The 5th postulate of Non-AE geometry affirms that through a point can cross infinite parallels.
When we interpret it in terms of illogic information it explains the nature of the mind.
18. The informative cycle and the ternary principle: brain, mind and Heads of organisms.
The first person to understand the existence of infinite parallel worlds and minds, as geometric knots of information was Leibniz in his Monadology. But since he ignored Non-AE geometry, could not properly quantize space and time and develop a theory of networks and minds that interact with te rest of the network Universe. It was thanks to the development of riemannian geometries and its organic quantization how finally we can grasp the subtle intelligence of Aristotle and Leibniz in their definition of a Universe of infinite unmoved minds and gods... What in Buddhist thought was called an Atman.
To understand perception we have to go back to the 5th postulate, which Einstein used to describe the curved nature of reality and in Quantic Spaces-Times theory defines the still nature of a mind… Informative perception is the most complex and fascinating of the 3±1 cycles of existence. And yet, it is the less understood of all of them. Indeed, in this limited book we cannot go into detail about all those cycles but the curious reader will find very good descriptions of the energetic, reproductive, social and generational cycles of most beings, albeit with ‘itifying expressions’. So if he wants to know about the reproduction of machines he can study the production equations of ‘company-mothers’, if he wants to know how crystals reproduce he can study the ‘repetition’ of its ‘cellular units’ etc. While if he wants to know the life existence of a Universe he can study its big-bang, big-crunch cycle. The study of the social properties of quantic particles is mathematized under the concept of a wave in Physics, a molecule in Chemistry and a herd in Biology. But the cycle of information, the first and last cycle of existence, which truly starts it all, as we first perceive and then energize and reproduce socially, is hardly understood. And yet illogic geometry formalizes that cycle through the 1st and 5th postulate that also open and close the structure of Quantic Spaces-Times theory, defining a mind as the ‘inner informative content of a Fractal Organism with parts…’ To analyse those informative cycles and minds, we will consider the methodology of the ternary principle studying:
- Max. E: The spatial, structural ‘membrane’ or energy of those cycles, the ‘hardware or brain’, made of physical, specialized quanta able to store information.
- Max. T: The temporal information of those cycles, tNon-AE logiche ‘software’ or ‘mind’, consisting on flows of linguistic forces that carry temporal energy.
- Ext: And the organic inter action of both, hardware and software, which those brains transform into information, creating together a brain-mind system that acts-reacts in the external Universe as the ‘Head’ of an organism that guides a body, maximizing the survival of that organism.
19. Beyond empirical reality. The Relativity of linguistic truths.
We don’t exist in the real Universe but within the world that our mind creates with the electromagnetic fluxes that come into our eye and brain through the senses. Hence to know ‘objectively’ reality we have to analyse the filters of perception, which affect both our senses and the electromagnetic instruments and ‘mathematical languages’ of science. Those filters establish clear differences between the objective truth and the virtual reality our mind constructs. For example, neither scientific instruments nor our mind perceive the gravitational forces that create the inner parts of quarks and masses, which appear to us as punctual particles because both scan only light-space and electromagnetism. But masses do exist. It is our mind what is limited. So only by studying the discontinuities of Non-AE geometry and the way a mind jumps over those discontinuities to extract a little bit of energy and information and ‘manufacture’ his image of reality, we can talk objectively about the Universe. In a Universe made of discontinuous worlds, filled with dark spaces invisible to empirical perception, such as gravitation, facts are never objective, absolute truths because we only have a limited, linguistic perception of them. All facts become translated into a language by a mind not only among humans but also among all kind of particles and forms that act-react to that Universe: gravitational masses, chemical ants; digital chips…
Empirical facts are reconstructed ‘theoretically’ by minds. Which means that to know how the ‘syntactic structure of a language’ interprets facts is as important as the empiric facts.
