We talk of two ecosystems, a carbolife world, and a metal-machine world. In the next graph, we distinguish the goods of both different ecosystems. Planets of flesh, of carbolife, of nature, are planets full of human goods. Planets of metal are planets full of metal goods. Both kind of systems are different ecosystems.
One system has become the dominant system of the Earth today. It is the economic system, the organism of the economy ruled by monetary information. The other ecosystem based in the language of human power, verbal thought, and the reproduction of human goods, is becoming substituted by that economic ecosystem, that is the paradox of history which confronts both languages and species:
LANGUAGE
SPECIES: MATHEMATICS WORDS TOP
PREDATOR SPECIES: MACHINES. HUMANS
Human goods should be promoted by all means, since they increase the energy and information of humanity, evolving history, and improving our life, hence improving the survival of our species. While the opposite occurs. In economic ecosystems, metal goods multiply, weapons produce war, money substitute human values, and men change their personality, dedicating all their time to improve the existence of machines while human goods become scarce.
Metal Species Against Human Species
The confrontation between both kind of networks and species, metal-networks and natural networks is self-evident. Words and money have different values. Weapons “extinguish” life, and “energize” the evolution and reproduction of machines which increases in war. On the other hand, men are killed by war. We can express this in a formula, the Paradox of History:
Max. war=Max. metal evolution=Max. Human devolution=Min Human Goods.
Creation of the economic ecosystem = Extinction of the carbolife ecosystem.
In biological terms we say that metal energy preys on human energy, the bodies of cellular men. Does money also prey on verbal information? Does money corrupt ideologies of verbal thought? It is obvious that money and the species it helps to reproduce (weapons, metal-communicators such as TVs) prey on and substitute verbal ethics, and religions of love... Ethics and Economics have always been opposed. In History metal-species created by man, prey on Human verbal networks and cultures.
Technological nations are by essence, in scientific=evolutionary terms evil=extinctive civilizations. For example Nazis “extinguished” millions of humans, despite the fact that “technology” never evolved more during history than in Germany during the ages of Prussian militarism and its later decadent version, Nazism. Germany split the atom for the first time and bred the people who invented the A-bomb. They developed modern chemistry, modern physics, most of the present machines, the first digital computer.
They
were the embodiment of the scientific method. Metal-Historians
who think metal only means progress for man, have always been puzzled by such
contradictions. Was Germany a great or a bad nation? Biological history explains
it without contradiction, through the paradox of History. Nazis were nazis precisely
because they were the most technologically evolved nation, where verbal truths
of History were more corrupted, and social evolution totally ignored.
Where only animetal ideologies, such
as the economic ideologiesof the present
world were considered true. A warning for nations who put technology and science
over human rights and ethics.
Animetals
Vs Human History
There
have been always two different ecosystems, and ways of understanding History,
the way of Human masters, and the way of metal masters [scientists, warriors
and money-makers] that worship metal. Let us resume that fight, in a wave with
two sides, the side of Human goods and Human masters, and the side of
Metal goods and metal masters, “animetals”, biological species
that are half human, half metal, because they rely of weapons, money and metal-minds
to “be”. In the graph, History confronts two ideologies, with different
goals of survival: life based cultures, that promote human
goods (life goods) and social evolution
(love religions) Vs metal based cultures and metal-species backed by animetals
(warriors of lineal metal, traders of cyclical metal and scientists of complex
metal) that promote Social Darwinism, competence
between humans and the evolution of metal.
It is the paradox of History that opposes Economics Vs History:
So we find in history two kind of civilizations: those who believe in love, ethics and promote human goods, religious and artistic civilizations, and those who believe in money, weapons and scientific machines, and promote war, and economic wealth. They cater to two different ecosystems: the human ecosystem of verbal information, and human goods, or point of view of human history, and the metal ecosystem of metal species and digital information, or point of view of economics.
Their opposition explains most of the events of History.
Why the ecosystem of money has won most of the battles of the previous graph?
The answer is: because unlike words which have hardly evolved since the great age of prophets, money has expanded its forms constantly, it has multiplied its species, its numbers, its quantities, and its capacity to value everything on Earth, till a point in which the hyper abundance of money and those species it reproduces in greater number, machines and weapons, have defeated the human world: a world made to the image and resemblance of the human kind and his ethic words. That triumph only can mean the extinction of human history and its species, and the creation of a new world, the metal-earth, inhabited by thinking machines, and metalife that will speak only digital languages.