Truth exist in societies

The idea that there is not a proper way to design societies because there is not truth in social sciences, is indeed the idea hold throughout history by ignorant or selfish people. The reasoning that backs such ideas is simple: since we do not know the truth about organic societies, there is no reason enough, for holding a type of positive social behavior.

Several arguments prove such reasoning wrong, demonstrating the existence of efficient, social systems:

Societies are organisms: their truths are organic truths

- Any society can be defined as an organism, so the laws and truths of societies will be the laws and truths of organisms. What are those laws? Let us make a short list of the main organic laws that apply to human and economic societies, based in the morphology and elements of organic species

The laws of organisms

- The Law of the 3 networks; the most important law that describes the nature of all Universal Organisms. All organisms and ecosystems of the Universe, are social organizations made of a mass of cells belonging to a few basic species communicated by 3 networks:

When we find those elements interconnecting multiple cells in a vital relationship, we talk of an 'organic ecosystem' or organism.

So we talk of human beings as organisms of DNA cells connected with informative/nervous systems, networks of blood/energy, and reproductive/endocrine systems.

We talk of History as a social organism of human cells, connected, by water rivers/energy veins that provide us with carbolife energy, and connected by informative verbal/legal networks.

Some of the main laws derived of the existence of those 3 networks are:

- The law of the 3 ages: All species go through 3 ages, youth in which energy networks dominate, maturity in which reproductive networks control the organism, and the age of in-form-ation, or third age when energy is consumed, and form, wrinkles and death appear. The law is proved by the morphology of all Universal organisms and all species that change from energy shapes to informative shapes, including Social organisms of history.

- The existence of 3 networks in all species explains the 3 behavioral drives of all organisms: Species need to maintain and provide for the 3 networks of the organism. So all species want to reproduce, to acquire energy and to acquire information. It applies to all organisms, from machines to human beings.

When those drives are denied, species fight for survival, or else die. As any body dies when its physiological networks become sick

When your blood system does not give energy to your cells, you die. When your nervous system no longer provides meaningful orders to your cells you die. So happens in history: when there is no food for social cells, hunger spreads and people die, when there is no harmony between different social organisms, there is war and people die. When the ethics and aesthetics that rule those nervous and energy systems of a society become corrupted, the organism enters in social strife, revolution and war...

Should we be surprised that cultures who deny those laws of social evolution are submitted to cycles of extinction, revolutions, wars and holocausts? Should we be surprised of the present sickness and pollution of mother Earth, taking into account how we are degrading our natural energy/information networks, and substituting them for networks of machines that use different energy and information (numbers) we humans cannot eat, and hardly understand?

Progress is only progress of human goods and human languages. When computers become more intelligent it means more numbers will dominate our society, and less people that uses words to become informed will be able to survive in this society.

What all this means is that man should evolve history and humanity according to the social laws of evolution, to human ethics and aesthetics.

The purpose of knowledge and truth.

As a consequence of the existence of those laws we do have a science of History and economics, a model of history and economics, that is real, and based in the proved laws of the universe, a 'truth' about the way societies are born, develop and die.

What is then the purpose of that knowledge, and how we should use it?

Obviously knowledge has a purpose which is to improve the life of those who know such laws. Knowledge is not abstract, but it is used by a species to portray accurately reality, and then to manipulate to his advantage that reality. Such should also be the purpose of social knowledge: to create a world to the image and resemblance of man based in human ethics and aesthetics, in which man ruled supreme.

An example of survival Vs extinction based in accurate knowledge of the laws of the universe.

To promote the evolution of history. According to those laws the scientists of history and economics [politicians and economists that understand those laws] should promote a healthy organism of history, and avoid the wrong paths of history, such as the evolution of lethal machines, robots, that according to evolutionary laws, will rival with man and probably kill History. We know by those laws, that robots will be living, vital species, not abstract objects, since all organisms are vitalized when we put together bodies and brains. We know they will show once they are vital a will of survival and reproduction [proved today by the behavior of their company mothers, who evolve and reproduce machines as their will of existence]. We know that their will of existence will make them rivals of men, and will make them extinguish the ecosystem of history, as they fight for a limited vital space in which to reproduce [as today company-mothers extinguish forests and non-technological societies expanding their networks of machines]. We know living machines will follow also the Oedipus paradox and kill their mother species. We know robots will follow the laws of social evolution and gather around Matrix, the networks of information of the Metal-earth, becoming more powerful than men. Robots will also apply the laws of Darwinian extinction to man, a different species and kill us. Plainly all the laws of the Universe point out, warn us, against robotics.