We don’t describe reality but how the human mind and its languages elaborated by electronic impulses created by the light we perceive: ‘And God said there is light, and the mind of man was’. So first light scans a very limited part of the Universe (a 4%); then it feeds your eye, where light creates your dimensions of space-time ; then electrons create even more complex realities, colors and forms with that light that becomes a quiet mental map, our world, a partial piece of reality. Since beyond that light World, there it seems to be a 96% of non-radiant space-time, constructed with gravitational forces, which might host other Worlds and other realities. Today the concept of a World within our mind has been fairly established by neurologists, though Physicists can’t easily accept it because it invalidates their arrogant pretension of ‘absolute measure’. Instead their ‘naïve realism’ affirms that ‘reality is’ and we see reality not our mind. That mechanic naïve dogmatism hinders our understanding of the Universe. Since the limits of empirical information imply that truth is a linguistic theory of reality.
20. Ternary, Universal grammar. The syntactic software of all minds.
And yet, even though each mind is different in the details, it is always a homologous organ of informative perception that observes the Universe. How can we prove it if we cannot see inside those minds? Again, as in many other complex questions brought about by the discontinuity of reality, we can infer the answer from the external observation of the actions-re actions of those points to informative flows, which is homologous; and analysing the external forces of temporal energy those Fractal Organisms process as a language, which show in all cases the same ternary structure.
We do not perceive reality but languages that carry very little energy and only a limited quantity of information about reality. Languages are informative seeds that minimize the content of ‘energy’ of a force, transforming it into still information within the hardware or brain of an organism.
Indeed, the main difference between the mind and the body are its opposite, informative and energetic properties. Since the main characteristic of a virtual, mental world is to be still, to be a fixed map in which moving temporal energy stops and creates form, in-form-ation. So:
Languages of information are also ‘Non-AE structures’, albeit reduced in spatial size. All languages are constructed with the same ternary Non-AE logic and so we talk of a ternary ‘Universal Grammar’ that describes the inner structure of linguistic sentences in the same manner the 3 regions of a Fractal Organism reflect the inner structure of all spatial forms and cycles. Further on since the function of all linguistic expressions is to translate those Universal events into a ‘reduced’ informative image their structure has to be parallel. Indeed, languages are 'synoptic mirrors' that each specific species uses to understand the actions of temporal energy performed by all the other beings of its ecosystem to act-react properly to those cycles and survive. So all languages have as those cycles, 3 phases or forms that in the linguistic jargon we call the ‘syntactic’ elements of the language that can reflect any action a certain being observes with its language of information:
Se:Spatial, energy element<Present action of temporal energy>Ti:Temporal, informative element
Thus we talk of a logic Universal Syntax based in the 3 dimensions of past, spatial energy; future, temporal information; and present actions of temporal energy, (considering the arrow of future, the arrow of the 3 ages of life that transforms energy into information, though death reverses that arrow).
For that reason, the Ternary Principle of illogic geometry and the space-time field equation, SE<=>ST, represents also the structure of all informative languages, becoming the syntax and 'ultimate logic' of the Universe, the language of all linguistic forces of temporal energy of the Universe. Since it can reflect any event or symbiotic form composed of spatial energy and temporal information. Let us consider some of those languages.
The Human verbal language.
