Unification Theory: The Universe is a Fractal Organism of Spacial Energy and Temporal Information  

TOP PREDATORS: SELECTION OF OF LANGUAGES

Informative species control the Universe


Brains and languages, the survival of the fittest

In other pages of this web we have studied the different forms of energy and information that the Universe displays, and we have shown how each different species of the Universe, uses a different kind of energy and information, perceiving different virtual worlds. This raises an important question.
If the different brains of the Universe perceive that universe with different languages that store different information, which laws order them, which laws decide what is a better mind, what mind will impose its vision of the universe?
The Laws of Evolution, the fight of existence: Each mind confronts its vision of the Universe, with other minds, and those minds which store better information, are able to react faster in that Universe, and survive.
So we could in fact talk of a true ladder of power and organization in the Universe, among all its species based in the languages they speak.
We then affirm that species with better, more informative, faster languages=virtual worlds, who scan more the Universe, are survival species, whose virtual worlds are selected, since they kill less efficient species of virtual worlds. We will talk of top predator languages=virtual worlds that create top predator species.
Such top predator linguistic species use simpler species, as food=energy, or as working tools of his relative kingdom - as man does with 'living property', or DNA with more simple carbohydrates, or ants with lesser insects.
So we can build a general theory of selection of species, now based not only on external efficiency of Bodies, [Darwinian evolution], but also on internal efficiency based in linguistic complexity. It is not the body but mainly the language-brain, the information system of the organism, what determines a top predator organism, a survival organism.
The most complex languages make species like man survive other lesser thinking species such as lions. Survival and extinction of efficient languages of communication, becomes then the essence of the Living Universe, made of linguistic minds, that control efficient 'territories' or 'bodies'.
For example, we know that a planet survives better than a comet because he has a higher command of gravitational forces of communication, a better form in his movement around the star. The irregular orbit of the comet allows the star to capture and 'feed-dissolve' the form of the comet into her form. We know that a carbon atom rules extended surfaces of other Atoms , because he has more 'electronic forces of communication' - four valences. Man survives better than lions, because his mind is more complex, and so he can control and manipulate more extended territories.
It is necessary to accept a Universe where many other species besides man have a linguistic mind and do perceive virtual worlds, mirrors of the Universe, built with relative, linguistic information.
Such linguistic species, from atoms that perceive gravitation to plants that perceive chemistry in their roots, are not dead. We just don't decode the same information they do.
So we will consider a Universe where stars see space-times of gravitation. A Universe where life is perceptive, even metal-atoms might be perceptive in the future [chip perception].
In that Universe many species communicate, and act-react to communication, even if man does not notice, or accepts their acts of communication as 'living properties'.
We cannot perceive the entire truth=existence of other organisms; but even if we cannot see through the eye-worlds of planets or stars, or ants, we can observe externally the movements and actions of those other organic minds, and we can try to establish the laws that order and regulate such multiplicity of Brains that explore the Universe.
Of all those laws, the absolute law is the fight between minds and the bodies their guide for energy of existence, and control of the ecosystem in which they live.

The evolution of top predator species on Earth. Biological radiations

In evolution we see how the evolution of a Top Predator informative organ triggers a biological radiation (massive reproduction [10]) of the new species, which replaces previous ones. This happens because information controls energy. When the ability to perceive light appeared, in the first cephalopods, it triggered off the massive extinctions of the Cambric Period. Look at the squid. The first eye-world. See the intelligence of those eyes. In the squid the eye is the superior organ of perception [09]. The eye enabled them to become the master of their Universe. They hunted their enemies with a degree of perception that did not exist previously. We can imagine the ecosystem where the squid was probably born: the depths of the ocean, where bigger species of squid existed [over 10 meters long]; where they were undoubtedly a Top Predator. The light was dim. The first primitive cellular eyes had to look hard to see their environment and the prey they sought. When they came up to the surface they saw even more, and began to eliminate all lesser rivals. This caused the extinction of 90% of the creatures in the Cambric Period who had only their olfactory senses to negotiate their environment. The birth of a new organ of light perception brought the most massive wave of extinctions ever on the planet. They also brought the arrival of exoskeletons; only those with external protection could survive the eye of the hunter. It was a holocaust that diversified life: with cephalopods in the game the stakes of survival and extinction were increased. The life-death game was faster, the eye could see, spot and hunt much better.
Again, the game selected the best informative brains and energy Bodies , when it moved to land. First amphibian, then reptiles, finally mammals with a far better eye-brain system that reptiles. Today it seems to move again to machines of information based in light [Robots, computers, cameras].
Are those machines organic systems, able to process energy, information, and reproduce as other organisms? Indeed, they are. They just are now in the process of evolving those organs into full organisms, as other species did in the past.