And yet the ignorance of the Laws of the Universe that apply to machines, the arrogance, and Copernican paradox of scientists, deny all those laws for mere profit and keep evolving Robots against the laws of survival of the Universe.

The example shows the enormous importance of a healthy organism of history, the fundamental importance of accurate verbal information, the natural information of mankind, since proper information is the key for the survival of any species in the Universe.

Truth is what make us survive

From gazelles who learn to hide from lions, to men who should avoid robotics, all species gather information to live, to survive.

Only scientists seem to be so stupid as to create rival informative machines for the pleasure of creation.

Truths about social sciences are not abstract truths, that should be dissociated from reality as politicians, economists and scientists - the actors of those ecosystems - pretend.

Economists, politicians, and scientists should be subservient to the ultimate truth of survival, judged and controlled by those truths of survival, and imposed limits to their actions when they collide with the survival truths of the Historic organism.

They should be hold responsible of their social, negative acts. The arrogant indifference they show today towards the effects of their 'cellular actions' over society based in the alibi that there is no social truth must end. Social truth exists, even if it is not favorable to the myths and lies of science, war and economics which are not truths but alibis and ideologies to justify the destructive actions of those groups of people.

The Universe is clear about the purpose of truths: all truths have a survival purpose. So men should always accept truths that favor human survival, truths based in human ethics and aesthetics, not in the ethics and aesthetics of machines, as the scientific method, and economics do, when they affirm that machines and numbers are more important than men, and their evolution is more important than the evolution of human societies, verbal ethics, and visual art.

Unfortunately, cultures of machines, animetals transform truths with myths to keep their control of mankind, the organic body of history ,of which animetals are just a 1-10% of society, even if they are against the collective survival.

The subjectivity of truths is due to the survival purpose of those truths

Social truths have an objective: to improve the life of the species and ensure their survival - in history human beings members of a historic society - that are directly affected by those truths.

In that sense social truths, social knowledge is biological. Knowledge about History and Economics is knowledge about what is good [what makes us survive] and what is bad [what destroys] our societies.

Ethical, survival knowledge is natural to all species and their linguistic, informative organs, who know what is bad=extinctive, and what is good=reproductive for them. This is the reason why languages spell subjective, different values on reality, since languages use truths in an active manner - to help the speaker in his actions and survival.

For example in "image languages," our eyes distinguish between "ugly", what harm us, and "beautiful," what cannot harm, or reproduce our species [the other sex]. We find insects very ugly because when we die they eat us and you imagine how painful that will be for our cells... Yet I am sure that an ant will find its ant-queen the most beautiful species of the Universe.

We see beauty in the other sex which helps us to survive genetically, to reproduce. Yet in most cases we do not feel attracted by our own sex. Obviously since gay people and our opposite sex feel attracted by those bodies we reject, such truths are subjective. So we tend to define beauty in terms of reproductive survival. We do the same with ethics and verbal statements: good is what help us, what favors our survival, the energy/information natural to our body. Bad is what kill us, what extinguishes us. In that sense ethics and aesthetics of human nature are subjective, survival human truths.

We dislike ugly machines, and warfare fields. They are an image of the inferno. Since we die in wars. Yet warriors and their word defenders [epic writers] praise them in art and literature.

So "subjective, survival truths" exists also in image languages.

It is then obvious that social, survival truths exist in all languages. Are the essence of languages. All languages are Copernican.

Thus Social truths are moral truths, vital truths and actions that make man survive and improve his life. And they are parallel to the biological truths of man. Those actions that bring us happiness, and cater to our biological needs [the will of man] are not only individual truths but also social truths. Those actions that destroy our lives, and the harmony of societies, are not social truths but lies that cater to the will of lethal machines.

Selection of species, is not only of external efficient bodies, but also of accurate information and objective minds hat determine a top predator organism, a survival organism.

The most complex languages make species like man survive other lesser thinking species such as lions. The capacity to understand the Laws of the Universe, its cycles, and predict them, and act in consequence determines the survival of species, from primitive humans that did not enter into lion caves, to modern nations that should understand the dangers of lethal machines, robots, and wars, and fight to control the reproduction of lethal goods, and to promote human goods, and social, human evolution. Yet today, social nations, human organisms have forgotten the social and survival laws of the Universe, and the purpose of truth. Today primitive ideologies of History, Science and Economics that promote machines over men drive the Human species towards obsolescence and extinction. The conclusion is obvious: either animetals evolve their ideologies of History and economics, and make them realistic, truthful to the laws of organic species, and Universal behavior, or they will become extinguished as a species.