The inner syntax of human verbal languages of Space/Time, spatial mathematics and temporal verbs, responds to the Ternary illogic Principle to reflect the ternary structure of the events and forms that interact with mankind. Thus verbal sentences relate informative subjects and objects, the energy of the subject, through ‘past, present and future’ verbs, that describe the ‘ actions’ of temporal energy of the informative subject over the energetic object with forms’, creating with a present sentence the ‘logic simultaneity’ of those 3 dimensions in the mind of the speaker:
Ti (subject) < verb >Se (object) (Verbal languages)
Because words are a temporal, informative language they allow a higher understanding of temporal logic; its multiple causality and the co-existence of past, present and future; better expressed with 3-dimensional verbs than numbers. For example, a person believes the ‘future’ exists with ‘certainty’ when he says ‘I’ll be gone tomorrow’. The verb has a present, a past and a future that co-exist together, reflecting the fact that certain events of the Universe are ‘programmed’ by the laws of existence and its dual arrows that we cannot breach. Or in other words when you are born you are dead a century latter because in Aristotle’s words, the potential fact of the future will be created by the essential fact that has already happened. Yet, since all perception is relative, all truth is a probability based in those limited perceptions. So the future is partially perceived as the logical outcome of the present, the past is partially perceived as we reconstruct the facts with the remains we find in the present, and the present is partially perceived by the limited senses and information we observe. What is then more truth, the past or the future? Depends on the predictability of the event and the remains of the past, which can be very misleading. For, example your death is far more real than my existence. Since ‘Luis Sancho’ the author of this book might no longer exist or be a pen name. But you will certainly die. Since, indeed we all are quantic, virtual ghosts of existence.
The mathematical language.
While mathematical equations relate 2 elements, a Y function (usually the temporal, future or informative variable) that acts as the synoptic language of an X polynomial (the spatial, physical reality) through an operand, the equivalent to the verb that describes the ‘ action’ or kind of relationship established between both variables, the Y-subject and the X-object:
The distinction between both sides of an equation, the informative, mental synoptic side and the physical reality is very important to full grasp the laws of physics. We already saw how Einstein, by choosing the synoptic, informative reality, the abstract space-time continuum as real, missed the fact that physical reality was the other side of the equation, the X-polynomial quantic collection of masses and energies. Scientists commit a lot of ‘conceptual errors’ because their abstract perception of those mathematical equations, given their synoptic nature and variety of connecting symbols. On the other hand that complexity allows mathematical equations to describe events made of many other events, far more complex than verbal sentences, which tend to be a sum of simple individual actions, which linguistics easily decompose into the ternary actions Universal Grammar. Thus a fundamental task of ‘Quantic Spaces-Times Grammar’ a sub-discipline of Quantic Spaces-Times theory, is to translate mathematical and physical laws, parameters, operand, constants and equations, to energy and time parameters, reducing those equations to a series of ternary grammatical sentences that ultimately show all mathematical laws as chains of cyclical action-re actions between spatial forces and temporal particles and the social organic systems they form . For example, each mathematical operandi defines a type of Universal cycle: +, å and ∫ are obvious symbols of social cycles that integrate together quantic elements into a whole. Yet since all operand has an inverse form, mathematics proves in this way the eternal balance between space and time actions. And so there are operandi for the opposite, disintegrating cycles: - and ∂. So once an equation becomes decomposed in multiple actions we observe that most of them express a static balance or flow of space and time quanta of the type f(e)=g(t), as a specific case of the SE<=>ST Quantic Spaces-Times equation, the ultimate why of those equations. For example, in V=S/T ‘speed’ shows an external or translation change (fig.1.4), that relates a space and time parameter.
The Physical, linguistic forces.
If operandi are the key element of mathematical equations, the fundamental element of physical equations are the ‘constants of action’, which represent fixed relationships between the space and time parameters of a specific being. For example, in E=hv the constant of action, h is mixed with the temporal element, v, or frequency, whose inverse function is the temporal period. Thus we write, h= =Energy x Time (period), which explains in terms of spatial energy and temporal information the actions of any species of the quantum world, all of which are composed of a quantity of such h-minimal actions of ‘temporal energy’, the ‘relative cells’ (spatial, fixed perspective) or minimal events of that world (dynamic, temporal perspective).
Thus physical equations describe either a sum of complex cyclical actions performed by complex Fractal Organisms, which exchange fixed quantities of energy and information (temporal perspective), or the inner structure of those Fractal Organisms (spatial perspective), defined by certain proportions of energy and information called ‘Universal constants of action’, that gather in social cycles, SK, creating the different species of that Universe.
