POINTS WITH PARTS : THE ORGANIC UNITS OF THE UNIVERSE.
Mathematical languages simplify organisms into abstract points. Mathematics simplify reality. How they do it? Making each organism of the Universe a point, and putting them all together into an abstract graph called the Cartesian Space. We cannot though know all the information of reality with a single language, a simplified mirror that our mind puts on the Universe. In that sense the scientific method, the mathematical method, due to the simplicity of mathematics as a language, has created false dogmas about what reality is, that handicap enormously our knowledge of the Universe. Take the case of Mr. Einstein's famous Relativity postulate: "the speed of light is the maximum speed of the Universe". It has been proved experimentally false, and yet, scientists still believe on that dogma because it is such a beautiful, mathematical, simple explanation, that Mr. Einstein's time-space theory should be truth... Doesn't matter it is not. It is mathematical and beautiful and simple, and those are the 3 repeated dogmas that according to the 'religious spirit of science', are needed to be right. We are more concerned however with another fundamental error of Einstein: his understanding of the Universe as a space-time continuum, an error caused by the fact that in mathematics a plane of space is not made of points with volume, but of abstract points without volume. In reality however all what exists when observed in detail, is made of discontinuous points with volume. If you look at a table in detail you will see discontinuous points called molecules, made of discontinuous points called atoms, made of discontinuous points called protons and electrons, made of discontinuous points called photons, made of discontinuous points called Plank Quanta. And that minimal scale of smaller, discontinuous points with volume, with dimension, is what we call the Organic point, the first Unit of In-form-ation, of form in the Universe.. The error of Euclid->Descartes->Einstein In mathematical terms, all starts with zero, the point, and as all starts with zero we have to wonder what zero is. Yet i n abstract mathematics zero is nothing. It does not exist, as it is defined an object without breath. Such Abstract Universe if it were truth, would not exist, would not have volume as a sum of no breaths have no breath. So we find as in the case of the Big Bang that the entire Western Mathematical tradition is based in a logic error, we do have to correct to understand properly reality. What is then zero, the first point? In reality zero is something, a sphere, a Universal organism, the first form of the Universe, of any Universe, the first spherical form with in-form-ation. So beyond Abstract mathematics in organic Mathematics we define any, point as an organism, as a "organic point", a "point with parts". In the Universe of space-time discontinuity, all points enclose within themselves, a organic space, and all points have an external, cyclical form, that separates the Organism from the external world. And so the Universe becomes the sum of all the discontinuous "Points with parts", that create the volume of reality we call the Universe. However abstract science does not see the Universe in those terms, as composed of organic regions, points with parts, made of spatial energy and temporal information. Instead science sees reality as an abstract space-time continuum, without organic properties, in which herds of organisms become simple numbers, without inner organic properties. This is however a defect of mathematical science, unable to grasp the organic properties of the Universe.
Mathematics
simplifies reality. How it does it? Making each organism of The Universe
a point, and putting them all into an abstract graph called Cartesian
Space. Points with parts: organisms of times Let
us consider the organic Universe as it is, made of points with a volume,
with inner parts, made of cycles of times, not as mathematics deform
it, reducing all its organisms to points without parts of an abstract
plane. The best way to describe that Universe is with Biological properties,
which regulate the behavior of the particles of that Universe. We talk
of "organicism" as the main biological
property of all Universal species. All organic species together create
a organic Universe of beings that communicate and share energy and information
among them. The postulates of non-Euclidean geometry. Organic points Einstein
discovered that the Space-Time Universe was relative, and it did not
follow the fifth mathematical postulate of Euclidean mathematics, but
rather the Mathematical laws of a new geometry called non-Euclidean
Mathematics, that uses a different fifth postulate. "Through a point external to a line only a parallel can cross". The
non-Euclidean mathematics said on their fifth postulate: What
this meant?
You
see, you can't fit really two parallels on an abstract point without
volume. So thought Euclid when he invented his postulate. Then it is easy to fit in any of those points infinite parallels:
Such
is indeed, the main difference between abstract mathematics and relativistic
mathematics, the mathematics of the real Universe. In relativistic mathematics
points hold several parallels because they are discontinuous [02] points
with inner volume. Each of those organic points can hold many 'real
parallels'.
