The existential will of the mind: Top predators and the Galilean Paradox.

Species in the Universe try to stabilize a certain world and territory of perception, an organic space, or 'property' around them, controlling it through its forces of communication. So they care nothing for the 'outside reality'. Entities, from atoms to stars, are territorial, becoming the 'nucleus' of their forces and organic space. The Galilean Paradox is the fundamental cause-law of behavior of the Universe, the origin of Darwinian selective behavior, of territorial behavior, of preying behavior, common to all observed species that we extend as a probable hypothesis to all organic systems. So life is a quality that man extends to other species in proportion to his similarity and parallelism. We care for us, then for humans, perhaps for some animals... But other forms of life with different properties and behavior seem to us 'matter', mechanical beings without capacity to reproduce and evolve. And we 'ignore' them because we are too 'ignorant' to understand their behavior in living terms. Subjective knowledge is natural to the Universe, which is a quantic sum of relative, discontinuous, informative knots that perceive from their point of view a ‘World’, acting-reacting to it with the selfish purpose of accomplishing their own cycles of existence and ignoring the rest of the Universe. For that reason, man only considers from his anthropomorphic perspective, intelligent and organic those animals that perceive light, because he does not perceive the gravitational and atomic languages of ants and black holes. However, the fact that man only sees life properties in species similar to him is not a prove that there is no other forms of life and vegetative perception; but rather a defect of the mind of man, limited to his perception and sensorial evidence. What man does not perceive, he ignores. He considers the languages he does not understand, 'energy' instead of 'information' and his linguistic species, objects, non-perceptive forms. The movements, which do not follow the patterns of animal movements, are not 'self-generated' motion. The sizes (microcosms and macrocosms), which are not the human sizes, do not have organic nature.
We can imagine each world as a ‘quantic network’ of Fractal Organisms, connected by big strings of its specific energy within a ‘bigger network’ made of thinner strings, packed more densely in the ‘huge holes’ of the bigger network… as a fishnet floats on the sea of molecular water… And so the species of those worlds hardly interact among them, because they can’t perceive the other worlds. How much dark space an ideal Fractal Organism leaves outside its world? A simple calculus finds out that an ideal Fractal Organism has according to the ternary principle 3 external apertures through its membrane, itself made of 3 elements. So an ideal ‘Klein disk’ with a pi, 3.14 diameter, will have 3 quantic obscure parts in the membrane with 0.14 openings. Which in percentage means 96% of its surface is a ternary membrane that doesn’t let information to penetrate the point and a 4% are holes through which it sees the Universe. The prove of that illogic law came recently when we measured the gravitational world which is 96% of reality we do not see, while our Fractal Organisms of radiant matter perceive a 4% of reality, the light world .So the Universe extends much further than our tiny mind-world. Yet in the same way that an ant only sees a small chemical world but surely thinks the anthill is the center of the world, man has a small light world compared to the gravitational world. Thus light-space, the human world is only 4% of the total information that exists in the Universe, which is made of gravitational forces and dark matter that our brains cannot perceive. So it seems that what is ‘not very intelligent’ is the mind of man, that is almost blind to the Universe.
I rather think like Schopenhauer that we are ‘a wet spot on the surface of a tiny planet’. Indeed, our mind is a mere electronic ghost, compared to the gravitational mind of Black hole that perceives 96% more reality and acts as the top predator form of its galactic territory, he uses to absorb energy, information, move and ‘exist’, controlling, organizing, shaping and reproducing its stars.
Thus the reality humans see is not reality. It is our mind; a series of electric potentials, created by our atomic sp-electronic orbitals that absorb light and its 4 dimensions . Hence all what you see and appears to you as real is a reflection of those 4 dimensions of light space-time that your mind further elaborates into colors and forms. The rest is ‘dark space’, the 96% of reality. So any theory of reality has to explain why we exist in that virtual, subjective, diffeomorphic world the mind ‘creates’ with light-space, different according to Relativity, to all other diffeomorphic minds of the Universe we cannot perceive, as we only see the hardware of the brain, a mass of undifferentiated grey matter. Yet since the human mind is biological, the ‘reality’ we see is constructed according to a biological reason: survival, the desire to exist by transforming and selecting information in a way that allows us to act-react intelligently in the Universe. Mechanism cannot explain reality because it departs from ‘naïve realism’, the belief that we perceive directly reality not as a by-product of the biological evolution of the mind. Hence it eliminates the biological, linguistic and organic elements embedded in the reality it observes created by the survival will of the mind.
It is in that sense surprising the misunderstanding that the work of Descartes, the supposed father of mechanism, had among his ‘disciples’, since Descartes went far deeper along the path of this book in his interpretation of the mind. In fact, in his work, ‘The discourse’ he was the first to acknowledge the duality between the linguistic mind that creates a mathematical, abstract image of space-time, his Cartesian frame of reference, which he equalled rightly with ‘The World’, that is the subjective part of reality or ‘light space’ the human mind scans; Vs the objective, physical Universe made according to Descartes of quantic, spatial extensions that flew into cyclical whirlpools, the exact morphological definition we have made of spatial forces that flux into temporal cycles or ‘minds’. Unfortunately his ‘students’, the scientists that use his Cartesian frame, forgot that distinction and adopted the ‘naïve realism’ of mechanic ideologies based in the false tautology between ‘what we see’ and ‘what it is’.