Those forces with fixed proportions of energy and information act as languages that exchange information particles also defined by inner constants of action. And so we distinguish 2 fundamental languages of information, the gravitational and visual languages defined by gravitational and electric constants that define both forces. Both can also be reduced to a ternary expression in which bidimensional space and bidimensional information interact through the force/language that transforms one into another, since they have the generic formula: F =(g or q) T(m or q)2/s2 which in Quantic Spaces-Times grammar writes as:
(Spatial distance)2<Proportionality Constant>(Informative charge or mass)2.
So when we go beyond the specific languages of man, the same dual or ternary Universal Syntax, the 'ultimate logic' of the Universe that proves reality as an active-reactive cyclical combination of 2 substances, applies. Yet humans perceive only electromagnetic forces that become visual languages. Gravitation is invisible to us and so it doesn’t act as a language among humans but only as an informative force that attracts and ‘forms’ quantic masses.
The visual language.
So we can only consider the informative codes of electromagnetic languages that we share with animal life and cameras, is based in a dual or ternary code that most species use to identify energy and information. So black is information and white is the energy, with the intermediate range of greys. While the 3 primary colors are red, the colour of energy, blue the colour of information and the intermediate green, exi, synonymous of reproduction and life. So red is the colour of high temperatures that show the inner movement=energy of atoms; the sun is red and meat is red because they give us energy; human societies define red as the colour of the 'energy classes of a social system' and it is the symbol of 'hot' cultures that appears in the Spanish flag and the preferred colour of males, the energetic sexual specialized form . While blue is the colour of quiet, cold information: Deep blue was the best informative computer; blue is the colour of the flags of all northern, cold nations except Canada; and it is the colour of fascism, preferred by the upper, informative classes. Finally green, the intermediate colour that mixes both, is the reproductive colour of life and plants, the colour preferred by women, the reproductive element of the couple.
22. The equation of the mind. The 5th postulate.
We can formalize the structure of a world-mind with its generic definition given by the 5th and last postulate of Non-EA geometry. In graph 4.18, a flux of forces creates a vortex that falls towards a central singularity in which the energy force is transformed into information, creating a linguistic, still image with a fixed content of spatial information, perceived and processed by the brain of the system as a synoptic mirror of the Universe, which allows the system to act-react in that Universe. Thus the 5th postulate of Non-AE illogic geometry defines any mind as the informative singularity or central region of a Fractal Organism that creates a virtual image of the Universe or ‘World’, limited to the information scanned by the forces it absorbs:
‘A mind is a point of temporal information in which parallel forces of spatial energy converge, creating a linguistic image of the Universe:
S e (Universe of temporal energy) x 0t (Point-Mind) = K (linguistic World of spatial information)’
Of the many sides of that 5th postulate we shall consider 2:
- The physical duality between mind and brain that makes possible for a mind to ‘stop’ a flux of temporal energy in movement into an informative still map, mind or virtual word.
- And the aberrations of perception the mind causes, creating the arrogant vision any species has of the Universe, in which he believes to occupy the central point.
23. The stillness of the informative mind Vs the movement of the body: Order Vs energy.
In the physical realm, besides our electronic minds there are gravitational minds, black holes and masses, which Einstein defined as foci of gravitational space:
‘Space=Energy is motion relative to a simultaneous frame of reference=a gravitational mind’
We added in italic the equivalent Quantic Spaces-Times concepts to those used by Einstein, who understood space as a moving energy warped by a mass, a frame of reference that ‘measures’ space-time. Yet Einstein was an abstract physicist, philosophically shy, and so he did not considered how a ‘mass’ can measure, an informative, ‘intelligent, mental action’.