In
the diagram we can see how, as we come closer to the point, the point
acquires breadth and grows. We cross from a microcosmic, simplified
"mathematical" perception to a macrocosmic,
complex, organic perception of the point with volume. The advantages of this way to make real mathematics are obvious: the concept of an organic point truly describes the real Universe. And it is proved by the experience of Relativity! It is not a fantasy, that cannot be proved, as the concept of an abstract point. Since 'something without breath, without dimension' is something that does not exist. Abstract points are fantasies. They are not real. Anything you draw will have a size, a dimension. Mathematical numbers and planes are herds of organic points When
we come closer to Non-Euclidean points on the sky, they become real
stars. If we see all the information that surrounds the star - its magnetic
fields, its flows of energy and information, its planets, its external
skin-like barrier, etc. those points probably look like some kind of
macro-organism. Such
is one of the many r=evolutions of knowledge you will find in this web,
based in the correction of the erroneous, abstract postulates of Euclidean
science. Points
tend to gather in waves which are lines of circular points that we shall
call strings of Times. And
planes gather themselves in topographic, relative, organic Universes,
relative parts of the Total Universe, in which organic points live,
communicate and show their organicism. Another prove of the existence of points with parts Of the many consequences of a Universe of points with parts we study in our web and books, we might consider a fundamental law of physics that now becomes self-evident due to the 'volume' natural to all points with parts of the Universe - the Principle of Complementarity wave-particle, that says: "All particles in displacement are associated to a wave". The
principle wave-particle becomes logical: since points are spheres, all
sphere-particles moving along a force of communication will be perceived
as a wave. We have in that sense to rewrite the second Non-Euclidean
postulate: "A line is a wave caused by a point-particle, moving
along a force-wave of energy or information":
Unification of quantic Physics and Relativity Perhaps
the most interesting field of study opened by the existence of points
with parts is the correction of a misleading, abstract concept that
tampers enormously the evolution of our knowledge of the Universe: the
concept of an abstract space-time continuum. This continuity is only
possible when points are abstract beings without volume. Yet in reality,
points have volume and form, and a membrane that separates them from
other points. This means that the Space-time is discontinuous. It is
quantic. Experience has proved it long ago (quantic physics, the 'foam'
structure of the sub-microscopic Universe). Yet some abstract scientists,
lacking a theoretical explanation still deny it. Now longer in a non-Euclidean
universe of points with parts. Further on discontinuous space-times
points . This introduces an equivalence of fundamental value to understand
the organicism of the Universe: the equivalence between
space and energy. The Simplicity Of Mathematics It is now clear that the loss of the internal parts of species, of their organic nature, caused by the Euclidean simplification of species as points without volume has created some errors that limit our knowledge of the biological, organic Universe: First abstract mathematics deny communication as the basis of Universal events. In reality what points-species do is to communicate forces which carry information and/or energy. Yet in mathematics, points are void and do not share -communicate- anything. So forces of communication and all particles studied with mathematics, also become abstract, mindless energy. The Universe becomes in this manner dead, mute, "scientific." As a result of that death of communication, the creation of many species of The Universe is not understood in organic terms, as a process of transfer of information and energy, but as a mechanical process. o
The denial of communication among species, denies social evolution
and promotes chaotic, destructive theories of The Universe. In a non-Euclidean
organic Reality of points with parts, species have internal organs of
information and energy, able to perceive each other with communication
forces. They organize themselves in social networks through social,
communicative evolution. Atoms share electrons to become molecules.
Molecules share atoms to become macromolecules. Macromolecules share
micro-molecules and organize cells. Cells share energy providing blood
and nervous information to become Bodies. Humans
share verbal information to become 'History'. In reality [not in Euclidean
mathematics] from microcosms to macrocosms, communicative
species, with will to act, in the limited Universe they perceive, organize
themselves into complex systems. Yet in Euclidean Sciences, despite
growing evidence that shows "all herds" interacting with each
other, this organic Reality becomes dead and chaotic. A
lot of consequences and causes are not perceived. We think often that
a single cause [ceteris paribus cause] is the only reason reality exists. o Science becomes then dogmatic, and arrogant, because single causes tend to create dogmatic truths, which are affirmed as postulates without real prove (only that single cause). The consequences of those dogmatic affirmations are a lot of scientific lies that could fill up an entire encyclopedia. For example biologists know that dinosaurs died probably because mammals, more evolved species, displaced them eating their eggs and offspring. Physicists know there was a rock falling on the skies that might have caused an ecological catastrophe. Now this secondary cause has become the main cause of the dinosaur disappearance... Why then mammals did not die? Why only the small dinosaurs, the reptiles of today, and those who put their eggs far away, the birds, survived (as in all processes of extinction that leave a trace of small species behind)? Problem is physicists know nothing about biology and so they prefer to stick to their single cause. In this manner scientists become specialists in single causes, and single disciplines, which become isolated from other disciplines, seen with suspicion by the arrogant single-minded scientist. Inter-disciplinary efforts such as those of this web, or our Historic-economical webs (www.bioeconomist.com) which truly explore all the causes of reality are disliked, seen as a menace to dogmatic, abstract scientist, because they show the shortcomings of the Scientific Method. Phenomena which cannot be expressed in simplistic mathematics no longer matter to science... So evolutionists, that use a verbal theory, are banned from Nobel prizes... The obsession for simplistic mathematics leaves entire fields of knowledge in which there are too many points in control of the event to calculate the outcome with mathematics, totally unexplained, where organic explanations could easily provide an enlightening answer. Such is the case of gravitational phenomena when more than 3 elements are involved, or the processes of Bio-History and Bio-Economics, that cannot be explained only with mathematics - fundamental sciences for mankind, still in a mythic state... o The non-existence of organic parts, the informative and energy organs of species, becomes an error of moral order. This error is fundamental to explain the extinctive capacity of science. "Minds" are converted by mathematics into abstract points without linguistic perception. The Universe then becomes physical, "material." Living species, languages, minds and forces of communication are ignored unless the talk 'in mathematics'. Only the Human Eye and the digital machine, and the space and time they perceive is accepted as real, and intelligent. o
Since mathematics is basically a spatial language (unlike words used
to measure temporal phenomena), space and its synonymous becomes the
only reality. Even Life is defined by Spatial science in terms of movement
and energy; instead of perception and intelligence, as old philosophers
used to define it. Life becomes energy, instead of information. The
Universe lost with abstract science its rational, tempo-logical nature,
and became spatial energy. Space, force, no longer time, perception,
mattered. Energy no longer logic-intelligence, became the right thing
to be because still, inner virtual worlds had disappeared from the graph
of Euclidean and Cartesian scientists. |