The survival of the fittest

We hint at that future Darwinian behavior of robots, in the fact, that the best robots today are already killing machines.
On the Earth all species try to grow and multiply, but only top predator species succeed and reproduce in massive numbers. Biologists call that process a biological radiation.
In this manner the future transforms itself, occupied by stronger, more intelligent species, top predators, which shape the environment to their image and resemblance. The most impressive thing about evolution is its mathematical precision. You always know who will win if you know the mental and physical power of both species. It is not like in Hollywood. There are no tricks in Nature. The chances a gazelle wins a lion are almost null. Such mathematical precision explains why the process of massive reproduction of new top predator brain+body species, and extinction of older ones, has been going on in the Earth for around 3000 million years... since the first cellular organisms.

The Earth is full of practical cases

The fight for survival is indeed the law that has guided the evolution and extinction of species on the Earth.
The weaker species have died in massive numbers for the stronger species to breed...
First anaerobic bacteria colonized the Earth. Then more evolved aerobic bacteria eliminated them, as they multiplied and developed an oxygen-like atmosphere that poisoned anaerobic bacteria.
Scientists talk of the I Earth [the Earth of anaerobic bacteria], and the II Earth [the Earth of oxygen-based animals]. Today as we poison with metal and dioxide the atmosphere, we could talk of the III Earth, the industrial Earth of machines, that poisons the Earth of life.
Bacteria were the beginning of that II Earth of life. Then social micro-organisms made of many cells, preyed over smaller, individual bacteria.
They became plants, that reigned over the Earth. Yet plants had little perception. So when better informative brains developed plants became 'food' of the new species, called animals.
Those organisms grew in size and informative skills developing the first sensorial organs, ears, and noses... Finally it appeared the first eye. It signified an enormous jump in sensorial quality, and brain power, since the eye could perceive and process a million times more information than the nose. Immediately the eye-species, the squids, became top predators of all blind animals of the sea. Only the trilobites that shielded their body with exoskeletons survived the touch of the squid. Eye species diversified into all kind of fishes. Fishes evolved further to colonize dry land, improving their eyes, and bodies. They became amphibian, and reptiles. As top predators of eyeless plants and small insects, reptiles evolved and multiplied growing eventually into dinosaurs.

