Organs of Perception transform energy into languages of Information, different for each brain species

How energy becomes information: Energy never dies.

The process of existence, and its arrows of organicism are intimately related, as they evolve into each other.

If the first act of a living organism is to feed, its second act is to transform that energy into information, and then perceive it. Energy never dies but transforms itself into information. In this manner feeding becomes information. The simplicity of the Universe is awesome. It should not surprise us. After all we are in a Universe with only 2 parameters. So from one energy, comes two, form, in-form-ation.

Information, the second substance of the Universe.

The Universe is made of two substances, energy and information. Both have opposite properties, and yet both attract and mix each other, in all kind of macro-organs of enery and information, that we call bodies and brains. If in the microcosmic organisms of atomic nature, information is seen always as a force, as we cannot easily study the microcosmic inner organs that process energy and information inside the atom, when we grow in size, the organism becomes visible, and we recognize an organ of information, and sensorial organs that absorb the forces of the external Universe. In this manner information translates from micro to macro sizes with its properties. What are those properties? Information is small, complex in form, cyclical, stored in time, more than in space, in logic dimensionality, in languages, made of very complex, very small, very fast systems of sharing diminute flows of energy, called in-form-ation.

Each language perceives a partial truth

But why there are brains that absorb tiny flows of energy with a lot of form, called in-form-ation?

As all in the game of existence, because to accumulate information helps you to survive, to locate energy and feed and continue the game of existence.

What information does is to offer an organism maps of the Universe, virtual worlds, complex representations of reality, with a lot of formal detail, that map out the Universe and helps the organism to survive. All organisms perceive and react to information in one or other manner, and we call that property of organic systems, perception.

The flows of energy that become information in the brains of organisms, cause the organism to react to the external universe. That is the second arrow of life.

After feeding, organisms transform energy into information and react organicly to that information.
Bear in mind though that information comes in many shapes and forces. So each brain perceives a different information, a different map of the Universe...

Truth and perception: multiple languages, multiple truths

If you smell a carrot you have a certain perception of the carrot, if you see it you have another perception, if you use a microscope you have a third perception, if you eat the carrot you have a fourth perception. Each perception is a relative truth on the existence of a mass of energy and information known as a carrot.
Yet you will only consider a 'scientific description' of the carrot, the numeric truths related to scientific measure; the photographs and light perception taken on the carrot with scientific instruments. However a rabbit does not need thescientific method of metal-instrumental evidence, to smell the carrot without seeing it. He knows through smelling information that the carrot is. Thanks to such information he will locate under the Earth a carrot, faster than a scientist. Smell is part of the truth of the carrot, and the rabbit is an intelligent thinker of carrots in smelling terms. If for the scientist the light image of the carrot is the carrot, for the rabbit the smell of the carrot is the carrot. He just has a different approach to knowledge. Yet neither of them has all the truth on the carrot, which only belongs to the carrot itself. For the same reason we say that light perception and scientific truths derived of measures taken with metal-instruments are only partial truths, partial languages of perception of the total Universe.
It seems proved that light space is only 1-10% of The Universe. That light only scans 1-10% of the total space, perhaps more than the nose of the rabbit , but still very little, to make the kind of arrogant statements that the scientific method makes. The rest is dark matter which exists and communicates with other forces. This implies we will never be able to know totally the Universe by the scientific method, which is like a blind 'smelling of the Universal carrot'.
The Universe is a mass of energy and information, which stores the truth only into its total self. You are the truth of yourself, and any perception of you will only be a linguistic approximation to your total truth- yourself.
Digital science however denies this, with an arrogance proper of inquisitions of thought. Since what we call the scientific method affirms that reality and evidence, total truth, comes from 'scientific' measure of distances and spaces, according to metal-eye machines that perceive space [telescopes today evolved into cameras] and metal-clock temporal meters [today evolved into computers]. All other languages of time and space [such as human verbs and eyes] and the worlds they might create, are not relevant to science. If anything, the error of subjective arrogance, proper of Middle Age religions, grew with science, that limits evidence of truth and existence, to beings that can be perceived and measured with metallic instruments, and clocks. Let's consider with a critical eye such approach to knowledge.Dark matter exists not only in the outskirt of Galaxies, but by mere logic, we have to postulate that dark matter exists here, around us. That there are many systems of communication that we do not perceive with light. Even within you, as acupuncture proves, there are structures of energy and information that cannot be 'seen'. After all we do not see gravitation and yet it regulates the movement of all masses.
So true knowledge would be a method of understanding the Universe, that would allow us to have strong, probable truths about the 90% of what it is not perceived by the scientific method, of light-clock evidence.
In a world of partial information, truths are always relative probabilities, guesses, approximations to Reality through a language with partial information. We conclude that the scientific method of 'total evidence', and all the statements of science in that path, are pure, naive arrogance of which metal scientists are so often guilty. One of the fathers of science, Mr. Kepler wrote in his book: 'I am writing a book to be read either now or by posterity, it matters not. It can wait a century for a reader, as God Himself has waited 6.000 years for a witness.' Yet the witness was not Mr. Kepler, self-appointed the only intelligence comparable to that of God=the Universe; but the clock and telescope of Mr. Kepler. One of many linguistic witnesses of the infinity of linguistic perceptors that the Universe hosts. The truths of Mr. Kepler, were mere measures of the rhythms of energy feeding (gravitational space-time deformation) by stars; not the absolute truths about stars. If you are an ant that sees men eating=deforming food everyday at 2 o' clock, in the refectory of your limited Universe; you might think men are automata, and you know all about men. Yet you just will be an ignorant ant. When Mr. Kepler and Mr. Newton saw how celestial bodies deform space-time energy into gravitational cycles with regularity, they displayed the same arrogance of judgment. Now we know that closer to the center of galaxies, where stars are more evolved, they have abnormal movements, maybe free. We know about stars - about the Universe - very little compared with what we ignore.
The conclusion is that truth is not the function of a single language, but the accumulation of perceptions with many languages, that inform us about the Universe. That no language is superior to other. A language creates perception, a map or virtual world that represents reality but it is not the true reality only the accumulation of languages, and perceptions brings us the absolute truth:

Partial, linguistic truths=Total Truth of the being

A form of knowledge as classic science based in a single language (mathematics) that cannot even acknowledge those linguistic limits to its inquire, is far more primitive in its quest of truth, that a theory of languages, that considers relativism of perception, and creates from that relativism, a wider theory of knowledge, based on the existence of multiple truths and minds, and ways of perceiving reality, one for each language of perception of The Universe.

A theory of Truth: the linguistic method

If we want to advance beyond the scientific method, or the smelling method or the verbal method, we rather start to explore the Universe with all the languages of man, and accept the existence of languages and minds beyond human perception that we cannot decode. Such knowledge requires also to use a different method of knowledge besides the scientific method. Since the scientific method is 'unidimensional', 'uni-linguistic' and accepts only mathematical truths. True knowledge however is by no means reduced to a single language as the scientific method is.
On the contrary in a linguistic method, we are obliged in the research of Universal Organisms, to use all languages and informations we can gather.
We see, and smell, and touch, and observe temporally with words the species of the Universe. We have many languages of perception besides mathematics.
So once we have gathered information with all those languages - including mathematics and the scientific method, perhaps the most important method of knowledge, that we do not reject but merely put in perspective - we can use the concept of analogy, and observe what all those informations and languages have in common. Only then we will have an analogic, probable truth, made with multiple informations about reality. We might call such wider method, the linguistic method.
The linguistic method searches for languages and virtual worlds - minds constructed with those languages. It compares and extracts common formal laws from all information, and temporal languages of perception. In this manner we advance a step deeper in our search of knowledge. Such linguistic vision of the Universe allow us to jump into a theory of languages as means of perception and communication between Universal species that share information and energy thanks to those languages. Now we will be exploring not only the language=virtual world of light [science], but also the fact that there are many different languages, that create many different virtual worlds, representation of the Universe, which in general have a purpose. The purpose of those languages=virtual worlds is to ensure the survival of the species which observes reality with that virtual world of perception.

Relativity of virtual worlds: minds

It is then clear what is perception: the knotting, the inner-form-ation of universal energy that becomes formed through the language, organized into shapes by a linguistic brain.
That brain perceives the form as energy goes through its centers of perception. You perceive as you see electronic images, made of light-energy, a computer perceives as electronic data made with electric energy flows through its center.
In the organic Universe, all knots of information, all spherical, cyclical brains perceive and trans-form energy. Each one uses a different language. That does not matter. Only the arrogance of man denies that a rabbit perceives the carrot with smell as well as we do with sight, or a computer does it in mathematical terms.
In the relative stillness, and focus of a brain, that acts as a linguistic mirror of reality, the language traces a reduced version of the Universe, and that mirror-image is perception.
Languages are living species, they perceive.
Even a computer is a perceptor of digital languages, that once awakened in a robot body will also move and have a second will of organicism , besides informative perception, and energy feeding.

The Galilean paradox

We could resume the nature of perception, in the Galilean Paradox main cause of behavior of Universal species. Every species considers himself the center of the Universe, in as much as it perceives from that Universe only a certain part of its information, processed by the mind and the limited informative languages of the species. In fact a mind is a Galilean paradox, what a physicist would call a 'quantic knot', or deformation of spatial energy into temporal information, into form, into a mind. You are a subjective knot that deforms reality from your point of view, from your frame of reference, from your ways of perceiving, and smelling and hearing reality. Reality is not your Galilean paradox; reality is something else, that you hardly understand. We call it the Galilean paradox precisely because modern science started when Galileo discovered without understanding it one of such paradoxes: the fact that the Earth and our mind feels the Earth fixed, as the center of a Universe turning around us, when in reality it is the Earth what moves around the sun. That paradox of perception never solved by Galileo, is the key to understand the Relativity of spatial, scientific knowledge, compared to the absoluteness of organicism and his laws and arrows.