Minds are focused, ‘Aristotelian Gods’, defined in his metaphysics as unmoved, intelligent brains around which energy flows and ‘bodies’ turn, as they feed with temporal energy the mind. Stillness is the nature of perception. Even if reality is a moving quantic soup, your eye is not out of focus because its virtual images are still, like the pictures of a film that stops in front of the camera. Both images, in the eye and the camera, only move and change when you blink your eyes or the camera closes its window, stopping their perception. . Then it rests in darkness as the body makes the brain jump to another place… Thus perception is also quantic, a stop and go process that focuses a still image with the senses and then process that information into a quantic thought while the senses are closed and the energy body moves the mind. In the human case that quantic rhythm lasts a second, our ‘dharma’ of relative present-existence in which simultaneously we create a still mental image of the Universe. So each second our quantic, informative mind closes a mental, cyclical action:
Cycles of temporal energy=>sensorial in-forma-tion =>Brain-clock of time.
An informative brain or temporal clock, acts as a mirror of the Universe, portraying the quantic, cyclical actions of time-space, performed by multiple species. Those actions are communicated to the brain region by certain forces/languages, electromagnetism or gravitation, atomic smells, sound waves, etc. that the brain reconstructs into an image that imitates those cyclical actions with inner, still in-form-ations. In physical terms that stillness is equivalent to coldness, since temperature is a parameter of movement. For example, the black hole has a temperature close to 0 k, which means that it exists in relative stillness, with perfect order. Since it might perceive an image made with bosonic, gravitational quanta perfectly focused, with minimal fluctuation. So we suppose by illogic parallelism, that the virtual world that happens in the black hole at zero temperature and zero movement is a linguistic mirror of the galactic Universe.
24. The hardware. Physical brains: the vortex equation and the Pauli Exclusion Principle.
If the software, the language and of all relative minds is homologous, the hardware, the brain should also have an homologous structure and indeed it does. Since all minds transform moving energy into information and share the properties of information: stillness, quantification, small size and cyclical form. Since any mass or charge is, according to Cyclical Relativity , a ‘cyclical vortex of forces’, it is easy to understand them by homology with the structure of bigger physical vortices like a hurricane. Those vortices are defined by a paradoxical equation: VoxRo=K: the forces of the vortex accelerate towards its center till at point Ro they become quiet, creating within the inner radius a quiet ‘eye-brain’ that transforms the energy into still information. In a black hole the inner quiet region is called the Schwarzchild Radius; in a man it is the eye that stops light when it collides with the electrons of the retina and extracts its information, in a camera a similar process creates a still image.
All vortices have in fact a ternary structure as Fractal Organisms:
- Max. Space: The external frontier is the discontinuous membrane of the vortex.
- E/T: The inner region is the cyclical vortex-body of increasing speed, Vo=E/T.
- Max. T: The inner, still brain, or singularity beyond the Ro-radius, where the flow of forces of temporal energy becomes a quantic mind through a stop and go process.
How a physical, electromagnetic or gravitational mind like an eye or a black hole, a knot constructed with the quantic information of those forces, perceives a virtual world? The inner singularity, where the mind appears is a relative brain (a charge, a mass, a biological brain) that creates a still world of information with the forces it absorbs, once they cross the ‘Ro-horizon’. Then the forces enter a Belgrami hemisphere, changing its rotational direction perpendicularly. The peculiar properties of the Non-Euclidean Belgrami cone are revealing of what happens inside that Ro horizon : the particles of temporal energy that rotate around the vortex suffers a change of coordinates from, planar, energetic coordinates to perpendicular, height coordinates as it climbs the tall dimension of the cone. Further on those particles show in their accelerating upward rotation all the possible perspectives on its form to the central singularity that always ‘perceives’ the information of those particles in a symmetric focus, no matter how much it turns the particle around the vortex. Since the tangential distance between the center of the Belgrami cone and any point of the cone is always the same. Thus, an observer in the center of the cone will perceive the form that turns around it in a series of quantic perspectives, as we observe a ‘movie’ in a series of quantic photograms.