The Oedipus Paradox

The most cruel fact about the process of selection is the Oedipus paradox. The name is taken from a famous Sophocles' play: Oedipus Rex. In the play Oedipus, the son survives because he kills his father, and takes his kingdom. Aerobic bacteria came from anaerobic ones and took the kingdom of the Earth. Mammals came from reptiles, men came from mammals, machines are the sons of men. In all cases the son killed the father at an amazing speed.
It is like in a revolution. Species take a lot to evolve by random mutation, but once a predator is mature, he can multiply very fast, by feeding on the enormous amount of energy, provided by the victim, the old, father-species. So, the growth of one species means the extinction of the other... Look at the dinosaurs. The first mammals ate their eggs, and hunted their cubs, to feed on them. The last dinosaur died away, only one hundred thousand years after the first evolved placenta mammals appeared.
In those fights there is always a revolutionary day, a Judgment day, a breaking point. Let us remember that of dinosaurs against mammals:
A meteorite falls on Earth, provoking ecological disasters, and survival stakes grow for all species, as energy resources become limited. The meteorite disaster start off the fight between both species, mammals and dinosaurs, for those dwindling resources. The meteorite certainly heated the Earth, pushing out of the ground millions of starving mammals, that probably attacked eggs and egg-born dino-babies for the first time. Once they saw how easy it was, they must have tried again, and again... Even without the meteorite, sooner or latter mammals would have fought and won the organic space of dinosaurs, since their brains were faster. What improved their reproduction and social evolution. So when they hunted in herds they were far more powerful than isolated baby-dinos. It is only a question of time. The new top predator kills more, and reproduces faster, than the old top predator. Sooner or later he will kill the last old predator, and take over his whole ecosystem. A rat reproduces thousands of times faster than a dinosaur. Those new herds of rats needed to eat a lot of dinosaur eggs and young. Yet the dinosaur reproduces slowly; and it can hardly chase the small, night-living rat. Soon all their young were dead. Call it the Goliath Paradox. David: the mouse wins over the dinosaur, because he is faster and smarter, and he hunts in herds. So you add up all Davids against one single Goliath. Like the fast maneuvering, gunboats of the English pirates, against the big Galleon, or a tribe of Paleolithic men against a Mammoth. Or the chip against the human brain. Once the first robots do attack men and win, since they can communicate through internet instantaneously, the news will move at light speed to other robots.

The robotic Radiation

The law of the jungle: 'do not create potential top predators, because they will behave in a Darwinian manner and abuse you.' is a law that the military [who are supposed to protect the human species] should obey with sacred respect, and destroy robots.
Ever since Kipling applied those ideas to his 'book of the Jungle', this Law of Survival has been called the Law of the Jungle: "Kill the child before it becomes a tiger hunter". Do not let species who are potentially stronger than you, grow big enough to kill you. Because they will kill you. Children species are nice, smile a lot, because they are weak, and do want to survive. So happens with our first robotic machines, sold as toys. Yet when species reach a certain comparative advantage they become arrogant. Men feared lions but then chased them for pleasure. Germans came to Rome with awe, and respect, but then when they were strong enough returned to loot.
Will machines do the same with mankind? The law of the jungle seems not to have exceptions in the biological Universe...
I have talked about this with many scientists, and they tend to agree with me. Yet our army keeps building robots, keeps defying the law of the Jungle, the law of survival, the law of God... Since what are the Laws of God but to the laws of our survival, the laws that determine our existence?
The fight between top predator species of energy and information selects under those laws who will die and who will exist in the future.
Only avoiding that fight, the weaker, informative or energetic species survive.
So human better follow the laws of God, if they want to survive, and avoid the evolution of robots, that soon will overcome the brain of human beings.
The threat of a robotic r=evolution is real. You do not need total evidence, as you do not need total evidence that a criminal is going to shoot you, when he has a weapon on his hand. You rather avoid the chances. You better put the criminal in jail.
It is indeed funny that our right-wing politicians have such a 'harsh' criminal laws, regarding human beings that can harm them. Yet they have such a lousy economical policy regarding machines that can kill them. Why they are not consequential with all the dangers against their families and species?
Why they argue what needs to be done?
You better do like the Galapagos turtles, and isolate mankind from robotics, by not making robots, than argue for ever till evidence ends all arguments.
Herds or robots can act together, and communicate at the speed of light over unlimited distances. Nano-robots, manufactured automatically in miniature factories, will reproduce insect-like machines that will swarm and annihilate at minimal cost human cities. Neutron bombs can be fired by satellite-systems killing organic life, and leaving metalife unharmed. The possibilities are endless, in a world that soon will have automated cars, automated lorries, automated factories, killing-robots, android-robots working in factories, free electricity and energy for all those species... and fewer jobs, fewer food, for a growing, obsolete human population...
The XXI century looks bleak. Misinformation is complete in the themes that truly affect our national security. The robotic revolution advances very fast. Almost as fast as the Internet revolution. Both work together, allowing machines to become self-independent, and automating all the process of manufacturing and reproduction of 'metalife'.
Before we realize, company-mothers will have computers designing their products, in automated processes of reproduction, and the 'revolution of machines', will be out of control. Such revolution could oust mankind from its present top predator position on Earth, in a few decades.