Unification Theory: The Universe is a Fractal Organism of Spacial Energy and Temporal Information  

             WHAT IS TIME AND SPACE: THE NATURE OF GOD AND THE UNIVERSE

Since the beginning of history man has wondered about the nature of God and the Universe.

Since I was a kid, those 2 words also called my attention in a powerful way.

Since I was an ambitious, inquisitive mind, I always looked for words that expressed the totality, the absolute, the ultimate nature of all things. And those 2 words, God and Universe, seemed to me to represent that absolute truth better than any other ones.

Those words seemed to me with more meaning than any other words of the human language. To understand them became soon my intimate task, my work, my job.

As I grew up and became a professional writer, learning about God and The Universe, became to me, as to many philosophers before me, the natural goal of my soul. Soon, I decided to dedicate my intellectual life quest to that search.

After the first years of my quest the biggest problem to learn about God and the Universe became that hyper abundance of knowledge and opinions about both subjects.

Everybody had something to say about God and the Universe. And many of those views were different, so it was difficult to find the truth among so many opinions.

As I deepened my knowledge on those issues through the work of the great thinkers of human history, I realized, that in general both terms were the field of study of two different disciplines, religion and science. Why? After all, Scientists said that all what existed around us was the Universe, while religions said that all what existed was created by God.

So both terms referred to similar things: the meaning and nature of what existed. Why things existed. What created them. What is to say why things existed in Space and Changed in Time.

We live in a Universe that extends in Space. Yet that space changes in a rather intelligent manner. And we call that change Time, and the cause of that change God.

Time and Space become in this manner synonimous of God, the cause of Time, and the Universe, the nature of the Space in which we exist.

For that reason "What is Time and Space?" have been the oldest question of both science and philosophy. To answer that question was also the quest of my life. might have finally a correct answer. Since those who could crack that answer would have the keys to understand the nature of God and the Universe.

What mattered most? The nature of the God of Time or the nature of the Spatial Universe? Were both terms the same in as much as both treated similar themes? And if so, why they were studied with so different perspectives?.

I realized then, that the key to understand both terms, was precisely, the study of both concepts together. As Einstein had realized that space and time, the synonimous names in science to those of Universe, and God, were two sides of the same coin...

So I thought, " if I could put together, understand and relate those terms within a single model of Reality, probably I could solve my curiosity and the curiosity of so many men about the great questions that have always rounded our mind."

This is what I did. I found out what was the relationship between both, God and the Universe, and unlocked the door to solve the great mysteries of our mind, the nature, location, form and laws that guided the existence of those infinite entities of space and time, that put together we call God and The Universe.

The quest had ended. Now I want to share in this web, the results of that quest with you.

The errors of science: Discontinuity of Space and Time

It has no tbeen however an easy path...

After the first years of my quest the biggest problem to learn about the God of Time and the Universe of Space became that hyper abundance of knowledge and opinions about both subjects.

Everybody had something to say about God and the Universe. And many of those views were different, so it was difficult to find the truth among so many opinions.

Which of the different theories of religion and science was truth? It was a big problem specially when dealing with the nature of God, since I had to decide the truth among many theories. What if I took a wrong truth? Then all my quest would be misleading. So I needed first to research problems such as the nature of truth, how to distinguish right from wrong information, and apply then the results of that research to the different theories on God and the Universe. Soon it was obvious that the main errors of both, science and religion, were caused by anthropocentrisms. There were many subjective truths, created by arrogant men who wished to be so important as God, so clever as to understand the totality. Was I one of them? To avoid that arrogance I applied a different criteria: Between two theories one better for mankind, than other, I chose the one who did not favor our species but seemed more logic. Between two truths, one of them absolute, the other based in probabilities, mysteries and partial knowledge, I chose the second one. Soon I was left with very few theories that were worth to explore. Most religions that made the believer a special son of god whatever His nature was, did not pass the criteria of objectivity. This happened with many western religions, specifically those of Jewish-Protestant origin, or nationalistic religions of economical or military nature. Respect to the Universe, I also applied to mathematical truths those criteria, and discovered that many mathematical truths on the Universe such as the Big Bang, or the Theory of Space-Time of Mr. Einstein were faulty... I was tumbling important idols of our culture... This of course was forbidden by academia, and so I had to renounce to a career in the scholar world to avoid those unending arguments, that would have tampered my quest. If Moses or Calvin were sacred for religious believers, Einstein and the big bang were sacred for believers in physics. There were always believers in any subject I dealt with and to convince them was indeed a more difficult task that to understand reality itself.

On those conditions and despite my limited means thanks to those criteria my research advanced, and my list of faulty theories about reality grew. I wrote a short book, The errors of science, explaining the errors of famous theories on the universe, and a book of history, explaining the errors of famous theories-religions about God. And yet I was still on the beginning of my quest. Since to find an error is quite easy, but to solve and put the wrong theory into the right track was much more difficult.

For example when I was a kid, studying a wonderful introductory book to science, Asimov's guide to science, I discovered what I called in an earlier book, the error of Einstein: the postulate that the speed of light was fixed, was faulty, (as many scientists are discovering in the past years) and hence the entire theory of space-Time of Mr. Einstein was faulty. Yet it took me twenty years more to find the solution to those errors  the discontinuity of space-time...

Then suddenly when I had that solution, all moved very fast. I had the key - so to speak - to unlock the door to the meaning of the spatial Universe, and the Temporal God that ruled it.

The biggest error of science, the reason why science had failled where I have suceeded, was that Einsteinian concept of a continuous single time and space, a mere abstr action of the mathematical plane. Times and spaces are discontinuous, as their equivalent concepts, information and energy are. Discontinuous Spaces (energies) and discontinuous times (informations), are the ultimate substances of the Universe, and its living species.

In the "Encyclopaedia of Times", we argue that equivalence between energy and space , between a cycle of time , and a bit of information. If you are able to understand that equivalence and apply it to your knowledge of reality, you will also be able to unlock that door.

We are all made of Times: the fundamental particle.

We are all made of: Temporal Information Moving through Energic Space

What are the laws of those Times?

Why Times move in organic cycles?

Why Times evolve into organisms made of smaller Times?

How we translate the laws, species and cycles of Physics, biology and History, to Theory of Times?

All those questions receive simple answers in this web, and are exhaustively analyzed in the "Encyclopaedia of Times", which unifies social and physical sciences around the intuitive concept of an event of times, the memorial unit of the Universe, that under simple laws of morphology and social behavior has evolved in stairs of size from the simplest temporal cycle, the spiral, to the absolute cycle, the Big-Bang Universe.

Encyclopaedia of Times