You might wonder then: Why they don't do that. Why they don't evolve their ideologies in search of survival truths? Why they hold on so many myths about economics and history?

The languages of history are prone to falsity and myth

If we apply our definition of truth to the analysis of historic and economic ideologies we can understand easily why there are so many myths and false theories in those fields of knowledge.

- In first place verbal thought is a language that carries little information. So it is easy to manipulate and hide their truths. The verbal language is like seeing a beer in darkness since words talk about temporal things, often things that have happened in the past and we no longer see.

So it is easier to have misleading information, or little information, and hence to believe in wrong truths.

Moreover, people with power know this, so they tend to provide wrong information and hide information in order to control verbal, temporal truths. This is very useful, because we act according to the information we have. If we do not have information we do not act. If we do not see the bottle of beer, we will not ask the owner for a shot of beer... If we do not know that people invent money in the stock-market we will not ask for a fair share of that money as citizens of America... So historically there has been always a control of truths, by those in power, from the age of inquisitions, when the church controlled information, to the modern systems of control of information displayed by companies of mass-media attached to groups of power. Part of that strategy is to deny that truth exists in verbal thought. So people will not ask for truth and evidence, in verbal terms.

How can we correct those deficiencies of verbal truths?

First, by becoming aware that verbal truths are progressively manipulated by groups of power.

Then by understanding that the manipulation of truth, is systematic, and based in a few 'tricks' that tend to become repetitive in societies.

Again we could put a visual example of such tricks. You can cheat on the colors of things, with a filter of colors, that transform them. However that crystal will transform those colors always in the same manner. You can diminish light on the scene, but light will be lost in all objects... Those visual tricks are known: We can light back the scene through computers, and put back the colors properly. Only when there is no information at all we cannot reconstruct the visual truth.

Social Lies are myths that manipulate information to control people

So happens with lies about History and economics, the two subjects about which most people in power lie to cater their selfish goals, regardless of the harm they cause to the nation.

Those lies are systemic and tend to follow certain patterns:

- Those who lie tend to hold power, and have a self-interest in their lies. So they tend to hide the mechanisms of power they use to control the common people. They protect systems of power, sacrificing individuals even entire races, because systems of energy/information control social organisms.

- Those who lie deny the basic methods of truthness of the Universe. They do so denying the way the Universe 'causes' reality, through multiple causes. Instead myth makers create 'ceteris paribus', single causes to each Universal event; and/or use a single language to study History and Economics. They prefer mathematical languages that most people do not understand, and make humans abstract species. In this manner they can manipulate people without responsibility.

Further on since most social actions are performed by verbal speakers, who act through verbal thoughts, the use of mathematics hides the mechanisms of social power based in words. And vice versa, verbal explanations of monetary systems of power, hide the digital equations that control the economical behavior of company-mothers and other economical factors.

In the Universe, reality is based in the confluence of many causes, that create reality, and can be perceived with many languages. Specially social reality that takes place by the concerted actions of multiple actors, consumers, company-mothers, government, machines that influence human actions, etc.

- Those who lie tend to lie to favor their point of view, and hide what they did wrong; so they tend to lie specially about their fields of work and cultures.

- Those who lie tend to invent alternative ideas to cheat you, ideas that seem to make you prosper and happy, ideas called myths. In simple words, the myth is a lie, which substitutes the truth, with lies that make you happy... Myths take you for a sucker...

- To do so, the myth-makers try to lower your capacity to reason, expressing the myths in infantile, dramatic ways. They lower the logic content of the word, with all the methods explained above: single causes, provoking fear, using dogmas and religious postulates without prove, appealing to your heart, that cannot see, that has no lucidity and awareness, and can be cheated much easier with emotions. If they talk about temporal facts the main facts of history and economics for which verbal thought is superior they use images or mathematical statistics. So economics is based in images, and history has become illustrated by Hollywood films and photographs.

We could systematize all those logic ways of lying about the past, in a 'concept', the concept of fiction. The basic tool people in power use to cheat citizens... and provoke the extinction of social organisms.