In physical terms we say that, the force splits its energy and information dimensions, perpendicularly to the rotational vortex. At that point therotating particles of the field of force explode, and the energy dimension is emitted perpendicularly to the rotational plane; while the information leaks slowly, penetrating into the still mind or ‘vortex center’ in the other perpendicular direction. In fig. 4.11 we see those 3 perpendicular directions that also happen in any electromagnetic vortex and are known as the ‘hand arrows’. They are evident in any mass or black hole, where beyond the Ro-horizon, the particles divide into a perpendicular jet of energetic electromagnetic radiation, and a dimension of time that leaks towards the interior of the black hole. Though we do not see within the mass, charge or black hole of zero-still temperature we know it absorbs ‘temporal information’. So we imagine that in all physical vortices temporal energy is processed by the organic interior, partially transformed into information and expelled through the poles. The generic model is given by Non-AE mathematics . The homologous human brain-eye system is easier to analyse: the eye sphere reflects light energy (white colour), the iris absorbs information that ‘stops’ in the cells and becomes transformed into electronic impulses. So the energy of light is deviated and its information translated.
The physical reality with its omnipresent, similar vortices from hurricanes to black holes ; from vibrating atoms to electrons that emit or absorb photons shows the perpendicular, Darwinian mechanism of transformation of temporal energy ‘killed’ and split into informative time and energy flows that happen to all forces that feed a bigger perceptive center. It is also obvious in the transformation particles suffer in its parameters, when coming to a black hole vortex. They accelerate close to the speed of light, transforming its energy into time parameters, according to the Lorenz Transformations, and finally split its energy and information perpendicularly. Further on we know masses and charges act-react to the temporal information they receive. For example, a charge changes its spin after receiving a photon or changes its rotation when it enters a magnetic field.
Yet the most clear prove of the ‘perceptive’ nature of those vortices is the Pauli’s Principle of Exclusion. Long ago a physicist called Pauli received a Nobel Prize for his ‘Exclusion Principle’ that demonstrated something in appearance obvious: 2 particles cannot occupy the same space, except light and gravitation, whose photons and theoretical particles, gravitons, can occupy the same place or center of perception till a limit given by an immense amount called the density of Planck (or Max. density of information of the Universe). Even certain atoms (called Bose condensates) when they are equal and very ordered without vibration, near 0 K temperatures, can fusion into a point. So they can become the still pixels of a virtual image that occupies a relative zero space-time.
Those bosons form in the center of a mental point a virtual map of the Universe, done by the accumulation of quanta of information in that central singularity, as it happens in a crystal or an eye and probably by a quark that forms an electromagnetic or gravitational image of the Universe. Further on, bigger minds, black holes, seem to be made by accumulation of ‘bosonic quarks’ that carry a huge amount of mass-information. So they can form even more complex images as shown in its equations that prove 2 fascinating facts: that the black hole has 5 dimensions that it transforms its spatial parameters into pure, perpendicular, time parameters .
So quarks and black holes are singularities, ‘minds’ that have the geometry of the central Belgrami cone , the information region of a non-EA point.
Bose atoms, gravitons or photons in the ultracold surface of those singularities decelerate at hyper slow speeds and acquire an extraordinary formal order as pixels of virtual minds. What is then the most perfect, densest mind of the Universe? Probably the big-bang singularity, which seemed to be a black hole, made of bosonic quarks accumulated till reaching the enormous Planck’s density of 1096 kg/m3 . It is also called the “constant of God” or maximum density of logic in-form-ation the vacuum energy can hold, curve and form into what probably was the mind of a previous Universe that ‘died’ and exploded, disintegrating that information back into energy and starting a new son-Universe, as some spiders die to become consumed by their new babies, in a process we have named the ‘Oedipus Paradox’ .
Those quiet brains are the singularities of Non-AE points that cause the arrow of informative order in the Universe, balancing its arrow of disorder and energy. Even physicists that do not recognize them philosophically have postulated them empirically in their quantic equations. Since they ‘renormalize’ the central singularities of masses and charges as points with zero speed. Indeed, those physical knots are still points that define charges and masses as ‘Non-AE bosonic minds’. The paradoxical, illogic laws of any physical vortex prove that such systems are not only biological, but probably they are also physical. Since in a physical vortex, charge or mass, the central zone is a zero point of perfect stillness, which in crystals creates an image by accumulation of so-called bosonic forces , defined precisely as parallel particles that can accumulate, according to the Pauli Principle in a single point of time .Hence gravitational and electromagnetic bosons can create in a Fractal Organism or relative brain of condensed information a virtual image of the entire Universe as light does in the human electronic eye or in a camera; electrons do in a brain and probably gravitational forces do in masses and black holes.