What we see is a biological function called the mind that selects information on reality to enhance our survival. ‘Existence’ becomes in this manner the ultimate why of Reality, which Quantic Space-Time Theory explains. In philosophical terms, we talk of a process of ‘vegetative, subconscious perception’, as Leibniz did, differentiating it from ‘aperception’, the consciousness of perceiving. Which means that in most cases there is no perception of the ‘self’ that processes information . On the other hand perception goes beyond a mechanical action -reaction to information, as it is guided by the ‘existential need’ of the being or the creator of the being (as in chips, where the will to perceive is human). Informative perception could be considered similar to the vegetative soul of Aristotle, since it moves any entity of the Universe in a way that tends to improve its chances of survival. As Aristotle and Leibniz rightly understood, all Fractal Organisms that Leibniz called ‘monads’ perceive subconsciously, but very few perceive or go beyond the vegetative state. Yet on my opinion, as Leibniz rightly pointed out, most human beings act also as subconscious beings, obeying laws and work instructions in a way not very different from an ‘informative machine’. Obviously we are anthropomorphic beings, which believe to be the ‘free’ center of the Universe, but recent experiments have found that in man actions happen before thoughts decide to make those actions. Thus men act subconsciously and the free mind merely modulates and self-reflects 'a posteriori' on those actions as Quantic Spaces-Times has always contended, considering that the ‘existential will’ is the same in any form of the Universe. What man ads is a degree of self-reflection, which latter modulates his actions. Yet all species absorb energy and shape an informative cycle that often guides its energetic reaction . Which is only possible if the point extracts information, reacting in a subconscious, vegetative manner to that information, in a way it maximizes its ‘survival instincts’.
Even quantic, physical particles choose the most convenient paths for their survival as waves or particles . So it seems that all knots of information, even electrons, have a degree of vegetative perception in its relative plane of space-time existence, where its quantic actions take place that goes beyond the mechanical action . Obviously a ‘chair’ doesn’t perceive or becomes informed in any manner once it has been constructed by the external agent to which it belongs as a quantic part of its organic territory, but at the molecular level there are constant quantic actions-reactions and so its molecules should have a certain degree of informative perception that allow them to exist.
Though most of those systems are not ‘conscious’ of the energy and information they process, all of them act-react to the Universe, not in a mechanical way but in an organic, biological manner, making their parts act together as a whole with the best survival strategies, selected by the obvious penalty of the Game of Existence and Extinction: species whose spatial structure is not geometrically efficient with 3 Non-AE zonal regions of energy, information and reproduction cannot properly function in time, feeding on energy, processing information and reproducing. And so they become extinct. Thus, only those forms that obey the laws of space and time survive and keep making ‘real’ those laws into the future. For that reason, all systems are reproduced internally or externally by more complex systems, in as much as things that do not reproduce or repeat themselves become extinct when their energy and information is exhausted. So we talk of 3 basic ‘organic cycles’ common to all individual quantic fields of space-time: energy, information and reproduction. For example, a machine does not perceive but it processes information. It does not reproduce but it plays an informative or energetic role, which makes it symbiotic to humans that reproduce it. And so humans are the ‘organic why’ of its existence, because if the machines were not useful to an organic being like man is, they could not exist. We find organic properties even among the most ‘mechanic’ objects because organic systems, made of multiple quantic, interconnected pieces (herds, waves, organisms and societies) that exist or act mechanically in an organic manner as part of complex networks, survive better than individual, disconnected forms whose inner parts are not organic and harmonic in form and function, which become extinct. So the ultimate truth about reality is ‘organic existence, communication, interconnection’: The Universe becomes efficient, organic and harmonic as a consequence of the selective ‘existential game of survival and extinction’. For example, a planet that turns into an almost circular, harmonic, temporal orbit doesn’t fall into the sun and survives; on the other hand a comet that turns with a huge ellipse falls into the sun and becomes extinct. So as time goes by ‘mechanically’, most orbits become almost cyclical with a minimal elliptical form, because those forms survive better. The ‘existential game’ has selected a geometric, harmonic form based in its efficient survival. And so what matters to quantic space-time is that the selection of harmonic planets occurred. So the ultimate philosophy of quantic space-time sciences is a mixture of spatial geometry and biological vitalism. Both together create the game of ‘Existence Vs Extinction’, since only harmonic, symmetric forms that create in an efficient, multifunctional ‘organic structure’ with its quanta of energy and information, survive. Hence geometric vitalism becomes the Law of the Universe because those forms that do not show geometric vitalism become extinct and do not longer affect reality. It doesn’t matter that it happened in a mechanic way and the planet felt into a circular orbit by chance, as scientists believe; or that the planet consciously searched that orbit, through its uranium or crystalline, informative brain-nucleus that perceived the best gravitational paths around the sun as astrologers could think. Those are metaphysical questions, which Quantic space-time does not argue neither denies, as it is a law of quantic space-times that the discontinuity of the central informative knot of any Non-AE prevents us from understanding the way each species processes information. Minds exist but are invisible beyond their hardware. What is visible are the organic, survival, existential actions-reactions of those mind/brains and the ternary, parallel structure of all those languages and forces those minds use to scan the universe.
We won't enter here into a philosophical argument on the nature of linguistic perception, but rather assimilate it to the aseptic concept of 'information processing', which in the philosophical tradition responds to a ‘vegetative soul’ (Aristotle’s jargon) that processes information in order to improve his survival. That ‘soul’, as Aristotle rightly explained, might be outside the informative system, as when a human being programs a computer. Then the computer has not vegetative soul but the human being does. He is the catalyst of the process of ‘perception’. So ultimately, there is always a ‘biological will’ or desire to feed on energy and information caused by a central knot, similar to Aristotle’s concept of infinite unmoved Gods, center and cause of the movement of their surrounding energy body. This fact is fairly proved from atoms to human beings, since both absorb electromagnetic information - despite the arrogance of those who believe in man and God as the only intelligent beings of the Universe. In that sense, science still drags on the core beliefs of the fathers of ‘mechanism’, which were, from Descartes to Newton, followers of anthropomorphic religions.