Fiction: Organisms die in his third age when no longer follow the information of their nervous systems

The myth, fiction is any of the multiple, possible distorted mirrors of reality, we can create with words. Unlike the true-image, which is clear, and harmonic, which is self-evident, fiction is a distortion, able to cheat the believer, providing alternative ideas to the mind.

Fiction is not entertainment, but a fundamental sickness of any social organism, since it deactivates the capacity of the ruling network of the organism, the nervous/informative network to guide and cause survival actions in the cell of the organism. An organism that does not believe the informative messages of its social system, in the case of history the verbal messages of their social brain, is not a working organism. It is an easy prey of the environment, that no longer is serious about survival, and takes seriously his existence. Human organisms have always been ruled by serious people, who tried to make the organisms survive. It is only in the XX century, due to the massive degradation of verbal information caused by metal-minds, by TVs, radios, and other fictional machines, when our societies have abandoned reality, and no longer work as organisms, no longer accept verbal mandates, ethic mandates of survival.

This only means that our societies are entering the age of extinction, the third age of all organism, when the nervous/informative systems are no longer functioning properly. Such is indeed the meaning of death: social cells no longer obey the organic mind, the informative network of the society, which collapses. Then the individual social cells become disorganized and become preyed by other organisms who do believe their informative system. In the case of societies, human organisms re today disorganized by the sickness of fiction, of metal-minds, that only vomit false ideas about history and economics. This has a purpose: to make humans victims of company-mothers that reproduce machines and obey a new language of power, digital information, monetary networks that produce machines and evolve the ecosystem of machines and destroy the human ecosystem.

The chances of survival of History have diminished today as metal-minds destroy the capacity of words to be obeyed, to provoke actions, by creating a constant noise of verbal fiction. Indeed, fiction is the 'big brother' of modern days. By creating multiple fictional ideas, metal-minds, Hollywood, has invented the fundamental method of deactivation of human social organisms: the disbelief on human words. Today people cannot take seriously human orders, because for each non-fictional human orders, a horde of writers, novelists, film-makers, and singers, talk about useless concepts to life, distort reality, and have created finally a new type of human being, the neo-Paleolithic man, a primitive man, individualistic, without social compromise, that no longer believes in social, human orders.

Such subtle way in which machines of information and company-mothers who care only for machines, not for human beings, confuse the human mind has proved enormously effective. Today people do not become motivated by social, real problems. They prefer to see a fictional world, and that is indeed the meaning of the third age: as the extinction of an organism advances, the cells become disorganized, no longer obey the orders of the nervous system, cancers appear, cells change position, and no longer work together. The organism becomes disorganized because nervous orders no longer are believed by cells. In the muscles the slow and fast cells gather into two different groups, and the muscle does not work together. In the body the fat moves away and hangs around. The deformation of the structures of any social organisms is death. And death is the third age caused by the deactivation of the nervous system.

In history we talk of the Human baroque, when no longer men obey their biological language, no longer believe in words.

The world of fiction makes those actors and film makers, those journalists and politicians who have become slaves of metal-communicators, and indifferent to humans survival social truths, as guilty of our extinction, as weapons and robots will be.

They were the brain of mankind, and they have abandoned mankind and confused mankind with lies against our survival.

How to avoid myths. The bio-logical and linguistic method

Against myths it is necessary to have the right amount of information, and to know the laws that rule the Organisms of the Universe. In this manner by adjusting information to the proved facts and models of reality, to the Laws of the Universe, we will know if that information is correct, or not.

Indeed. The laws, the truths that rule the Universe apply to all the events and species of that Universe. Why? Because as we said before, the laws of the Universe have only a penalty: death by extinction. Those who do not understand such laws, and act against them, become extinct. And then their false truths and actions disappear. They are not. And things which are not are not truth.

In that sense the only truth which is absolute is the law of existence, a law that also applies to languages and truths.

Which closes our argument on why social truths exist:

An organic system which is ill-designed, is not efficient and it will become extinct by the many sickness that affect ill-designed organisms. In history by revolution, by war, or conquered by a better designed social nation.

So only organisms who are efficient, whose brain-systems of information and truth, are correct, last.

Otherwise they will not exist and the ideological lies that guided the information and acts of the society will cease to exist.

For all those reasons non-fiction, sacred verbal art, has been so important in all healthy organisms of history. For all those reasons the present age of fiction and despise for human ethics and aesthetics means the probable destruction of our civilization, as it happened in the past in other baroque ages of cultures.