So we define easily a physical mind as an energy flow that is transformed into information, in a knot of informative time or future point that creates in its interior with those flows of energy an image of the Universe or World. In terms of the space/time inversion and its opposite properties the equation of the mind means that: ‘A point of time or mind, has infinite virtual spaces within it: SE>T’. Since each line of energy, each photon of light, each pixel, each boson, is a piece of virtual space, e, that has been reflected by a real being and so it carries information about the being, which is a piece of the universal infinite tapestry of organic beings that put together shape the Universe.
Thus, from the perspective of the mind, the center of any relative quantic world, we distinguish, according to the Ternary Principle, 3 elements:
- Max.T: The mind itself, a relative still point or informative center.
- E=T: The body, its primary energy that moves the mind point.
- Max.E: The world or ecosystem, the part of the external Universe the mind scans.
Your eye-point, the gravitational-point of the black hole, the chemical brain of the ant, the electronic chip of a computer are the respective brains or ‘points with parts’ of their relative bodies, their organic, moving systems, the human being, the galaxy, the ant-hill, the machine. While the Earth, the Gravitational Universe, the anthill territory and the working place of the machine are their relative worlds.
25. The Galilean Paradox. The relative intelligence of the human mind.
Languages of temporal energy are the key factor in the survival of any species that somehow ‘understand’ them to be able to act-react in the existential Universe. What those languages do through their Universal syntax is to resume reality, extracting the most relevant information about the world needed by each species. The mind extracts with those forces it absorbs. Yet it is a min. volume of information, which creates a linguistic map, virtual mirror of the Universe. But the mind confuses the total reality with its world map, the infinite Universe with a relative World drawn with the minimal flows of temporal energy that come together into that mental quantic point. We call that paradox of perception, the Galilean Paradox, since the most clear example is the fact that we think the Earth is the center of the Universe when it is not, as Galileo discovered:
‘Every perceptive species or informative point of view thinks it is the center of the Universe by confusing it with its virtual world, the part of the Universe that its informative languages scan.’
The Galilean Paradox is a physical paradox that becomes the basis of selfish, self-centered, psychological behaviour. Since a mind, despite being infinitesimal compared to the Universe, believes to be also infinite, in as much as all what it perceives comes towards its ‘mind’, its ‘knot of quantic information’ that seems the center of that Universe, but is only the center of an infinitesimal volume of quantic information that his eyes scans out of the zillions of bits that exist in the Universe.
Hence, humans think they are the center of the Universe. And so we think we make ‘Universal Pictures’ and our intellectual leaders are ‘Universal minds’. Yet all truths are linguistic truths that other point of view might find false. Human eyes see the Earth still; yet Galileo proved that the Earth moves from the point of view of the Sun. What is then truth, the Human-Earth's still point of view, or the Sun's point of view? Both things. And that is the paradox: reality is always translated by a mind, which deforms it through the syntax of the languages/forces it uses to perceive it. The Earth's species see themselves as still point of views, center of their World, the Earth. Yet the Sun places the Earth as a satellite, used to stabilize its gravitational space-time field. So both truths are possible because the Earth and the Sun are self-centered beings that construct 2 different worlds based on 2 different informative languages. Since each language and being of the Universe creates different maps and virtual worlds of reality and acts-reacts, transforming that reality according to its selfish survival needs. Thus, there are infinite, relativistic, parallel Worlds, one for each language and species that measures informations and energies, trying to create with them cyclical actions that position their diffeomorphic point of view in the center of the Universe.